You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: Are you saying that we should ignore 2006 then? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Are you saying that we should ignore 2006 then?
Is that it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -is everyone enjoying the dog and pony show? LSK  Feb-06-06 11:51 AM   #0 
  - Woof!  BlueEyedSon   Feb-06-06 11:53 AM   #1 
  - Get rid of Diebold, ES&S and the other rightwing vote counters  Angry Girl   Feb-06-06 11:54 AM   #2 
  - and none of that is possible when you dont control a branch of govt  LSK   Feb-06-06 11:55 AM   #4 
  - I hope it's not too late but there are so many signs of history repeating  Angry Girl   Feb-06-06 12:00 PM   #10 
  - But the ones that are are ALWAYS the ones that end up being  Horse with no Name   Feb-06-06 06:58 PM   #58 
  - Thaz' right.  tatertop   Feb-06-06 11:56 AM   #6 
  - I agree - we must have honest voting!  AndyA   Feb-06-06 12:16 PM   #19 
  - You have boiled it down to the bare facts. You are correct.  ladjf   Feb-06-06 12:56 PM   #31 
  - agreed. I'm voting on paper - absentee.  helderheid   Feb-06-06 02:13 PM   #34 
  - oh yes!  savemefromdumbya   Feb-06-06 11:54 AM   #3 
  - This is what 51 percent of the voters wanted.  izzie   Feb-06-06 11:56 AM   #5 
  - No kidding, WE'RE getting the govt THEY deserve. How depressing. -nt  Justitia   Feb-06-06 12:20 PM   #24 
  - Right on all counts  cali   Feb-06-06 11:56 AM   #7 
  - Powerline-Pajama's media  DainBramaged   Feb-06-06 11:57 AM   #8 
  - The "Dan Rather knows about it" remark as Durbin was walking  0007   Feb-06-06 07:11 PM   #60 
  - This is going to go the way of the torture issue. In a few weeks  The_Casual_Observer   Feb-06-06 11:58 AM   #9 
  - correction, they will SAY they have suspended them  leftchick   Feb-06-06 12:05 PM   #13 
  - Every time I watch this stuff  Imalittleteapot   Feb-06-06 12:01 PM   #11 
  - Do you realize that the Dems are laying down for this  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 12:03 PM   #12 
  - in what way?  LSK   Feb-06-06 12:06 PM   #14 
  - They are playing soft-ball. They examined the fake  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 12:15 PM   #18 
     - did you catch Leahy's line of questioning?  LSK   Feb-06-06 12:29 PM   #26 
     - You are speaking the truth Buying Thyme  Justice Is Comin   Feb-06-06 12:39 PM   #29 
        - I think RawStory is way wrong. A person cannot be charged w/ perjury  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 02:10 PM   #32 
        - I misspoke as to the term  Justice Is Comin   Feb-06-06 06:18 PM   #54 
        - how about quoting Findlaw and get back to me, ok?  LSK   Feb-06-06 02:12 PM   #33 
           - Why don't you go to FindLaw and look up the word PERJURY.  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 02:17 PM   #36 
              - how about US CODE?  LSK   Feb-06-06 02:41 PM   #38 
                 - Then you didn't read it.  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 02:52 PM   #39 
                    - 1746  LSK   Feb-06-06 02:58 PM   #41 
                       - This law is in regards to documentary evidence in court.  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 03:11 PM   #43 
                          - then which part of the law did i get wrong?  LSK   Feb-06-06 03:14 PM   #44 
                             - Start here:  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 03:29 PM   #45 
                             - FYI: RawStory corrected the story.  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 06:03 PM   #53 
  - Actually, NOT  cali   Feb-06-06 12:14 PM   #17 
  - Can you give me an example of what makes this a  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 12:17 PM   #21 
     - Leahy's opening statement  cali   Feb-06-06 12:36 PM   #28 
        - I dismiss statements form people who are supposed to investigate.  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 02:15 PM   #35 
           - Leahy just caught  cali   Feb-06-06 03:04 PM   #42 
           - You are a moron. The Dems don't even understand what they're  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 04:03 PM   #46 
              - LOL  cali   Feb-06-06 04:33 PM   #48 
                 - You're the only one missing it, probably because you're a simple person.  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 04:37 PM   #49 
                    - Feingold, Schumer and Leahy  cali   Feb-06-06 05:10 PM   #51 
                       - It wasn't the scope of the hearings that was limited; it was the scope  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 05:15 PM   #52 
           - So you weren't paying attention then?  Viva_La_Revolution   Feb-06-06 06:24 PM   #55 
              - Yes, he asked again. But you don't seem to understand that  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 06:32 PM   #56 
  - Are you saying that we should ignore 2006 then?  LoZoccolo   Feb-06-06 12:16 PM   #20 
     - Your post makes as much sense as Jeff Sessions.  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 12:18 PM   #22 
        - when you make blanket statements about dems laying down  LSK   Feb-06-06 12:33 PM   #27 
        - Only if you support willful ignorance.  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 02:18 PM   #37 
        - Fuck's that supposed to mean?  LoZoccolo   Feb-06-06 06:56 PM   #57 
           - Genius.  BuyingThyme   Feb-06-06 06:58 PM   #59 
  - But I thought Repukes were the Tough on Crime party?  JWS   Feb-06-06 12:09 PM   #15 
  - i thought they were the party of smaller govt  LSK   Feb-06-06 12:10 PM   #16 
  - Yes - it is pitiful n/t  stop the bleeding   Feb-06-06 12:19 PM   #23 
  - This is painful to watch.  LiberalAndProud   Feb-06-06 12:21 PM   #25 
  - It makes me sick. I hope the Dems have learned something from this.  in_cog_ni_to   Feb-06-06 12:41 PM   #30 
  - No. I refuse to subject myself to it.  incapsulated   Feb-06-06 02:57 PM   #40 
  - Excellent post. PRODUCTIVE.  blm   Feb-06-06 04:20 PM   #47 
  - Yeah, its pretty pointless  ComerPerro   Feb-06-06 04:37 PM   #50 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC