jody
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-17-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 22. I did not say Scientific American was a peer-reviewed journal. I merely cited |
|
it as a summary of different views on a controversial subject.
|
| -On CNN, Racist Theorist is an Expert on Intelligence |
ck4829 |
Jan-17-07 06:21 PM |
#0 |
 -
I cannot believe that man is still publishing. |
applegrove |
Jan-17-07 06:24 PM |
#1 |
| -
I won't be crying when he dies |
sakabatou |
Jan-17-07 06:25 PM |
#2 |
| -
So if my butt is huge, I have a small brain? |
Rex |
Jan-17-07 06:25 PM |
#3 |
  -
I've got a bad case of the gone-bottom, what does that say bout me? n/t |
5X |
Jan-17-07 07:13 PM |
#11 |
| -
I wonder that too. |
Rex |
Jan-17-07 07:25 PM |
#21 |
| -
And I am sure he has... |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf |
Jan-17-07 06:27 PM |
#4 |
| -
So, the smaller one's genitals, the larger one's brain? |
atommom |
Jan-17-07 06:27 PM |
#5 |
| -
this university! |
pretzel4gore |
Jan-17-07 06:54 PM |
#7 |
| -
hmm |
iverglas |
Jan-17-07 07:16 PM |
#12 |
| -
in that case |
deadmessengers |
Jan-17-07 08:08 PM |
#34 |
| -
I was kinda thinking the opposite, that he came up with that theory |
atommom |
Jan-17-07 08:45 PM |
#37 |
| -
You do have to hand it to this Philippe Rushton for duping so many |
whistle |
Jan-17-07 06:45 PM |
#6 |
| -
Rushton provokes angry arguments but his papers have been published |
jody |
Jan-17-07 07:04 PM |
#8 |
| -
Sure. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jan-17-07 07:13 PM |
#10 |
| -
harrumph |
iverglas |
Jan-17-07 07:18 PM |
#14 |
| -
Hey, you got to expect that sort of thing... |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jan-17-07 07:19 PM |
#16 |
| -
hee hee (that's all, folks) |
iverglas |
Jan-17-07 07:21 PM |
#17 |
| -
I did not apologize for eugenicists. Why do you resort to such ridiculous, wild accusations? n/t |
jody |
Jan-17-07 07:27 PM |
#23 |
| -
Well, there's post #8, for starters. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jan-17-07 07:30 PM |
#25 |
| -
In #8, I absolutely did not say Scientific American is a referred journal. Only a careless or |
jody |
Jan-17-07 07:36 PM |
#28 |
| -
Perhaps he's a white supremacist, the fundamental scientific question however is whether his |
jody |
Jan-17-07 07:22 PM |
#19 |
| -
First off, Scientific American is not a peer-reviewed journal. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jan-17-07 07:24 PM |
#20 |
| -
I did not say Scientific American was a peer-reviewed journal. I merely cited |
jody |
Jan-17-07 07:26 PM |
#22 |
| -
Imagine if this were about holocaust denial. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jan-17-07 07:29 PM |
#24 |
| -
Why change the topic? The issue is Rushton and whether his views on |
jody |
Jan-17-07 07:32 PM |
#27 |
| -
Actually, it's a very similar topic. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jan-17-07 07:37 PM |
#29 |
| -
The reasons causing the holocaust are a far cry from the issues Rushton raises. |
jody |
Jan-17-07 07:44 PM |
#30 |
| -
The reasons causing the holocaust... |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jan-17-07 07:47 PM |
#31 |
| -
Clearly the holocaust was the most evil but it was just one of a series of persecutions |
jody |
Jan-17-07 07:54 PM |
#32 |
| -
PRESTIGIOUS? Try peer reviewed journals - not that you'll find this racist |
mondo joe |
Jan-17-07 08:12 PM |
#35 |
| -
Wikipedia links to Rushton’s publications below. |
jody |
Jan-17-07 08:26 PM |
#36 |
| -
oops |
iverglas |
Jan-17-07 07:08 PM |
#9 |
| -
Rushton to be key speaker at GOP Convention '08...... |
generaldemocrat |
Jan-17-07 07:17 PM |
#13 |
| -
isn't the actual point here |
iverglas |
Jan-17-07 07:19 PM |
#15 |
| -
LOL. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jan-17-07 07:22 PM |
#18 |
| -
oh, you know |
iverglas |
Jan-17-07 07:30 PM |
#26 |
| -
Well they let Glen Beck on CNN so what really can one say? |
Rex |
Jan-17-07 07:57 PM |
#33 |
| -
Here's a couple more interesting GOP-connected figures from Rushton's Pioneer Fund |
ftr23532 |
Jan-18-07 04:48 PM |
#38 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread