You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #58: So does that mean Hackett can't be [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
58. So does that mean Hackett can't be
a man and stand up and stay in the fight? Why didn't he stay in the fight then? Why didn't he say to Reid and whomever else "let the people decide"? Why did he back down? HE'S the one who ruined his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Hackett said Brown LIED to him about NOT running for senate in Ohio still_one  Feb-16-06 09:24 AM   #0 
  - Are we still on this?  tasteblind   Feb-16-06 09:24 AM   #1 
  - until the democrats GET IT RIGHT  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:28 AM   #5 
  - Please explain. That was a little light on details. n/t  tasteblind   Feb-16-06 09:30 AM   #7 
  - Here is what I mean  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:36 AM   #12 
     - Those 4 issues - Sherrod was against all of them  LynneSin   Feb-16-06 09:41 AM   #18 
     - Except gave his word to hackett that he wasn't going to run  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:47 AM   #23 
        - Query:  yibbehobba   Feb-16-06 09:48 AM   #26 
        - And if it's the people of Ohio who should decide then why did Paul quit?  LynneSin   Feb-16-06 09:48 AM   #27 
        - because it is about money  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:51 AM   #30 
           - Well, can you blame them?  LynneSin   Feb-16-06 09:56 AM   #34 
           - And that means what?  FreedomAngel82   Feb-16-06 09:48 PM   #59 
           - We're doing fine here in Ohio, thanks  OzarkDem   Feb-17-06 12:41 PM   #74 
        - They were going to decide for Brown anyway. n/t  tasteblind   Feb-16-06 09:57 AM   #35 
        - So does that mean Hackett can't be  FreedomAngel82   Feb-16-06 09:47 PM   #58 
     - I don't disagree with you there.  tasteblind   Feb-16-06 09:56 AM   #33 
     - For me this is less about brown and hackett  still_one   Feb-16-06 10:18 AM   #43 
        - Then that should be the basis of your original post.  tasteblind   Feb-16-06 10:24 AM   #50 
           - You are right about one thing  still_one   Feb-16-06 10:28 AM   #51 
              - Most politicians, especially in Congress, never accuse anyone of lying.  tasteblind   Feb-16-06 10:33 AM   #52 
                 - I will use better judgement next time, thanks  still_one   Feb-16-06 10:54 AM   #53 
     - Why are you smearing Sherrod?  OzarkDem   Feb-17-06 12:39 PM   #73 
  - The good old boys in the smoke filled rooms have been at it longer  HereSince1628   Feb-16-06 09:34 AM   #9 
     - I think it is much worse in the last 50 years  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:38 AM   #13 
        - Maybe. But then I've only had a little more than 50 years to witness it.  HereSince1628   Feb-16-06 09:47 AM   #25 
           - good reponse, we just view it from different perspectives or experiences  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:53 AM   #31 
  - Until we win an election in Ohio? nt  Kukesa   Feb-16-06 09:35 AM   #10 
     - I remember when Ohio was a blue state  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:40 AM   #15 
     - DIEBOLD  LynneSin   Feb-16-06 09:41 AM   #19 
        - I know, but where was the Kerry promise that they had everything  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:47 AM   #24 
        - that's too much like just blaming kerry when  nolies32fouettes   Feb-16-06 09:59 AM   #38 
           - I disagree with that one. That is pure victim mentality  still_one   Feb-16-06 10:19 AM   #45 
           - you don't want to be a victim, then don't blame the other victims!  nolies32fouettes   Feb-16-06 11:22 AM   #54 
              - bye  still_one   Feb-16-06 01:04 PM   #55 
                 - Do you know the Eichmann defence?  nolies32fouettes   Feb-17-06 10:14 AM   #62 
                    - I am a Jew, and with a few exceptions such as the warsaw ghetto  still_one   Feb-17-06 10:30 AM   #63 
                       - ...  nolies32fouettes   Feb-17-06 11:11 AM   #68 
                          - I do understand your point, and there was no offense taken  still_one   Feb-17-06 12:35 PM   #72 
           - At DU we KNEW what was up in Ohio over a year before the election.  bvar22   Feb-16-06 09:52 PM   #60 
        - Diebold doesn't take over until next fall  cmd   Feb-16-06 09:57 AM   #36 
        - NO - it is NOT Diebold  DancingBear   Feb-17-06 10:48 AM   #65 
           - Be still my heart! nt  Kukesa   Feb-18-06 03:50 PM   #80 
     - My money's on the guy who was winning the primary.  tasteblind   Feb-16-06 09:44 AM   #21 
        - I think it is just the opposite  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:49 AM   #28 
           - The DNC doesn't pick sides in primaries.  tasteblind   Feb-16-06 09:58 AM   #37 
              - you are right, the DSCC is what I should have said  still_one   Feb-16-06 10:21 AM   #48 
  - When does Paul confront the guy who's sleeping with his wife?  MrBenchley   Feb-16-06 09:26 AM   #2 
  - Did he say "lied?"  mzmolly   Feb-16-06 09:26 AM   #3 
  - HE SAID BROWN PROMISED  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:29 AM   #6 
     - That's what I thought.  mzmolly   Feb-16-06 09:31 AM   #8 
     - Hackett was very firm about it, he said HE WOULD NOT  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:39 AM   #14 
        - "Promise" is a word being used here to elicit emotion.  mzmolly   Feb-16-06 09:45 PM   #56 
     - His interpretation of the events  OzarkDem   Feb-17-06 12:43 PM   #75 
  - It's very simple  atreides1   Feb-16-06 09:27 AM   #4 
  - I see how it goes.  ProudToBeLiberal   Feb-16-06 10:06 AM   #40 
  - Keep grinding the grist  WilliamPitt   Feb-16-06 09:36 AM   #11 
  - if he wasn't interviewed on springer this morning I wouldn't have brought  still_one   Feb-16-06 10:24 AM   #49 
  - Good Grief, they should have just had a primary and let the best  WI_DEM   Feb-16-06 09:40 AM   #16 
  - to cut off nose to spite face? why in the world would a hackett support  seabeyond   Feb-16-06 09:44 AM   #20 
  - The manner in which Hackett is dealing with this  madaboutharry   Feb-16-06 09:41 AM   #17 
  - or is it being misrepresented. yesterday haskett said he supports  seabeyond   Feb-16-06 09:50 AM   #29 
  - that is the point. He said he was NEVER a career politician  still_one   Feb-16-06 09:54 AM   #32 
  - yeah, those non-career politicians are SO successful  onenote   Feb-16-06 10:09 AM   #41 
  - the democrats you mention were NOT in the majority  still_one   Feb-16-06 10:16 AM   #42 
  - Look at the ones who voted FOR it  DancingBear   Feb-17-06 10:53 AM   #66 
  - But wait a minute  FreedomAngel82   Feb-16-06 09:53 PM   #61 
  - Reminds me a LOT of Nixon in 1962  MrBenchley   Feb-16-06 10:18 AM   #44 
  - That's why we like him. He still clings to the unbelievable notion that  Catrina   Feb-16-06 10:19 AM   #46 
     - Ssssshhhh!  SOS   Feb-17-06 11:20 AM   #69 
  - please check out the events of hackett brown deciding to run  seabeyond   Feb-16-06 09:46 AM   #22 
  - Hackett feels betrayed.  FrustratedDemInNC   Feb-16-06 10:03 AM   #39 
  - I feel the same way  still_one   Feb-16-06 10:20 AM   #47 
  - So why did Hackett give up his run?  FreedomAngel82   Feb-16-06 09:46 PM   #57 
  - Maybe he felt the Democratic party has nothing to offer.  rucky   Feb-17-06 11:24 AM   #71 
  - Yes, I think I'll slit my wrists  JNelson6563   Feb-17-06 10:37 AM   #64 
  - So, you'll drag it for me if DeWine and Schmitt win in November?  DancingBear   Feb-17-06 10:56 AM   #67 
     - They'll blame the Hackett supporters  SOS   Feb-17-06 01:53 PM   #76 
     - True, dat n/t  DancingBear   Feb-17-06 02:15 PM   #77 
     - Then by all means  JNelson6563   Feb-18-06 03:09 PM   #78 
     - Good headline, DB, and probably accurate. Sigh. nt  Kukesa   Feb-18-06 03:48 PM   #79 
  - Did Hackett say this, or did Springer? n/t  rucky   Feb-17-06 11:22 AM   #70 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC