You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #8: actually, the source I saw was Willeford [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. actually, the source I saw was Willeford
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Whittington's wife WAS there and there were several others KurtNYC  Feb-16-06 03:28 PM   #0 
  - And the insurgency is in its last throes....  MrBenchley   Feb-16-06 03:31 PM   #1 
  - That's in contrast to reports that the delay occurred because they needed  blm   Feb-16-06 03:32 PM   #2 
  - The reports I read said they wanted to notify other members of his family  onenote   Feb-16-06 03:35 PM   #7 
  - If his wife already knew, where would there be reason to delay?  blm   Feb-16-06 03:37 PM   #11 
     - he has grown children who they wanted to contact  onenote   Feb-16-06 05:43 PM   #38 
        - The delay was in helping the man, too. Not just the media.  blm   Feb-16-06 06:10 PM   #42 
           - i agree  onenote   Feb-16-06 06:20 PM   #43 
           - Because Whittington's wife is the sister of James Baker III  txindy   Feb-16-06 10:06 PM   #48 
  - Excellent point, that.  txindy   Feb-16-06 03:42 PM   #15 
  - Good point  FreedomAngel82   Feb-16-06 09:56 PM   #46 
  - Whoa! Sounds like one of them there Texas sized orgies!  Vinnie From Indy   Feb-16-06 03:32 PM   #3 
  - I agree, however, IF Keep every damn thing secret Cheney would  napi21   Feb-16-06 03:33 PM   #4 
  - This may very well be true.  txindy   Feb-16-06 03:34 PM   #5 
  - actually, the source I saw was Willeford  onenote   Feb-16-06 03:35 PM   #8 
     - and she is to be trusted implicitly because..............  blm   Feb-16-06 03:38 PM   # 
     - The solid "eyewitness" who didn't see anything except running security  txindy   Feb-16-06 03:41 PM   #14 
     - I was just correcting the record, not making a case for her credibility  onenote   Feb-16-06 05:42 PM   #37 
     - oh yeah  marions ghost   Feb-16-06 03:44 PM   #16 
  - Wow, that list sure keeps growing, pretty soon there will have...  Missy M   Feb-16-06 03:34 PM   #6 
  - Whistler's damn Mother was there, don't cha know.  lonestarnot   Feb-16-06 03:36 PM   #9 
     - That's why they need a 50,000 acre ranch  txindy   Feb-16-06 03:44 PM   #17 
     - bigass to bigass biggut to biggut... beerbelly to beerbelly  lonestarnot   Feb-16-06 03:59 PM   #26 
        - Don't forget another Texas feature...  txindy   Feb-16-06 04:03 PM   #28 
           - eeewwww yeah!  lonestarnot   Feb-16-06 04:26 PM   #31 
     - Not to mention Teddy Roosevelt and Ernest Hemingway.  myrna minx   Feb-16-06 04:35 PM   #35 
        - twack me up minxcat!  lonestarnot   Feb-16-06 09:54 PM   #44 
  - But why did an eye witness to the shooting ......  Botany   Feb-16-06 03:37 PM   #10 
  - Yet, like everything they do, the information must be PULLED out,  SoCalDem   Feb-16-06 03:38 PM   #12 
  - So they could have put an abrupt end ...  NanceGreggs   Feb-16-06 03:40 PM   #13 
  - Strategically why not let people speculate wrongly about that part?  KurtNYC   Feb-16-06 03:47 PM   #18 
     - But we're still waiting for the "good info" part.  txindy   Feb-16-06 03:50 PM   #19 
     - I think there are parts of this story they can lie about & some they cant  KurtNYC   Feb-16-06 03:58 PM   #24 
        - So why was it up to Darth to notify Harry's children with the wife there?  txindy   Feb-16-06 04:02 PM   #27 
     - Why not let people speculate wrongly?  NanceGreggs   Feb-16-06 03:55 PM   #22 
        - If true, a sex scandal pumps up a story; if untrue  KurtNYC   Feb-16-06 04:07 PM   #30 
           - That's my point!  NanceGreggs   Feb-16-06 04:30 PM   #34 
  - So the Mrs stood still for the 3 hour delay between the shooting  havocmom   Feb-16-06 03:51 PM   #20 
  - What's even odder about this is Darth's statement.  txindy   Feb-16-06 03:55 PM   #23 
  - Not once did I read his wife was there, until now.....  Missy M   Feb-16-06 03:59 PM   #25 
     - Some of this was known before, but they were playing with us ...  unc70   Feb-16-06 04:27 PM   #32 
  - you can drop this angle if u like...  marions ghost   Feb-16-06 03:52 PM   #21 
  - If I had my post to write over I would probably change that line  KurtNYC   Feb-16-06 04:27 PM   #33 
     - fair enough  marions ghost   Feb-16-06 05:57 PM   #41 
  - Oh, 6 days later we get this new "info". Credible?  MrTriumph   Feb-16-06 04:04 PM   #29 
  - Thanks for this. Jumping to conclusions about "affairs" was silly  Nikki Stone1   Feb-16-06 04:37 PM   #36 
  - And realizing connections that had been previously missed is great  txindy   Feb-16-06 10:04 PM   #47 
  - Proves they tried to cover it up.  Stephanie   Feb-16-06 05:48 PM   #39 
  - Cecil B. DeMille's "Dickie Breaks the Ten Commandments"  BringEmOn   Feb-16-06 05:55 PM   #40 
  - Why didn't they mention this in the beginning???  FreedomAngel82   Feb-16-06 09:55 PM   #45 
  - Whittington's wife is also  proud2Blib   Feb-16-06 10:07 PM   #49 
  - They want to limit who might get asked questions about this. Good, let  Mayberry Machiavelli   Feb-16-06 10:09 PM   #50 
  - Have you seen the latest?  txindy   Feb-16-06 10:11 PM   #51 
  - Ben Love died January 13, 2006  threadkillaz   Feb-16-06 10:26 PM   #52 
  - armstrong is 36  onenote   Feb-16-06 10:45 PM   #55 
  - Yes, I saw the Brahma Bull guy.  threadkillaz   Feb-16-06 10:59 PM   #58 
  - Well, the grandfather was 81  daleo   Feb-16-06 10:55 PM   #57 
  - what's the point in limiting our questions. when everything we know comes  bigtree   Feb-16-06 10:31 PM   #53 
  - I won't feel like I have to believe any particular facts until I see sworn  daleo   Feb-16-06 10:34 PM   #54 
  - I agree that the affair angle is unproductive  alarcojon   Feb-16-06 10:50 PM   #56 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC