Reply #59: There Is No Hypocrisy. The Subject Is Saddam. My Position Is That The

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

mass graves filled with innocents slaughtered by his brutal hand should be evidence enough of his crimes. You tried turning it into a discussion on Bush. I'm telling you that this isn't a discussion about Bush, it's a discussion about Saddam, so please don't deflect the focus from the topic of which we are discussing.

See? Not confused at all. Outside of the Bush administration's atrocities, or anyone else's atrocities for that matter, Saddam was still an evil brutal dictator piece of now dead shit of whose crimes can easily be determined based just on the mass graves left in his wake. Very simple and direct premise.

So in a civil manner, can you tell me what you find wrong with that premise; that the mass graves filled with innocent Iraqi's brutally murdered by Saddam's hand is evidence enough of his crimes? Can you also then elaborate on what was hypocritical about that premise? After that, I'd also like to inquire what about the concept of mass graves filled with innocent Iraqi's is crap to you, as you stated?

Thanks for your response. :hi: