| 14. I think you should read "the innocent man" by Grisham |
|
that DA got sued as well he should have
civil rights violations
if he withheld exculpatory evidence, and proceeded without even interveiwing the alleged victim, and made all those defamatory statements early on? Lawsuit
|
| -Nifong bails on Duke rape case. |
aikoaiko |
Jan-13-07 03:06 PM |
#0 |
 -
This whole thing is very disturbing. |
CTyankee |
Jan-13-07 03:16 PM |
#1 |
 -
the story goes she was talked into charging them.. |
sam sarrha |
Jan-13-07 03:31 PM |
#3 |
 -
Never heard that before. Link? |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:14 PM |
#11 |
| -
gang |
jcrew2001 |
Jan-13-07 03:51 PM |
#4 |
| -
and IF this was just a cynical ploy |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 04:24 PM |
#18 |
| -
Huh? |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-13-07 04:43 PM |
#30 |
| -
and "maybe" they are. |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 04:51 PM |
#32 |
| -
Oh, Ok. |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-13-07 04:59 PM |
#35 |
| -
You're not really |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 05:08 PM |
#37 |
| -
You are way behind the curve on this one, honey. |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-13-07 05:46 PM |
#39 |
| -
what, exactly, did she "recant"..... |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 05:59 PM |
#40 |
| -
Are you actually going to pretend that she couldn't tell whether |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:34 PM |
#61 |
| -
if you read the testimony |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:28 AM |
#88 |
| -
This is why a lot of real rape cases fail, unfortunately. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:58 PM |
#128 |
| -
did she? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:54 PM |
#149 |
| -
If Nifong Abused His Office He Needs Criminally Charged. |
Robson |
Jan-13-07 09:36 PM |
#81 |
| -
If Nifong Abused His Office He Needs Criminally Charged. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:30 AM |
#89 |
| -
Durham has 200,000 people |
dsc |
Jan-14-07 01:18 PM |
#113 |
| -
200,000 people |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 02:39 PM |
#123 |
| -
He withheld exculpatory information |
geek tragedy |
Jan-14-07 02:26 PM |
#117 |
| -
did he? You're absolutely sure about that? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 02:52 PM |
#127 |
| -
I'm absolutely sure about that. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:02 PM |
#130 |
| -
I've read it. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:15 PM |
#139 |
| -
Well, that's pretty interesting. Thank you for that tidbit. |
oblivious |
Jan-14-07 03:53 PM |
#148 |
| -
Dr. Meehan disagrees with you. He purposely left the info out of the report. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:13 PM |
#154 |
| -
Meehan is now playing |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:19 PM |
#175 |
| -
I know what happened. I suggest you find out. eom |
geek tragedy |
Jan-14-07 03:10 PM |
#135 |
| -
were you there? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:16 PM |
#140 |
| -
The Only Thing Worse... |
Robson |
Jan-14-07 04:36 PM |
#161 |
| -
We can hope -- but it looks awfully suspicious, doesn't it? |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:26 PM |
#181 |
| -
Let's hope. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:28 PM |
#183 |
| -
Nightmare of Injustice For Duke Players and All Rape Victims |
Robson |
Jan-14-07 08:27 PM |
#221 |
| -
You believe this based on a TV SHOW?????? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:31 PM |
#223 |
| -
At this point almost anyone has more credibility than Nifong |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:42 PM |
#229 |
| -
Yes |
Robson |
Jan-14-07 08:50 PM |
#233 |
| -
good thing |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 09:01 PM |
#236 |
| -
I'm delighted to let you know you have mistaken a message board with a court of law. |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 09:11 PM |
#239 |
| -
glad I could cheer SOMEONE up today. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 09:16 PM |
#241 |
| -
60 Minutes isn't on here yet. I'm going to be watching. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:41 PM |
#228 |
| -
They are based on evidence that is undisputed: Nifong's own public words. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:28 PM |
#58 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-14-07 10:48 AM |
#103 |
| -
What the defense has "leaked" -- meaning, what it has written and |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:02 PM |
#56 |
| -
We know that the prosecution has violated the |
geek tragedy |
Jan-14-07 02:24 PM |
#116 |
| -
The chances of that being the case are vanishingly small. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 07:37 PM |
#54 |
| -
why do you say that? n/t |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 07:39 PM |
#55 |
| -
I agree |
MATTMAN |
Jan-13-07 05:05 PM |
#36 |
| -
She actually does have a history of mental illness, even |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 07:35 PM |
#53 |
| -
true |
MATTMAN |
Jan-14-07 09:02 PM |
#237 |
| -
And now the lawsuits against NC will commence |
SoCalDem |
Jan-13-07 03:18 PM |
#2 |
| -
I don't think you can sue a D.A. over a "criminal case". |
LiberalinNC |
Jan-13-07 03:57 PM |
#5 |
| -
You Can Sue For False Arrest, False Imprisonment, And Malicious Prosecution |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-13-07 04:02 PM |
#6 |
| -
not personally |
dsc |
Jan-13-07 04:06 PM |
#7 |
| -
I Understand That |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-13-07 04:09 PM |
#8 |
| -
Well anyone can sue anyone for anything. |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:13 PM |
#10 |
| -
She Doesn't Have Any Money |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-13-07 04:16 PM |
#13 |
| -
The state has sovereign immunity from these kinds of suits |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:22 PM |
#17 |
| -
Sovereign Immunity Can Be Pierced |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-14-07 09:22 AM |
#94 |
| -
No, but if sufficient evidence that she was lying comes to light she'd be facing criminal charges. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Jan-13-07 06:27 PM |
#46 |
| -
I think you should read "the innocent man" by Grisham |
fishnfla |
Jan-13-07 04:16 PM |
#14 |
| -
Nifong didn't interview the victim, but law enforcement did and |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:29 PM |
#21 |
| -
ummm,"the innocent man" is a true story |
fishnfla |
Jan-13-07 04:32 PM |
# |
| -
Thanks. |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:35 PM |
#25 |
| -
several people. 2 are still in jail |
fishnfla |
Jan-13-07 04:40 PM |
#27 |
| -
I'm glad Nifong has stepped aside in this LAX case |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:42 PM |
#29 |
| -
I'm not sure about the sworn statement. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:06 PM |
#133 |
| -
Not if it's a willful violation of rights like this. |
geek tragedy |
Jan-14-07 02:27 PM |
#119 |
| -
If the charges were filed because a victim claimed she was raped |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:12 PM |
#9 |
| -
I'm Not So Sure About That... |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-13-07 04:14 PM |
#12 |
| -
There was a complaint and an examination at the hospital that showed |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:16 PM |
#15 |
| -
That is what Nifong claimed, but it's never been shown that |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:40 PM |
#63 |
| -
Good Point |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-14-07 09:39 AM |
#96 |
| -
So said Nifong. |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 10:41 AM |
#100 |
| -
LOL. I've been following the case locally. Don't be so obtuse. |
Lex |
Jan-14-07 11:20 AM |
#106 |
| -
That old story has long since been discredited. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:06 PM |
#152 |
| -
That blogspot is not as credible as the N & O. Sorry |
Lex |
Jan-14-07 04:50 PM |
#164 |
| -
No, that writer doesn't espouse ANY conspiracy theories. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:28 PM |
#184 |
| -
you might want to |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 05:46 PM |
#166 |
| -
I have absolutely no idea what your last sentence means. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:36 PM |
#185 |
| -
He's a progressive Democrat? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:43 PM |
#188 |
| -
Yes, he identified himself as a progressive Democrat in one of his posts. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 07:21 PM |
#196 |
| -
I've seen his writing - |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 07:54 PM |
#206 |
| -
Link please. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:16 PM |
#216 |
| -
It's at his website... |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:20 PM |
#218 |
| -
I don't know what website or op-eds you're referring to, |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:38 PM |
#227 |
| -
here.... |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:45 PM |
#232 |
| -
Where? I did look through that page, but I still don't know |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 09:12 PM |
#240 |
| -
Wouldn't malicious prosecution still go forward? |
tammywammy |
Jan-13-07 04:17 PM |
#16 |
| -
For malicious prosecution to stick, they'd have to show |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:26 PM |
#19 |
| -
Thanks for clearing that up for me. :) |
tammywammy |
Jan-13-07 04:33 PM |
#24 |
| -
I agree with 98% of what you are saying. |
Kingshakabobo |
Jan-13-07 05:16 PM |
#38 |
| -
These Are All Jury Questions |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-14-07 09:34 AM |
#95 |
| -
Why are so many RWingers rabidly negative on the Prosecution |
Disturbed |
Jan-13-07 04:28 PM |
#20 |
| -
The Prosecutor is a Democrat. The alleged victim is black. |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:32 PM |
#22 |
| -
I've been wondering about |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 04:54 PM |
#33 |
| -
Here's why I feel personal anger. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:56 PM |
#67 |
| -
Here's why I feel personal anger. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:23 AM |
#87 |
| -
Thoughtful democrats consider the case and don't decide it based only on race and class. |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 10:39 AM |
#98 |
| -
I consider myself to be |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 11:48 AM |
#108 |
| -
You've made your side abundantly clear. |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 12:42 PM |
#111 |
| -
nice attempt at a hatchet job |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:08 PM |
#134 |
| -
I was one who initially felt sympathy for the woman |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:17 PM |
#155 |
| -
What utter crap |
Pastiche423 |
Jan-14-07 05:23 PM |
#165 |
| -
By May, I was having concerns that so many DU'ers were presuming |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:11 PM |
#170 |
| -
No |
Pastiche423 |
Jan-14-07 06:28 PM |
#182 |
| -
If I'm hurting YOU so much personally, I think you should ignore me then. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:40 PM |
#187 |
| -
No thank you |
Pastiche423 |
Jan-14-07 06:49 PM |
#192 |
| -
Go ahead. Please. Point out any of my "lies." |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 07:27 PM |
#199 |
| -
Any and every thing you have posted about what happened that night |
Pastiche423 |
Jan-14-07 07:42 PM |
#202 |
| -
You are conflating your own situation with that of the accuser here. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:00 PM |
#207 |
| -
I just did |
Pastiche423 |
Jan-14-07 08:11 PM |
#213 |
| -
Do I think I am better than . . . |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:23 PM |
#219 |
| -
I hope there's karma too. It would be nice to think false accusers will have it |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 08:42 PM |
#230 |
| -
B U L L S H I T |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 07:03 PM |
#195 |
| -
I didn't dismiss the accuser's claims in the beginning. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:40 PM |
#145 |
| -
what is your attachment to this? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:40 PM |
#186 |
| -
What is my attachment? A little concern called "civil liberties." |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:45 PM |
#190 |
| -
wow. Well I guess |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:54 PM |
#194 |
| -
Actually, the accuser has no constitutional right to a trial. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 07:23 PM |
#197 |
| -
No constitutional right ? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight . . . |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:02 PM |
#209 |
| -
How can anyone know what you were talking about |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:11 PM |
#212 |
| -
you got one thing right - |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:34 PM |
#225 |
| -
As it happened, Fox news had his number. The NYTImes didn't. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:49 PM |
#65 |
| -
Lieberman was a democrat too. |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 10:43 AM |
#101 |
| -
A broken clock is right twice a day. eom |
geek tragedy |
Jan-14-07 02:30 PM |
#120 |
| -
I don't think this is a conservative vs liberal thing at all |
tammywammy |
Jan-13-07 04:32 PM |
#23 |
| -
Nifong has mishandled this and I'm glad he's stepping aside. |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:39 PM |
#26 |
| -
The students have all passed lie detector tests. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:59 PM |
#68 |
| -
I Wonder If Anybody Who Was Falsely Arrested Applauded NIfong |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-14-07 09:46 AM |
#97 |
| -
I don't know anyone who has been falsely arrested |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:51 PM |
#126 |
| -
The Difference Bewtween A Civil Suit And A Criminal Charge. |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Jan-14-07 04:29 PM |
#158 |
| -
I understand that. As I said, the stress of a civil trial is bad enough. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:49 PM |
#191 |
| -
Rightfully so I might add. Dem or Pug doesn't matter here |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 04:40 PM |
#28 |
| -
So you think Nifong encouraged the victim to make false charges |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 04:46 PM |
#31 |
| -
Either he fooled them or they're morons. He's either incompetent or dishonest |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 06:02 PM |
#41 |
| -
You do a great job of illustrating why |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 06:06 PM |
#42 |
| -
My view point is right on the money**** |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 06:29 PM |
#47 |
| -
Money, being the operative word. |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 07:30 PM |
#52 |
| -
You may be right about money being the operative word. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 01:11 AM |
#84 |
| -
critical reading skills |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:44 AM |
#93 |
| -
You want to believe everything coming from one side |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 11:01 AM |
#105 |
| -
I never said |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 11:56 AM |
#110 |
| -
So if a poster is on one side you have to argue the other? |
mondo joe |
Jan-14-07 12:46 PM |
#112 |
| -
I don't Have to - but |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:11 PM |
#136 |
| -
Her most recent statement contradicts her earlier statements |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:27 PM |
#118 |
| -
nope. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:12 PM |
#137 |
| -
Really? The accuser can change her story multiple times and lose no credibility? |
Buzz Clik |
Jan-14-07 03:19 PM |
#142 |
| -
you might want to read this: |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:59 PM |
#151 |
| -
That NY Times article was in August. "Largely consistent" is in the |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:25 PM |
#156 |
| -
I'd say that her testimony is for a |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:12 PM |
#171 |
| -
I'd say this case should never have been brought to a grand jury |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:14 PM |
#172 |
| -
well - if we'd both |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:24 PM |
#179 |
| -
There isn't any evidence I'm not privy to that wouldn't be outweighed |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 07:25 PM |
#198 |
| -
wow. just wow. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 07:45 PM |
#204 |
| -
You are saying that her word alone CAN be relied on? |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:46 PM |
#146 |
| -
nice twist. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:44 PM |
#189 |
| -
You didn't have to explicitly state that you were taking a side |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 04:35 PM |
#159 |
| -
I haven't taken a side |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:51 PM |
#193 |
| -
Unfortunately, those are the ONLY facts available |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 07:53 PM |
#205 |
| -
did you not notice |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:01 PM |
#208 |
| -
It's a technique you used poorly. |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 08:12 PM |
#214 |
| -
did I? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:26 PM |
#220 |
| -
So what are your sources of information? |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 08:32 PM |
#224 |
| -
The same as yours, I suppose. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:59 PM |
#235 |
| -
Since all the solid evidence is in the form of documents, which you |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 09:17 PM |
#242 |
| -
questions |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:30 PM |
#222 |
| -
Thanks |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 08:34 PM |
#226 |
| -
did you think otherwise |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:43 PM |
#231 |
| -
No, but when you asked |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 08:50 PM |
#234 |
| -
I don't mean for this to sound argumentative - |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 09:06 PM |
#238 |
| -
If she made a false accusation, it's very possible she will end up in prison |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-14-07 09:54 PM |
#246 |
| -
Then why weren't you arguing on the OPPOSITE side in the first few months |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 09:20 PM |
#243 |
| -
here's the first |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 09:35 PM |
#245 |
| -
And what you don't seem to understand |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:24 PM |
#115 |
| -
and every nearly single word |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:06 PM |
#132 |
| -
The media reports are based on court documents. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:51 PM |
#147 |
| -
defense lawyers can |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:57 PM |
#150 |
| -
If Nifong had a case, which he doesn't, he'd be replying to the |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:47 PM |
#162 |
| -
so you've worked for an attorney? |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:11 PM |
#169 |
| -
He might, in February. It will be interesting to see if he does. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:18 PM |
#174 |
| -
he might. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:22 PM |
#177 |
| -
No, it won't. I don't know enough about this judge or about |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 07:30 PM |
#200 |
| -
tried and acquited! |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 07:44 PM |
#203 |
| -
How did I do that? By looking at the evidence that is ALREADY public. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:03 PM |
#210 |
| -
Evidence that's public |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:19 PM |
#217 |
| -
The motions contain attachments which will be part of the evidence, |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 09:22 PM |
#244 |
| -
I think Nifong was thrilled when the case fell into his lap. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:02 PM |
#69 |
| -
the real question is - |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 04:54 PM |
#34 |
| -
No, the real question is |
laureloak |
Jan-13-07 06:13 PM |
#44 |
| -
do you KNOW something no one else does? |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 06:18 PM |
#45 |
| -
No crime took place. Get your head out of the sand**** |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 06:54 PM |
#48 |
| -
How do you know? Were you there? |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 07:28 PM |
#50 |
| -
Nope. I'm just smarter than your average bear. |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 08:28 PM |
#57 |
| -
okkkkkaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy - |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:31 AM |
#90 |
| -
If these guys rights were violated the "rights leaders" had better |
laureloak |
Jan-13-07 06:59 PM |
#49 |
| -
You don't know that any more than anyone else - |
mzteris |
Jan-13-07 07:29 PM |
#51 |
| -
How long will you hang onto this?**** |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 08:29 PM |
#59 |
| -
You nor any of us know what really happened, despite the number |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 08:34 PM |
#60 |
| -
I'll bet my whole net worth that there is never a conviction of any kind |
Egalitariat |
Jan-13-07 08:53 PM |
#66 |
| -
You're right, we weren't there. But that is completely irrelevant. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 01:24 AM |
#86 |
| -
Until we know the truth. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:33 AM |
#91 |
| -
There will be no trial. We already "know" as much as we're going to "know" |
Egalitariat |
Jan-14-07 01:51 PM |
#114 |
| -
only if you're |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:03 PM |
#131 |
| -
Okay, you claim you can argue for the other side. Let's hear it. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:20 PM |
#176 |
| -
The primary documents -- the accusers own statements, and those |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:12 PM |
#76 |
| -
I've read them. |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:34 AM |
#92 |
| -
No. There is a standard for taking a case to trial. This doesn't meet it. |
Zynx |
Jan-14-07 10:46 AM |
#102 |
| -
"beyond a reasonable doubt" |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 11:51 AM |
#109 |
| -
And what evidence do you have that a crime occurred? |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:22 PM |
#178 |
| -
Then tell me what evidence is in the primary documents, |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:34 PM |
#122 |
| -
You are persupposing there were people in a room together |
AngryAmish |
Jan-14-07 04:36 PM |
#160 |
| -
actually, I'm not presupposing anything there - |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 08:05 PM |
#211 |
| -
The NAACP's behavior has been really disappointing. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:11 PM |
#74 |
| -
Has Jesse Jackson weighed in on this latest development? |
marshall |
Jan-14-07 10:39 AM |
#99 |
| -
Why should Jackson pay for counsel for this woman??? |
Zynx |
Jan-14-07 10:49 AM |
#104 |
| -
I read a long time ago that she was in contact with civil attorneys. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:40 PM |
#124 |
| -
The NAACP of N.C. is still strongly on the side of the accuser. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 04:49 PM |
#163 |
| -
Do you understand that the prosecutor has a chance to respond |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:06 PM |
#72 |
| -
We KNOW that the prosecutor has acknowledged |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:49 PM |
#125 |
| -
do you know why the rape charge |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:02 PM |
#129 |
| -
I'll play the game. Nifong still loses, as does the victim and the accused. |
Buzz Clik |
Jan-14-07 03:13 PM |
#138 |
| -
I really don't think |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 03:19 PM |
#141 |
| -
Well, I guess that depends on which version of her story you choose. |
Buzz Clik |
Jan-14-07 03:21 PM |
#143 |
| -
I'm not assuming their guilt |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 04:06 PM |
#153 |
| -
We seem to be making arguments toward the same point, but... |
Buzz Clik |
Jan-14-07 04:28 PM |
#157 |
| -
exactly..... |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:16 PM |
#173 |
| -
Yes, I know exactly why the crime of rape was withdrawn. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 03:28 PM |
#144 |
| -
not exactly |
mzteris |
Jan-14-07 06:09 PM |
#168 |
| -
To me, too. Hugely hypocritical. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:05 PM |
#71 |
| -
Because the prosecution committed fraud, when it deliberately |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:04 PM |
#70 |
| -
The DNA evidence was actual duplicative evidence |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 09:10 PM |
#73 |
| -
Some of the DNA evidence WAS new. The first lab didn't find evidence |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:14 PM |
#77 |
| -
The main exculpatory evidence was that it didn't find the accused's |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 09:18 PM |
#79 |
| -
It goes directly to her credibility. Was she lying to the police? |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 01:01 AM |
#83 |
| -
Because liberal Democrats tend to believe in upholding civil rights. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 01:14 AM |
#85 |
| -
Why were so many Democrats defending the prosecution for so long |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:47 PM |
#64 |
| -
He can't be sued as a DA, but he can be in his other functions. |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 08:37 PM |
#62 |
| -
If you have a link to that, I'd love to read it. |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 09:11 PM |
#75 |
| -
What part? |
pnwmom |
Jan-13-07 09:15 PM |
#78 |
| -
That he named himself lead investigator and that |
Lex |
Jan-13-07 09:19 PM |
#80 |
| -
Here's one source: |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 12:40 AM |
#82 |
| -
That makes sense. It's actually saying |
Lex |
Jan-14-07 11:25 AM |
#107 |
| -
Yes, I see what you mean. |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 02:31 PM |
#121 |
| -
Not an attorney, but IIRC he can be sued for defamation |
bluewave |
Jan-13-07 06:06 PM |
#43 |
| -
Hurray. Not being present I can't *know* if the woman |
genie_weenie |
Jan-14-07 05:52 PM |
#167 |
| -
I'm glad I've read enough of your posts, genie_weenie, |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 06:24 PM |
#180 |
| -
I can not believe people are still |
genie_weenie |
Jan-14-07 07:35 PM |
#201 |
| -
I agree that this case could have a hugely detrimental effect |
pnwmom |
Jan-14-07 08:14 PM |
#215 |
| -
Beyond All The Intangible Costs Don't Forget the $$$$$ |
Robson |
Jan-14-07 09:56 PM |
#247 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore