You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: I understand your point, and I believe it has validity [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-02-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. I understand your point, and I believe it has validity
However, I am not in any way advocating that investigations not be objective.

A major point that I am making is that the current evidence on impeachable offenses is overwhelming. Acknowleding that does not necessarily make one non-objective. If someone was to say, let's consider this evidence (that clearly points towards guilt) and evaluate it with the idea of proceeding towards impeachment I don't believe that that shows non-objectivity. It is true, I agree, that some people may see it that way, and we have to be careful about that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -When Once a Republic Is Corrupted Time for change  Jan-01-07 09:36 PM   #0 
  - Excellent post TFC, and Happy New Year. A question:  mod mom   Jan-01-07 09:48 PM   #1 
  - Thank you mod mom -- I can't precisely answer that question  Time for change   Jan-01-07 10:43 PM   #3 
     - Good news Thank you!  mod mom   Jan-02-07 01:19 PM   #24 
  - Failure to Impeach an Executive Pervaded by such Corruption...  neoblues   Jan-01-07 10:03 PM   #2 
  - knr and bookmarked for later read. Just skimming, this is a  WiseButAngrySara   Jan-01-07 10:48 PM   #4 
  - Wonderfully concise summation of the impeachment scenario.  puebloknot   Jan-02-07 06:00 AM   #5 
  - Fixed your link... WELL worth reading,  troubleinwinter   Jan-02-07 09:58 AM   #13 
  - Thanks! I welcome all the help I can get! :) nt  puebloknot   Jan-02-07 07:07 PM   #33 
  - Thanks for calling our attention to Jefferson's manual  Time for change   Jan-02-07 11:03 AM   #17 
     - Several people, including DUers Kadie and AutoRank...  puebloknot   Jan-02-07 07:16 PM   #34 
  - You won't hear this in the Ford eulogy today  malaise   Jan-02-07 06:06 AM   #6 
  - "When in the course of human events it becomes necessary..."  earlybelle   Jan-02-07 06:22 AM   #7 
  - It's necessary. NOW.  Karenina   Jan-02-07 06:31 AM   #8 
  - K & R for a well written piece  tom_paine   Jan-02-07 07:57 AM   #9 
  - Excellent post! EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK, there are a "high crimes and mis-  Peace Patriot   Jan-02-07 09:31 AM   #10 
  - Thank you Peace Patriot -- I agree with you that impeachable offenses  Time for change   Jan-02-07 11:08 AM   #18 
  - You say: "simply electing a Democrat in '08 is not sufficient"......  KoKo01   Jan-02-07 11:58 AM   #20 
  - Peace Patriot!  Independent_Liberal   Jan-02-07 03:29 PM   #28 
  - The Corruption Started With Nixon, and Grew With Ford  Demeter   Jan-02-07 09:33 AM   #11 
  - I thought at the time that the pardon was a bad idea  Time for change   Jan-02-07 08:27 PM   #35 
  - BRAVO!!  emmadoggy   Jan-02-07 09:36 AM   #12 
  - K&R for this excellent piece.  troubleinwinter   Jan-02-07 09:59 AM   #14 
  - See this post on Jefferson's Rules that state houses can move impeachment.  Peace Patriot   Jan-02-07 10:01 AM   #15 
  - Thanks for the post.  mmonk   Jan-02-07 10:11 AM   #16 
  - It may be semantics, but I am going to differ with your premise.  MGKrebs   Jan-02-07 11:57 AM   #19 
  - I understand your point, and I believe it has validity  Time for change   Jan-02-07 04:51 PM   #31 
  - Bookmarked, Recommended, and ...  understandinglife   Jan-02-07 12:31 PM   #21 
  - Excellent post.  mnhtnbb   Jan-02-07 12:44 PM   #22 
  - This is not "your father's" impeachment  seesdifferent   Jan-02-07 12:45 PM   #23 
  - Then it should be easy to find 67 Senators to convict. Name them.  GOTV   Jan-03-07 11:37 AM   #38 
  - This pResident has repeatedly said that his job is to protect the American people.  bleever   Jan-02-07 02:30 PM   #25 
  - Investigations are NOT required by impeachment.  GOTV   Jan-02-07 03:10 PM   #26 
  - I don't see how you come to that conclusion  Time for change   Jan-02-07 04:45 PM   #30 
  - Hearings are not investigations  GOTV   Jan-03-07 07:40 AM   #36 
     - I disagree  Time for change   Jan-03-07 02:00 PM   #39 
        - Look at the definition again  GOTV   Jan-03-07 03:11 PM   #40 
        - You say potato  ProudDad   Jan-03-07 09:20 PM   #42 
        - Another one from that page  GOTV   Jan-03-07 03:17 PM   #41 
  - Just because they are not required doesn't mean you shouldn't have them.  MGKrebs   Jan-02-07 06:02 PM   #32 
     - I think you and I agree.  GOTV   Jan-03-07 11:33 AM   #37 
  - K&R!  Independent_Liberal   Jan-02-07 03:28 PM   #27 
  - Impeachment is sometimes a duty.  Kurovski   Jan-02-07 04:29 PM   #29 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC