rpgamerd00d
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-11-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. I fail to see the problem with this device. |
|
Its not like it can read printing on paper, or see what is on your harddrive (or even your monitor).
At best, they can see the shape of you (but not you directly), and all your furniture and crap.
They could see a desk, but not a paper on the desk (and likely not even a pen on the desk).
Worst violation would be to see you and your mate "doing it", but in shape only (no details).
Its not like they could use it to read your mail or your internet cookies or favorites list.
|
| -New camera "sees" through walls! |
unpossibles |
Jan-11-07 03:39 PM |
#0 |
 -
How many inventions over the year havne't been misused by those in power? |
bryant69 |
Jan-11-07 03:41 PM |
#1 |
  -
Not even penicillin. |
Jackpine Radical |
Jan-11-07 03:46 PM |
#4 |
| -
Good point. |
Rex |
Jan-11-07 03:49 PM |
#5 |
| -
A judge has already ruled that such devices constitute a 4th amdnmt violation |
Atman |
Jan-11-07 03:42 PM |
#2 |
| -
I fear that ruling will have all the power of FISA. |
realpolitik |
Jan-11-07 03:46 PM |
#3 |
| -
Wasn't that a SCOTUS decision? n/t |
kgfnally |
Jan-11-07 03:50 PM |
#6 |
| -
I believe it was, yes. |
Atman |
Jan-11-07 03:56 PM |
#10 |
| -
Kyllo V. United States |
Book Lover |
Jan-11-07 05:10 PM |
#25 |
| -
Hasn't gone before the Bush judges yet! |
MidwestTransplant |
Jan-11-07 03:51 PM |
#7 |
| -
Yes, and Herr Busch would never do anything illegal! |
hashibabba |
Jan-11-07 04:14 PM |
#12 |
| -
What could possibly go wrong with that? |
tularetom |
Jan-11-07 03:54 PM |
#8 |
| -
Wow - There Oughta Be Some Interesting Pics On The Internet......nt |
global1 |
Jan-11-07 03:54 PM |
#9 |
| -
That technology has been around since I was a kid. |
Steve_DeShazer |
Jan-11-07 03:58 PM |
#11 |
| -
I fail to see the problem with this device. |
rpgamerd00d |
Jan-11-07 04:17 PM |
#13 |
| -
A thief could see if no one's home. |
annabanana |
Jan-11-07 04:19 PM |
#14 |
| -
Um.... They could do that without the device, too, you realize... |
rpgamerd00d |
Jan-11-07 04:20 PM |
#16 |
| -
Hardly. Unless they can leap up to my second story. |
WinkyDink |
Jan-12-07 08:39 AM |
#30 |
| -
You don't see "a problem with this device"? |
Ezlivin |
Jan-11-07 04:20 PM |
#15 |
| -
Its not an issue of resolution and clarity. Its a matter of science. |
rpgamerd00d |
Jan-11-07 04:21 PM |
#17 |
| -
"Seeing" print on a page implies the use of human eyeballs, not software |
Ezlivin |
Jan-11-07 04:44 PM |
#19 |
| -
IR does not pass thru solids. |
rpgamerd00d |
Jan-11-07 04:49 PM |
#21 |
| -
IR is just an example |
Ezlivin |
Jan-12-07 07:56 AM |
#26 |
| -
No, but you can combine this with various other spectrum bands |
MadHound |
Jan-12-07 08:24 AM |
#27 |
| -
well, maybe I don't want people watching me through my walls |
unpossibles |
Jan-11-07 04:29 PM |
#18 |
| -
I am increasingly amazed by the things you don't see any problem with. nm |
dicksteele |
Jan-11-07 04:48 PM |
#20 |
| -
Yeah, I know, common sense on this board is rare. -nt |
rpgamerd00d |
Jan-11-07 04:49 PM |
#22 |
| -
So, you ADMIT that you consider most DUers to be fools. HONESTY feels good, dunnit? |
dicksteele |
Jan-11-07 05:10 PM |
#24 |
| -
So your "President Evil" there is a sham for you to fool us ignoramuses into |
WinkyDink |
Jan-12-07 08:38 AM |
#29 |
| -
If you have no desire for privacy in your home |
Book Lover |
Jan-11-07 05:04 PM |
#23 |
| -
That WAS sarcasm, no? |
WinkyDink |
Jan-12-07 08:33 AM |
#28 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread