You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: the story goes she was talked into charging them.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the story goes she was talked into charging them..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Nifong bails on Duke rape case. aikoaiko  Jan-13-07 03:06 PM   #0 
  - This whole thing is very disturbing.  CTyankee   Jan-13-07 03:16 PM   #1 
  - the story goes she was talked into charging them..  sam sarrha   Jan-13-07 03:31 PM   #3 
  - Never heard that before. Link?  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:14 PM   #11 
  - gang  jcrew2001   Jan-13-07 03:51 PM   #4 
  - and IF this was just a cynical ploy  mzteris   Jan-13-07 04:24 PM   #18 
  - Huh?  Kingshakabobo   Jan-13-07 04:43 PM   #30 
  - and "maybe" they are.  mzteris   Jan-13-07 04:51 PM   #32 
     - Oh, Ok.  Kingshakabobo   Jan-13-07 04:59 PM   #35 
     - You're not really  mzteris   Jan-13-07 05:08 PM   #37 
        - You are way behind the curve on this one, honey.  Kingshakabobo   Jan-13-07 05:46 PM   #39 
        - what, exactly, did she "recant".....  mzteris   Jan-13-07 05:59 PM   #40 
        - Are you actually going to pretend that she couldn't tell whether  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 08:34 PM   #61 
           - if you read the testimony  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:28 AM   #88 
              - This is why a lot of real rape cases fail, unfortunately.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 02:58 PM   #128 
                 - did she?  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:54 PM   #149 
        - If Nifong Abused His Office He Needs Criminally Charged.  Robson   Jan-13-07 09:36 PM   #81 
           - If Nifong Abused His Office He Needs Criminally Charged.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:30 AM   #89 
              - Durham has 200,000 people  dsc   Jan-14-07 01:18 PM   #113 
              - 200,000 people  mzteris   Jan-14-07 02:39 PM   #123 
              - He withheld exculpatory information  geek tragedy   Jan-14-07 02:26 PM   #117 
              - did he? You're absolutely sure about that?  mzteris   Jan-14-07 02:52 PM   #127 
                 - I'm absolutely sure about that.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 03:02 PM   #130 
                 - I've read it.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:15 PM   #139 
                    - Well, that's pretty interesting. Thank you for that tidbit.  oblivious   Jan-14-07 03:53 PM   #148 
                    - Dr. Meehan disagrees with you. He purposely left the info out of the report.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 04:13 PM   #154 
                       - Meehan is now playing  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:19 PM   #175 
                 - I know what happened. I suggest you find out. eom  geek tragedy   Jan-14-07 03:10 PM   #135 
                    - were you there?  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:16 PM   #140 
              - The Only Thing Worse...  Robson   Jan-14-07 04:36 PM   #161 
                 - We can hope -- but it looks awfully suspicious, doesn't it?  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:26 PM   #181 
                 - Let's hope.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:28 PM   #183 
                    - Nightmare of Injustice For Duke Players and All Rape Victims  Robson   Jan-14-07 08:27 PM   #221 
                       - You believe this based on a TV SHOW??????  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:31 PM   #223 
                       - At this point almost anyone has more credibility than Nifong  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 08:42 PM   #229 
                       - Yes  Robson   Jan-14-07 08:50 PM   #233 
                          - good thing  mzteris   Jan-14-07 09:01 PM   #236 
                             - I'm delighted to let you know you have mistaken a message board with a court of law.  mondo joe   Jan-14-07 09:11 PM   #239 
                                - glad I could cheer SOMEONE up today.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 09:16 PM   #241 
                       - 60 Minutes isn't on here yet. I'm going to be watching.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 08:41 PM   #228 
        - They are based on evidence that is undisputed: Nifong's own public words.  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 08:28 PM   #58 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-14-07 10:48 AM   #103 
     - What the defense has "leaked" -- meaning, what it has written and  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 08:02 PM   #56 
     - We know that the prosecution has violated the  geek tragedy   Jan-14-07 02:24 PM   #116 
  - The chances of that being the case are vanishingly small.  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 07:37 PM   #54 
     - why do you say that? n/t  mzteris   Jan-13-07 07:39 PM   #55 
  - I agree  MATTMAN   Jan-13-07 05:05 PM   #36 
  - She actually does have a history of mental illness, even  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 07:35 PM   #53 
     - true  MATTMAN   Jan-14-07 09:02 PM   #237 
  - And now the lawsuits against NC will commence  SoCalDem   Jan-13-07 03:18 PM   #2 
  - I don't think you can sue a D.A. over a "criminal case".  LiberalinNC   Jan-13-07 03:57 PM   #5 
     - You Can Sue For False Arrest, False Imprisonment, And Malicious Prosecution  DemocratSinceBirth   Jan-13-07 04:02 PM   #6 
     - not personally  dsc   Jan-13-07 04:06 PM   #7 
     - I Understand That  DemocratSinceBirth   Jan-13-07 04:09 PM   #8 
     - Well anyone can sue anyone for anything.  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:13 PM   #10 
        - She Doesn't Have Any Money  DemocratSinceBirth   Jan-13-07 04:16 PM   #13 
           - The state has sovereign immunity from these kinds of suits  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:22 PM   #17 
           - Sovereign Immunity Can Be Pierced  DemocratSinceBirth   Jan-14-07 09:22 AM   #94 
           - No, but if sufficient evidence that she was lying comes to light she'd be facing criminal charges.  Donald Ian Rankin   Jan-13-07 06:27 PM   #46 
     - I think you should read "the innocent man" by Grisham  fishnfla   Jan-13-07 04:16 PM   #14 
     - Nifong didn't interview the victim, but law enforcement did and  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:29 PM   #21 
        - ummm,"the innocent man" is a true story  fishnfla   Jan-13-07 04:32 PM   # 
        - Thanks.  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:35 PM   #25 
           - several people. 2 are still in jail  fishnfla   Jan-13-07 04:40 PM   #27 
              - I'm glad Nifong has stepped aside in this LAX case  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:42 PM   #29 
        - I'm not sure about the sworn statement.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 03:06 PM   #133 
     - Not if it's a willful violation of rights like this.  geek tragedy   Jan-14-07 02:27 PM   #119 
     - If the charges were filed because a victim claimed she was raped  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:12 PM   #9 
        - I'm Not So Sure About That...  DemocratSinceBirth   Jan-13-07 04:14 PM   #12 
        - There was a complaint and an examination at the hospital that showed  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:16 PM   #15 
           - That is what Nifong claimed, but it's never been shown that  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 08:40 PM   #63 
           - Good Point  DemocratSinceBirth   Jan-14-07 09:39 AM   #96 
           - So said Nifong.  mondo joe   Jan-14-07 10:41 AM   #100 
              - LOL. I've been following the case locally. Don't be so obtuse.  Lex   Jan-14-07 11:20 AM   #106 
                 - That old story has long since been discredited.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 04:06 PM   #152 
                    - That blogspot is not as credible as the N & O. Sorry  Lex   Jan-14-07 04:50 PM   #164 
                    - No, that writer doesn't espouse ANY conspiracy theories.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:28 PM   #184 
                    - you might want to  mzteris   Jan-14-07 05:46 PM   #166 
                       - I have absolutely no idea what your last sentence means.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:36 PM   #185 
                          - He's a progressive Democrat?  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:43 PM   #188 
                             - Yes, he identified himself as a progressive Democrat in one of his posts.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 07:21 PM   #196 
                                - I've seen his writing -  mzteris   Jan-14-07 07:54 PM   #206 
                                   - Link please.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 08:16 PM   #216 
                                      - It's at his website...  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:20 PM   #218 
                                         - I don't know what website or op-eds you're referring to,  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 08:38 PM   #227 
                                            - here....  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:45 PM   #232 
                                               - Where? I did look through that page, but I still don't know  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 09:12 PM   #240 
        - Wouldn't malicious prosecution still go forward?  tammywammy   Jan-13-07 04:17 PM   #16 
           - For malicious prosecution to stick, they'd have to show  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:26 PM   #19 
           - Thanks for clearing that up for me. :)  tammywammy   Jan-13-07 04:33 PM   #24 
           - I agree with 98% of what you are saying.  Kingshakabobo   Jan-13-07 05:16 PM   #38 
           - These Are All Jury Questions  DemocratSinceBirth   Jan-14-07 09:34 AM   #95 
           - Why are so many RWingers rabidly negative on the Prosecution  Disturbed   Jan-13-07 04:28 PM   #20 
              - The Prosecutor is a Democrat. The alleged victim is black.  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:32 PM   #22 
              - I've been wondering about  mzteris   Jan-13-07 04:54 PM   #33 
              - Here's why I feel personal anger.  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 08:56 PM   #67 
                 - Here's why I feel personal anger.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:23 AM   #87 
                    - Thoughtful democrats consider the case and don't decide it based only on race and class.  mondo joe   Jan-14-07 10:39 AM   #98 
                    - I consider myself to be  mzteris   Jan-14-07 11:48 AM   #108 
                    - You've made your side abundantly clear.  mondo joe   Jan-14-07 12:42 PM   #111 
                       - nice attempt at a hatchet job  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:08 PM   #134 
                    - I was one who initially felt sympathy for the woman  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 04:17 PM   #155 
                       - What utter crap  Pastiche423   Jan-14-07 05:23 PM   #165 
                          - By May, I was having concerns that so many DU'ers were presuming  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:11 PM   #170 
                          - No  Pastiche423   Jan-14-07 06:28 PM   #182 
                             - If I'm hurting YOU so much personally, I think you should ignore me then.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:40 PM   #187 
                                - No thank you  Pastiche423   Jan-14-07 06:49 PM   #192 
                                   - Go ahead. Please. Point out any of my "lies."  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 07:27 PM   #199 
                                      - Any and every thing you have posted about what happened that night  Pastiche423   Jan-14-07 07:42 PM   #202 
                                      - You are conflating your own situation with that of the accuser here.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 08:00 PM   #207 
                                      - I just did  Pastiche423   Jan-14-07 08:11 PM   #213 
                                      - Do I think I am better than . . .  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 08:23 PM   #219 
                                      - I hope there's karma too. It would be nice to think false accusers will have it  mondo joe   Jan-14-07 08:42 PM   #230 
                          - B U L L S H I T  mondo joe   Jan-14-07 07:03 PM   #195 
                    - I didn't dismiss the accuser's claims in the beginning.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 03:40 PM   #145 
                       - what is your attachment to this?  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:40 PM   #186 
                          - What is my attachment? A little concern called "civil liberties."  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:45 PM   #190 
                             - wow. Well I guess  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:54 PM   #194 
                                - Actually, the accuser has no constitutional right to a trial.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 07:23 PM   #197 
                                   - No constitutional right ? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight . . .  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:02 PM   #209 
                                      - How can anyone know what you were talking about  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 08:11 PM   #212 
                                         - you got one thing right -  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:34 PM   #225 
              - As it happened, Fox news had his number. The NYTImes didn't.  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 08:49 PM   #65 
              - Lieberman was a democrat too.  mondo joe   Jan-14-07 10:43 AM   #101 
              - A broken clock is right twice a day. eom  geek tragedy   Jan-14-07 02:30 PM   #120 
              - I don't think this is a conservative vs liberal thing at all  tammywammy   Jan-13-07 04:32 PM   #23 
              - Nifong has mishandled this and I'm glad he's stepping aside.  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:39 PM   #26 
              - The students have all passed lie detector tests.  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 08:59 PM   #68 
              - I Wonder If Anybody Who Was Falsely Arrested Applauded NIfong  DemocratSinceBirth   Jan-14-07 09:46 AM   #97 
                 - I don't know anyone who has been falsely arrested  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 02:51 PM   #126 
                    - The Difference Bewtween A Civil Suit And A Criminal Charge.  DemocratSinceBirth   Jan-14-07 04:29 PM   #158 
                       - I understand that. As I said, the stress of a civil trial is bad enough.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:49 PM   #191 
              - Rightfully so I might add. Dem or Pug doesn't matter here  Egalitariat   Jan-13-07 04:40 PM   #28 
              - So you think Nifong encouraged the victim to make false charges  Lex   Jan-13-07 04:46 PM   #31 
                 - Either he fooled them or they're morons. He's either incompetent or dishonest  Egalitariat   Jan-13-07 06:02 PM   #41 
                 - You do a great job of illustrating why  Lex   Jan-13-07 06:06 PM   #42 
                    - My view point is right on the money****  Egalitariat   Jan-13-07 06:29 PM   #47 
                       - Money, being the operative word.  mzteris   Jan-13-07 07:30 PM   #52 
                          - You may be right about money being the operative word.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 01:11 AM   #84 
                             - critical reading skills  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:44 AM   #93 
                                - You want to believe everything coming from one side  EvolveOrConvolve   Jan-14-07 11:01 AM   #105 
                                - I never said  mzteris   Jan-14-07 11:56 AM   #110 
                                   - So if a poster is on one side you have to argue the other?  mondo joe   Jan-14-07 12:46 PM   #112 
                                   - I don't Have to - but  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:11 PM   #136 
                                   - Her most recent statement contradicts her earlier statements  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 02:27 PM   #118 
                                   - nope.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:12 PM   #137 
                                      - Really? The accuser can change her story multiple times and lose no credibility?  Buzz Clik   Jan-14-07 03:19 PM   #142 
                                      - you might want to read this:  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:59 PM   #151 
                                      - That NY Times article was in August. "Largely consistent" is in the  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 04:25 PM   #156 
                                      - I'd say that her testimony is for a  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:12 PM   #171 
                                      - I'd say this case should never have been brought to a grand jury  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:14 PM   #172 
                                      - well - if we'd both  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:24 PM   #179 
                                      - There isn't any evidence I'm not privy to that wouldn't be outweighed  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 07:25 PM   #198 
                                      - wow. just wow.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 07:45 PM   #204 
                                      - You are saying that her word alone CAN be relied on?  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 03:46 PM   #146 
                                      - nice twist.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:44 PM   #189 
                                   - You didn't have to explicitly state that you were taking a side  EvolveOrConvolve   Jan-14-07 04:35 PM   #159 
                                      - I haven't taken a side  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:51 PM   #193 
                                         - Unfortunately, those are the ONLY facts available  EvolveOrConvolve   Jan-14-07 07:53 PM   #205 
                                         - did you not notice  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:01 PM   #208 
                                         - It's a technique you used poorly.  EvolveOrConvolve   Jan-14-07 08:12 PM   #214 
                                         - did I?  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:26 PM   #220 
                                         - So what are your sources of information?  EvolveOrConvolve   Jan-14-07 08:32 PM   #224 
                                         - The same as yours, I suppose.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:59 PM   #235 
                                         - Since all the solid evidence is in the form of documents, which you  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 09:17 PM   #242 
                                         - questions  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:30 PM   #222 
                                         - Thanks  EvolveOrConvolve   Jan-14-07 08:34 PM   #226 
                                         - did you think otherwise  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:43 PM   #231 
                                         - No, but when you asked  EvolveOrConvolve   Jan-14-07 08:50 PM   #234 
                                         - I don't mean for this to sound argumentative -  mzteris   Jan-14-07 09:06 PM   #238 
                                         - If she made a false accusation, it's very possible she will end up in prison  EvolveOrConvolve   Jan-14-07 09:54 PM   #246 
                                         - Then why weren't you arguing on the OPPOSITE side in the first few months  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 09:20 PM   #243 
                                         - here's the first  mzteris   Jan-14-07 09:35 PM   #245 
                                - And what you don't seem to understand  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 02:24 PM   #115 
                                   - and every nearly single word  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:06 PM   #132 
                                      - The media reports are based on court documents.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 03:51 PM   #147 
                                         - defense lawyers can  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:57 PM   #150 
                                            - If Nifong had a case, which he doesn't, he'd be replying to the  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 04:47 PM   #162 
                                            - so you've worked for an attorney?  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:11 PM   #169 
                                            - He might, in February. It will be interesting to see if he does.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:18 PM   #174 
                                            - he might.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:22 PM   #177 
                                            - No, it won't. I don't know enough about this judge or about  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 07:30 PM   #200 
                                            - tried and acquited!  mzteris   Jan-14-07 07:44 PM   #203 
                                            - How did I do that? By looking at the evidence that is ALREADY public.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 08:03 PM   #210 
                                            - Evidence that's public  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:19 PM   #217 
                                            - The motions contain attachments which will be part of the evidence,  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 09:22 PM   #244 
                 - I think Nifong was thrilled when the case fell into his lap.  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 09:02 PM   #69 
              - the real question is -  mzteris   Jan-13-07 04:54 PM   #34 
              - No, the real question is  laureloak   Jan-13-07 06:13 PM   #44 
              - do you KNOW something no one else does?  mzteris   Jan-13-07 06:18 PM   #45 
              - No crime took place. Get your head out of the sand****  Egalitariat   Jan-13-07 06:54 PM   #48 
              - How do you know? Were you there?  mzteris   Jan-13-07 07:28 PM   #50 
                 - Nope. I'm just smarter than your average bear.  Egalitariat   Jan-13-07 08:28 PM   #57 
                    - okkkkkaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyy -  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:31 AM   #90 
              - If these guys rights were violated the "rights leaders" had better  laureloak   Jan-13-07 06:59 PM   #49 
              - You don't know that any more than anyone else -  mzteris   Jan-13-07 07:29 PM   #51 
              - How long will you hang onto this?****  Egalitariat   Jan-13-07 08:29 PM   #59 
              - You nor any of us know what really happened, despite the number  Lex   Jan-13-07 08:34 PM   #60 
              - I'll bet my whole net worth that there is never a conviction of any kind  Egalitariat   Jan-13-07 08:53 PM   #66 
              - You're right, we weren't there. But that is completely irrelevant.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 01:24 AM   #86 
              - Until we know the truth.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:33 AM   #91 
                 - There will be no trial. We already "know" as much as we're going to "know"  Egalitariat   Jan-14-07 01:51 PM   #114 
                 - only if you're  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:03 PM   #131 
                 - Okay, you claim you can argue for the other side. Let's hear it.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:20 PM   #176 
              - The primary documents -- the accusers own statements, and those  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 09:12 PM   #76 
              - I've read them.  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:34 AM   #92 
                 - No. There is a standard for taking a case to trial. This doesn't meet it.  Zynx   Jan-14-07 10:46 AM   #102 
                 - "beyond a reasonable doubt"  mzteris   Jan-14-07 11:51 AM   #109 
                    - And what evidence do you have that a crime occurred?  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:22 PM   #178 
                 - Then tell me what evidence is in the primary documents,  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 02:34 PM   #122 
              - You are persupposing there were people in a room together  AngryAmish   Jan-14-07 04:36 PM   #160 
                 - actually, I'm not presupposing anything there -  mzteris   Jan-14-07 08:05 PM   #211 
              - The NAACP's behavior has been really disappointing.  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 09:11 PM   #74 
              - Has Jesse Jackson weighed in on this latest development?  marshall   Jan-14-07 10:39 AM   #99 
                 - Why should Jackson pay for counsel for this woman???  Zynx   Jan-14-07 10:49 AM   #104 
                 - I read a long time ago that she was in contact with civil attorneys.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 02:40 PM   #124 
              - The NAACP of N.C. is still strongly on the side of the accuser.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 04:49 PM   #163 
              - Do you understand that the prosecutor has a chance to respond  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 09:06 PM   #72 
              - We KNOW that the prosecutor has acknowledged  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 02:49 PM   #125 
                 - do you know why the rape charge  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:02 PM   #129 
                    - I'll play the game. Nifong still loses, as does the victim and the accused.  Buzz Clik   Jan-14-07 03:13 PM   #138 
                    - I really don't think  mzteris   Jan-14-07 03:19 PM   #141 
                       - Well, I guess that depends on which version of her story you choose.  Buzz Clik   Jan-14-07 03:21 PM   #143 
                          - I'm not assuming their guilt  mzteris   Jan-14-07 04:06 PM   #153 
                             - We seem to be making arguments toward the same point, but...  Buzz Clik   Jan-14-07 04:28 PM   #157 
                                - exactly.....  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:16 PM   #173 
                    - Yes, I know exactly why the crime of rape was withdrawn.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 03:28 PM   #144 
                       - not exactly  mzteris   Jan-14-07 06:09 PM   #168 
              - To me, too. Hugely hypocritical.  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 09:05 PM   #71 
              - Because the prosecution committed fraud, when it deliberately  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 09:04 PM   #70 
              - The DNA evidence was actual duplicative evidence  Lex   Jan-13-07 09:10 PM   #73 
                 - Some of the DNA evidence WAS new. The first lab didn't find evidence  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 09:14 PM   #77 
                    - The main exculpatory evidence was that it didn't find the accused's  Lex   Jan-13-07 09:18 PM   #79 
                       - It goes directly to her credibility. Was she lying to the police?  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 01:01 AM   #83 
              - Because liberal Democrats tend to believe in upholding civil rights.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 01:14 AM   #85 
              - Why were so many Democrats defending the prosecution for so long  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 08:47 PM   #64 
     - He can't be sued as a DA, but he can be in his other functions.  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 08:37 PM   #62 
        - If you have a link to that, I'd love to read it.  Lex   Jan-13-07 09:11 PM   #75 
           - What part?  pnwmom   Jan-13-07 09:15 PM   #78 
              - That he named himself lead investigator and that  Lex   Jan-13-07 09:19 PM   #80 
                 - Here's one source:  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 12:40 AM   #82 
                    - That makes sense. It's actually saying  Lex   Jan-14-07 11:25 AM   #107 
                       - Yes, I see what you mean.  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 02:31 PM   #121 
  - Not an attorney, but IIRC he can be sued for defamation  bluewave   Jan-13-07 06:06 PM   #43 
  - Hurray. Not being present I can't *know* if the woman  genie_weenie   Jan-14-07 05:52 PM   #167 
     - I'm glad I've read enough of your posts, genie_weenie,  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 06:24 PM   #180 
        - I can not believe people are still  genie_weenie   Jan-14-07 07:35 PM   #201 
           - I agree that this case could have a hugely detrimental effect  pnwmom   Jan-14-07 08:14 PM   #215 
              - Beyond All The Intangible Costs Don't Forget the $$$$$  Robson   Jan-14-07 09:56 PM   #247 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC