| 68. The students have all passed lie detector tests. |
|
The woman's testimony is filled with impossible contradictions.
We may not have "absolute truth." But we don't need it to know that this whole case has been a travesty of justice.
|
| -Nifong bails on Duke rape case. |
aikoaiko |
Jan-13-07 03:06 PM |
#0 |
 -
This whole thing is very disturbing. |
CTyankee |
Jan-13-07 03:16 PM |
#1 |
 -
the story goes she was talked into charging them.. |
sam sarrha |
Jan-13-07 03:31 PM |
#3 |
 -
Never heard that before. Link? |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:14 PM |
#11 |
| -
gang |
jcrew2001 |
Jan-13-07 03:51 PM |
#4 |
| -
and IF this was just a cynical ploy |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 04:24 PM |
#18 |
| -
Huh? |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-13-07 04:43 PM |
#30 |
| -
and "maybe" they are. |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 04:51 PM |
#32 |
| -
Oh, Ok. |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-13-07 04:59 PM |
#35 |
| -
You're not really |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 05:08 PM |
#37 |
| -
You are way behind the curve on this one, honey. |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-13-07 05:46 PM |
#39 |
| -
what, exactly, did she "recant"..... |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 05:59 PM |
#40 |
| -
Are you actually going to pretend that she couldn't tell whether |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:34 PM |
#61 |
| -
if you read the testimony |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:28 AM |
#88 |
| -
This is why a lot of real rape cases fail, unfortunately. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:58 PM |
#128 |
| -
did she? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:54 PM |
#149 |
| -
If Nifong Abused His Office He Needs Criminally Charged. |
Robson |
Jan-13-07 09:36 PM |
#81 |
| -
If Nifong Abused His Office He Needs Criminally Charged. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:30 AM |
#89 |
| -
Durham has 200,000 people |
dsc |
Jan-14-07 01:18 PM |
#113 |
| -
200,000 people |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 02:39 PM |
#123 |
| -
He withheld exculpatory information |
geek tragedy |
Jan-14-07 02:26 PM |
#117 |
| -
did he? You're absolutely sure about that? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 02:52 PM |
#127 |
| -
I'm absolutely sure about that. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:02 PM |
#130 |
| -
I've read it. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:15 PM |
#139 |
| -
Well, that's pretty interesting. Thank you for that tidbit. |
oblivious |
Jan-14-07 03:53 PM |
#148 |
| -
Dr. Meehan disagrees with you. He purposely left the info out of the report. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:13 PM |
#154 |
| -
Meehan is now playing |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:19 PM |
#175 |
| -
I know what happened. I suggest you find out. eom |
geek tragedy |
Jan-14-07 03:10 PM |
#135 |
| -
were you there? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:16 PM |
#140 |
| -
The Only Thing Worse... |
Robson |
Jan-14-07 04:36 PM |
#161 |
| -
We can hope -- but it looks awfully suspicious, doesn't it? |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:26 PM |
#181 |
| -
Let's hope. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:28 PM |
#183 |
| -
Nightmare of Injustice For Duke Players and All Rape Victims |
Robson |
Jan-14-07 08:27 PM |
#221 |
| -
You believe this based on a TV SHOW?????? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:31 PM |
#223 |
| -
At this point almost anyone has more credibility than Nifong |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:42 PM |
#229 |
| -
Yes |
Robson |
Jan-14-07 08:50 PM |
#233 |
| -
good thing |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 09:01 PM |
#236 |
| -
I'm delighted to let you know you have mistaken a message board with a court of law. |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 09:11 PM |
#239 |
| -
glad I could cheer SOMEONE up today. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 09:16 PM |
#241 |
| -
60 Minutes isn't on here yet. I'm going to be watching. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:41 PM |
#228 |
| -
They are based on evidence that is undisputed: Nifong's own public words. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:28 PM |
#58 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-14-07 10:48 AM |
#103 |
| -
What the defense has "leaked" -- meaning, what it has written and |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:02 PM |
#56 |
| -
We know that the prosecution has violated the |
geek tragedy |
Jan-14-07 02:24 PM |
#116 |
| -
The chances of that being the case are vanishingly small. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 07:37 PM |
#54 |
| -
why do you say that? n/t |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 07:39 PM |
#55 |
| -
I agree |
MATTMAN |
Jan-13-07 05:05 PM |
#36 |
| -
She actually does have a history of mental illness, even |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 07:35 PM |
#53 |
| -
true |
MATTMAN |
Jan-14-07 09:02 PM |
#237 |
| -
And now the lawsuits against NC will commence |
SoCalDem |
Jan-13-07 03:18 PM |
#2 |
| -
I don't think you can sue a D.A. over a "criminal case". |
LiberalinNC |
Jan-13-07 03:57 PM |
#5 |
| -
You Can Sue For False Arrest, False Imprisonment, And Malicious Prosecution |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-13-07 04:02 PM |
#6 |
| -
not personally |
dsc |
Jan-13-07 04:06 PM |
#7 |
| -
I Understand That |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-13-07 04:09 PM |
#8 |
| -
Well anyone can sue anyone for anything. |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:13 PM |
#10 |
| -
She Doesn't Have Any Money |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-13-07 04:16 PM |
#13 |
| -
The state has sovereign immunity from these kinds of suits |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:22 PM |
#17 |
| -
Sovereign Immunity Can Be Pierced |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-14-07 09:22 AM |
#94 |
| -
No, but if sufficient evidence that she was lying comes to light she'd be facing criminal charges. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Jan-13-07 06:27 PM |
#46 |
| -
I think you should read "the innocent man" by Grisham |
fishnfla |
Jan-13-07 04:16 PM |
#14 |
| -
Nifong didn't interview the victim, but law enforcement did and |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:29 PM |
#21 |
| -
ummm,"the innocent man" is a true story |
fishnfla |
Jan-13-07 04:32 PM |
# |
| -
Thanks. |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:35 PM |
#25 |
| -
several people. 2 are still in jail |
fishnfla |
Jan-13-07 04:40 PM |
#27 |
| -
I'm glad Nifong has stepped aside in this LAX case |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:42 PM |
#29 |
| -
I'm not sure about the sworn statement. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:06 PM |
#133 |
| -
Not if it's a willful violation of rights like this. |
geek tragedy |
Jan-14-07 02:27 PM |
#119 |
| -
If the charges were filed because a victim claimed she was raped |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:12 PM |
#9 |
| -
I'm Not So Sure About That... |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-13-07 04:14 PM |
#12 |
| -
There was a complaint and an examination at the hospital that showed |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:16 PM |
#15 |
| -
That is what Nifong claimed, but it's never been shown that |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:40 PM |
#63 |
| -
Good Point |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-14-07 09:39 AM |
#96 |
| -
So said Nifong. |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 10:41 AM |
#100 |
| -
LOL. I've been following the case locally. Don't be so obtuse. |
Lex |
Jan-14-07 11:20 AM |
#106 |
| -
That old story has long since been discredited. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:06 PM |
#152 |
| -
That blogspot is not as credible as the N & O. Sorry |
Lex |
Jan-14-07 04:50 PM |
#164 |
| -
No, that writer doesn't espouse ANY conspiracy theories. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:28 PM |
#184 |
| -
you might want to |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 05:46 PM |
#166 |
| -
I have absolutely no idea what your last sentence means. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:36 PM |
#185 |
| -
He's a progressive Democrat? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:43 PM |
#188 |
| -
Yes, he identified himself as a progressive Democrat in one of his posts. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 07:21 PM |
#196 |
| -
I've seen his writing - |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 07:54 PM |
#206 |
| -
Link please. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:16 PM |
#216 |
| -
It's at his website... |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:20 PM |
#218 |
| -
I don't know what website or op-eds you're referring to, |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:38 PM |
#227 |
| -
here.... |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:45 PM |
#232 |
| -
Where? I did look through that page, but I still don't know |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 09:12 PM |
#240 |
| -
Wouldn't malicious prosecution still go forward? |
tammywammy |
Jan-13-07 04:17 PM |
#16 |
| -
For malicious prosecution to stick, they'd have to show |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:26 PM |
#19 |
| -
Thanks for clearing that up for me. :) |
tammywammy |
Jan-13-07 04:33 PM |
#24 |
| -
I agree with 98% of what you are saying. |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-13-07 05:16 PM |
#38 |
| -
These Are All Jury Questions |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-14-07 09:34 AM |
#95 |
| -
Why are so many RWingers rabidly negative on the Prosecution |
Disturbed |
Jan-13-07 04:28 PM |
#20 |
| -
The Prosecutor is a Democrat. The alleged victim is black. |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:32 PM |
#22 |
| -
I've been wondering about |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 04:54 PM |
#33 |
| -
Here's why I feel personal anger. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:56 PM |
#67 |
| -
Here's why I feel personal anger. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:23 AM |
#87 |
| -
Thoughtful democrats consider the case and don't decide it based only on race and class. |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 10:39 AM |
#98 |
| -
I consider myself to be |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 11:48 AM |
#108 |
| -
You've made your side abundantly clear. |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 12:42 PM |
#111 |
| -
nice attempt at a hatchet job |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:08 PM |
#134 |
| -
I was one who initially felt sympathy for the woman |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:17 PM |
#155 |
| -
What utter crap |
Pastiche423 |
Jan-14-07 05:23 PM |
#165 |
| -
By May, I was having concerns that so many DU'ers were presuming |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:11 PM |
#170 |
| -
No |
Pastiche423 |
Jan-14-07 06:28 PM |
#182 |
| -
If I'm hurting YOU so much personally, I think you should ignore me then. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:40 PM |
#187 |
| -
No thank you |
Pastiche423 |
Jan-14-07 06:49 PM |
#192 |
| -
Go ahead. Please. Point out any of my "lies." |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 07:27 PM |
#199 |
| -
Any and every thing you have posted about what happened that night |
Pastiche423 |
Jan-14-07 07:42 PM |
#202 |
| -
You are conflating your own situation with that of the accuser here. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:00 PM |
#207 |
| -
I just did |
Pastiche423 |
Jan-14-07 08:11 PM |
#213 |
| -
Do I think I am better than . . . |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:23 PM |
#219 |
| -
I hope there's karma too. It would be nice to think false accusers will have it |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 08:42 PM |
#230 |
| -
B U L L S H I T |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 07:03 PM |
#195 |
| -
I didn't dismiss the accuser's claims in the beginning. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:40 PM |
#145 |
| -
what is your attachment to this? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:40 PM |
#186 |
| -
What is my attachment? A little concern called "civil liberties." |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:45 PM |
#190 |
| -
wow. Well I guess |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:54 PM |
#194 |
| -
Actually, the accuser has no constitutional right to a trial. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 07:23 PM |
#197 |
| -
No constitutional right ? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight . . . |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:02 PM |
#209 |
| -
How can anyone know what you were talking about |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:11 PM |
#212 |
| -
you got one thing right - |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:34 PM |
#225 |
| -
As it happened, Fox news had his number. The NYTImes didn't. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:49 PM |
#65 |
| -
Lieberman was a democrat too. |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 10:43 AM |
#101 |
| -
A broken clock is right twice a day. eom |
geek tragedy |
Jan-14-07 02:30 PM |
#120 |
| -
I don't think this is a conservative vs liberal thing at all |
tammywammy |
Jan-13-07 04:32 PM |
#23 |
| -
Nifong has mishandled this and I'm glad he's stepping aside. |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:39 PM |
#26 |
| -
The students have all passed lie detector tests. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:59 PM |
#68 |
| -
I Wonder If Anybody Who Was Falsely Arrested Applauded NIfong |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-14-07 09:46 AM |
#97 |
| -
I don't know anyone who has been falsely arrested |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:51 PM |
#126 |
| -
The Difference Bewtween A Civil Suit And A Criminal Charge. |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-14-07 04:29 PM |
#158 |
| -
I understand that. As I said, the stress of a civil trial is bad enough. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:49 PM |
#191 |
| -
Rightfully so I might add. Dem or Pug doesn't matter here |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 04:40 PM |
#28 |
| -
So you think Nifong encouraged the victim to make false charges |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:46 PM |
#31 |
| -
Either he fooled them or they're morons. He's either incompetent or dishonest |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 06:02 PM |
#41 |
| -
You do a great job of illustrating why |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 06:06 PM |
#42 |
| -
My view point is right on the money**** |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 06:29 PM |
#47 |
| -
Money, being the operative word. |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 07:30 PM |
#52 |
| -
You may be right about money being the operative word. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 01:11 AM |
#84 |
| -
critical reading skills |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:44 AM |
#93 |
| -
You want to believe everything coming from one side |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 11:01 AM |
#105 |
| -
I never said |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 11:56 AM |
#110 |
| -
So if a poster is on one side you have to argue the other? |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 12:46 PM |
#112 |
| -
I don't Have to - but |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:11 PM |
#136 |
| -
Her most recent statement contradicts her earlier statements |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:27 PM |
#118 |
| -
nope. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:12 PM |
#137 |
| -
Really? The accuser can change her story multiple times and lose no credibility? |
Buzz Clik |
Jan-14-07 03:19 PM |
#142 |
| -
you might want to read this: |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:59 PM |
#151 |
| -
That NY Times article was in August. "Largely consistent" is in the |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:25 PM |
#156 |
| -
I'd say that her testimony is for a |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:12 PM |
#171 |
| -
I'd say this case should never have been brought to a grand jury |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:14 PM |
#172 |
| -
well - if we'd both |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:24 PM |
#179 |
| -
There isn't any evidence I'm not privy to that wouldn't be outweighed |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 07:25 PM |
#198 |
| -
wow. just wow. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 07:45 PM |
#204 |
| -
You are saying that her word alone CAN be relied on? |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:46 PM |
#146 |
| -
nice twist. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:44 PM |
#189 |
| -
You didn't have to explicitly state that you were taking a side |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 04:35 PM |
#159 |
| -
I haven't taken a side |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:51 PM |
#193 |
| -
Unfortunately, those are the ONLY facts available |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 07:53 PM |
#205 |
| -
did you not notice |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:01 PM |
#208 |
| -
It's a technique you used poorly. |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 08:12 PM |
#214 |
| -
did I? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:26 PM |
#220 |
| -
So what are your sources of information? |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 08:32 PM |
#224 |
| -
The same as yours, I suppose. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:59 PM |
#235 |
| -
Since all the solid evidence is in the form of documents, which you |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 09:17 PM |
#242 |
| -
questions |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:30 PM |
#222 |
| -
Thanks |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 08:34 PM |
#226 |
| -
did you think otherwise |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:43 PM |
#231 |
| -
No, but when you asked |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 08:50 PM |
#234 |
| -
I don't mean for this to sound argumentative - |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 09:06 PM |
#238 |
| -
If she made a false accusation, it's very possible she will end up in prison |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 09:54 PM |
#246 |
| -
Then why weren't you arguing on the OPPOSITE side in the first few months |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 09:20 PM |
#243 |
| -
here's the first |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 09:35 PM |
#245 |
| -
And what you don't seem to understand |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:24 PM |
#115 |
| -
and every nearly single word |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:06 PM |
#132 |
| -
The media reports are based on court documents. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:51 PM |
#147 |
| -
defense lawyers can |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:57 PM |
#150 |
| -
If Nifong had a case, which he doesn't, he'd be replying to the |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:47 PM |
#162 |
| -
so you've worked for an attorney? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:11 PM |
#169 |
| -
He might, in February. It will be interesting to see if he does. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:18 PM |
#174 |
| -
he might. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:22 PM |
#177 |
| -
No, it won't. I don't know enough about this judge or about |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 07:30 PM |
#200 |
| -
tried and acquited! |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 07:44 PM |
#203 |
| -
How did I do that? By looking at the evidence that is ALREADY public. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:03 PM |
#210 |
| -
Evidence that's public |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:19 PM |
#217 |
| -
The motions contain attachments which will be part of the evidence, |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 09:22 PM |
#244 |
| -
I think Nifong was thrilled when the case fell into his lap. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:02 PM |
#69 |
| -
the real question is - |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 04:54 PM |
#34 |
| -
No, the real question is |
laureloak |
Jan-13-07 06:13 PM |
#44 |
| -
do you KNOW something no one else does? |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 06:18 PM |
#45 |
| -
No crime took place. Get your head out of the sand**** |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 06:54 PM |
#48 |
| -
How do you know? Were you there? |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 07:28 PM |
#50 |
| -
Nope. I'm just smarter than your average bear. |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 08:28 PM |
#57 |
| -
okkkkkaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy - |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:31 AM |
#90 |
| -
If these guys rights were violated the "rights leaders" had better |
laureloak |
Jan-13-07 06:59 PM |
#49 |
| -
You don't know that any more than anyone else - |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 07:29 PM |
#51 |
| -
How long will you hang onto this?**** |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 08:29 PM |
#59 |
| -
You nor any of us know what really happened, despite the number |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 08:34 PM |
#60 |
| -
I'll bet my whole net worth that there is never a conviction of any kind |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 08:53 PM |
#66 |
| -
You're right, we weren't there. But that is completely irrelevant. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 01:24 AM |
#86 |
| -
Until we know the truth. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:33 AM |
#91 |
| -
There will be no trial. We already "know" as much as we're going to "know" |
Egalitariat |
Jan-14-07 01:51 PM |
#114 |
| -
only if you're |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:03 PM |
#131 |
| -
Okay, you claim you can argue for the other side. Let's hear it. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:20 PM |
#176 |
| -
The primary documents -- the accusers own statements, and those |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:12 PM |
#76 |
| -
I've read them. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:34 AM |
#92 |
| -
No. There is a standard for taking a case to trial. This doesn't meet it. |
Zynx |
Jan-14-07 10:46 AM |
#102 |
| -
"beyond a reasonable doubt" |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 11:51 AM |
#109 |
| -
And what evidence do you have that a crime occurred? |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:22 PM |
#178 |
| -
Then tell me what evidence is in the primary documents, |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:34 PM |
#122 |
| -
You are persupposing there were people in a room together |
AngryAmish |
Jan-14-07 04:36 PM |
#160 |
| -
actually, I'm not presupposing anything there - |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:05 PM |
#211 |
| -
The NAACP's behavior has been really disappointing. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:11 PM |
#74 |
| -
Has Jesse Jackson weighed in on this latest development? |
marshall |
Jan-14-07 10:39 AM |
#99 |
| -
Why should Jackson pay for counsel for this woman??? |
Zynx |
Jan-14-07 10:49 AM |
#104 |
| -
I read a long time ago that she was in contact with civil attorneys. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:40 PM |
#124 |
| -
The NAACP of N.C. is still strongly on the side of the accuser. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:49 PM |
#163 |
| -
Do you understand that the prosecutor has a chance to respond |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:06 PM |
#72 |
| -
We KNOW that the prosecutor has acknowledged |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:49 PM |
#125 |
| -
do you know why the rape charge |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:02 PM |
#129 |
| -
I'll play the game. Nifong still loses, as does the victim and the accused. |
Buzz Clik |
Jan-14-07 03:13 PM |
#138 |
| -
I really don't think |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:19 PM |
#141 |
| -
Well, I guess that depends on which version of her story you choose. |
Buzz Clik |
Jan-14-07 03:21 PM |
#143 |
| -
I'm not assuming their guilt |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 04:06 PM |
#153 |
| -
We seem to be making arguments toward the same point, but... |
Buzz Clik |
Jan-14-07 04:28 PM |
#157 |
| -
exactly..... |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:16 PM |
#173 |
| -
Yes, I know exactly why the crime of rape was withdrawn. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:28 PM |
#144 |
| -
not exactly |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:09 PM |
#168 |
| -
To me, too. Hugely hypocritical. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:05 PM |
#71 |
| -
Because the prosecution committed fraud, when it deliberately |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:04 PM |
#70 |
| -
The DNA evidence was actual duplicative evidence |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 09:10 PM |
#73 |
| -
Some of the DNA evidence WAS new. The first lab didn't find evidence |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:14 PM |
#77 |
| -
The main exculpatory evidence was that it didn't find the accused's |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 09:18 PM |
#79 |
| -
It goes directly to her credibility. Was she lying to the police? |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 01:01 AM |
#83 |
| -
Because liberal Democrats tend to believe in upholding civil rights. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 01:14 AM |
#85 |
| -
Why were so many Democrats defending the prosecution for so long |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:47 PM |
#64 |
| -
He can't be sued as a DA, but he can be in his other functions. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:37 PM |
#62 |
| -
If you have a link to that, I'd love to read it. |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 09:11 PM |
#75 |
| -
What part? |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:15 PM |
#78 |
| -
That he named himself lead investigator and that |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 09:19 PM |
#80 |
| -
Here's one source: |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 12:40 AM |
#82 |
| -
That makes sense. It's actually saying |
Lex |
Jan-14-07 11:25 AM |
#107 |
| -
Yes, I see what you mean. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:31 PM |
#121 |
| -
Not an attorney, but IIRC he can be sued for defamation |
bluewave |
Jan-13-07 06:06 PM |
#43 |
| -
Hurray. Not being present I can't *know* if the woman |
genie_weenie |
Jan-14-07 05:52 PM |
#167 |
| -
I'm glad I've read enough of your posts, genie_weenie, |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:24 PM |
#180 |
| -
I can not believe people are still |
genie_weenie |
Jan-14-07 07:35 PM |
#201 |
| -
I agree that this case could have a hugely detrimental effect |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:14 PM |
#215 |
| -
Beyond All The Intangible Costs Don't Forget the $$$$$ |
Robson |
Jan-14-07 09:56 PM |
#247 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore