You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #19: 100% [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
19. 100%
Maybe that was part of the plan :shrug:

Who knows. But yes...they "cheapened" the process so that anything we do looks simply like revenge. It means nothing now. You can remove a president for a blow job. Oooooooooooooh. Big whoop. Impeachment is obviously a joke to some Americans. And they all happen to have (R) next to their names.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Anyone else think we're hesitant to impeach because the GOP tarnished the impeachment process? Hippo_Tron  Jan-06-07 12:04 AM   #0 
  - Exactly the GOP used the impeachment process stupidly  Erika   Jan-06-07 12:14 AM   #1 
  - I am as certain as can be...  Tandalayo_Scheisskopf   Jan-06-07 12:22 AM   #3 
  - Actually, it suited their purposes quite well.  pnwmom   Jan-06-07 12:48 AM   #16 
  - yes. but, they impeached clinton as revenge for Nixon.  illinoisprogressive   Jan-06-07 12:18 AM   #2 
  - the Clinton impeachment was a partisan travesty,a misuse of the process  librechik   Jan-06-07 12:25 AM   #7 
  - I actually think the country would understand at this point.  windy252   Jan-06-07 12:24 AM   #4 
  - The Chief Justice has no real influence over the process...  Hippo_Tron   Jan-06-07 12:26 AM   #8 
  - The votes just aren't there,  agincourt   Jan-06-07 12:25 AM   #5 
  - That's funny  Mind_your_head   Jan-06-07 12:36 AM   #13 
     - I thought I read where Lott was smacking his lips  rebel with a cause   Jan-06-07 12:44 AM   #14 
  - We first need to investigate  nadinbrzezinski   Jan-06-07 12:25 AM   #6 
  - I think says it all  Erika   Jan-06-07 12:29 AM   #10 
     - Yes but impeachment is an indictment  nadinbrzezinski   Jan-06-07 12:36 AM   #12 
  - substance matters  unblock   Jan-06-07 12:28 AM   #9 
  - No, I think the hesitation at this point comes from the fact that  Mind_your_head   Jan-06-07 12:30 AM   #11 
  - Seconded. Although we've finally got the supplies to start patching up the patient.  ellisonz   Jan-06-07 01:37 AM   #21 
  - Not only tarnished it. They trivilialized it. Now, if the House impeaches  pnwmom   Jan-06-07 12:45 AM   #15 
  - Yes, I think you're right....  Mind_your_head   Jan-06-07 12:55 AM   #17 
  - Good point  Hippo_Tron   Jan-06-07 01:07 AM   #18 
  - 100%  Atman   Jan-06-07 01:21 AM   #19 
  - Whatever the reason, it's not adequate to deny us our rights.  mmonk   Jan-06-07 01:35 AM   #20 
  - We need to build the case  sandnsea   Jan-06-07 05:15 AM   #22 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC