You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Go after them legally [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Go after them legally
Impeachment is a show trial, and basically meaningless. These guys committed high crimes and should face the legal system, not a feel-good expression of disapproval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why do the "odds" enter into discussion of the merits of impeachment? Dora  Dec-20-06 02:18 PM   #0 
  - because impeachment is political, not legal.  MrCoffee   Dec-20-06 02:21 PM   #1 
  - But I still don't get it.  Dora   Dec-20-06 02:23 PM   #2 
     - What is the strategic payoff of failed impeachment?  rinsd   Dec-20-06 02:32 PM   #9 
     - You answered my question with a question, which isn't an answer. n/t  Dora   Dec-20-06 02:42 PM   #11 
        - OK  rinsd   Dec-20-06 03:07 PM   #21 
     - The strategic cost of failure to convict in the Senate is astronomical  MrCoffee   Dec-20-06 02:43 PM   #12 
        - What do you mean?  Dora   Dec-20-06 02:50 PM   #15 
           - I believe that he was exonerated  MrCoffee   Dec-20-06 03:06 PM   #19 
  - Go after them legally  warrens   Dec-20-06 02:25 PM   #3 
  - "basically meaningless"  Dora   Dec-20-06 02:27 PM   #5 
     - The GOP has demeaned impeachment. It is now nothing but a symbol.  mondo joe   Dec-20-06 07:24 PM   #37 
  - MLK quote comes to mind:  The Count   Dec-20-06 02:27 PM   #4 
  - I know what my conscience says...  Dora   Dec-20-06 02:28 PM   #6 
  - Because we can't make a decision in a vacuum. You must take into account all factors.  Sapere aude   Dec-20-06 02:29 PM   #7 
  - What vaccuum? Where is it?  Dora   Dec-20-06 02:41 PM   #10 
     - OK, we're talking about 2 different things now...  MrCoffee   Dec-20-06 02:49 PM   #14 
        - Oh, I'm all for investigations.  Dora   Dec-20-06 02:52 PM   #16 
           - That is the point of agreement.  omega minimo   Dec-20-06 10:12 PM   #39 
  - You don't try to 'take out' the king  Jacobin   Dec-20-06 02:32 PM   #8 
  - But he's not a king.  Dora   Dec-20-06 02:46 PM   #13 
     - It's a saying. "If you strike a king you must kill him."  Kelly Rupert   Dec-20-06 03:53 PM   #26 
        - And if you turn the other way and expediently let it all go...  bobbolink   Dec-21-06 01:03 AM   #54 
           - Did impeaching Nixon keep them from coming back a few years later?  mondo joe   Dec-21-06 07:48 AM   #56 
  - Yup, don't charge the rapist, because the charge may not "stick"  bobbolink   Dec-20-06 03:00 PM   #17 
  - there's scant similarity between a criminal trial and impeachment  MrCoffee   Dec-20-06 03:02 PM   #18 
  - Crimes against the nation are crimes.  bobbolink   Dec-20-06 03:07 PM   #20 
     - Yes, but that doesn't mean it's a good analogy  MrCoffee   Dec-20-06 03:09 PM   #22 
     - It makes people think. Sorry to have offended you.  bobbolink   Dec-20-06 03:47 PM   #24 
        - There's a tremendous amount of disinformation, so don't add to it  MrCoffee   Dec-20-06 03:50 PM   #25 
           - I'm very sorry.  bobbolink   Dec-21-06 01:13 AM   #55 
     - Please try to be more accurate. Impeachment is an option given to the House of  mondo joe   Dec-20-06 07:18 PM   #34 
  - Are you under the impression that that's *not* how prosecution ought to be done?  Donald Ian Rankin   Dec-20-06 04:39 PM   #29 
  - Impeachment is not a criminal process but a political one.  mondo joe   Dec-20-06 07:16 PM   #33 
  - When they Impeached President Clinton (they knew they couldn't win).  William769   Dec-20-06 03:23 PM   #23 
  - And the failed impeachment sent Clinton's approval skyward. nt  Kelly Rupert   Dec-20-06 03:54 PM   #27 
  - I'm surprised you even have to ask the question.  Donald Ian Rankin   Dec-20-06 04:37 PM   #28 
  - What you describe is based 100% on a consequentialist ethic.  TahitiNut   Dec-20-06 04:59 PM   #31 
     - No, you've missed the point.  Donald Ian Rankin   Dec-20-06 07:10 PM   #32 
        - (Unreal.)  TahitiNut   Dec-20-06 08:59 PM   #38 
        - "...do solemnly swear to Protect and Defend the Constitution of the United States..."  omega minimo   Dec-20-06 10:32 PM   #44 
           - And HOW to protect and defend is at the discretion of the House. NT  mondo joe   Dec-20-06 10:35 PM   #45 
           - So you don't think that serving the electorate has anything to do with it?  Donald Ian Rankin   Dec-21-06 08:01 PM   #59 
              - Scare tactics?  omega minimo   Dec-22-06 11:26 AM   #60 
  - Might Not Be A Horse Race, But If Done Recklessly It Will Be One Hell Of A Dog And Pony Show.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Dec-20-06 04:40 PM   #30 
  - Because a failed attempt would cost political power  Az   Dec-20-06 07:20 PM   #35 
  - Very simple: Impeachment is a political, not a criminal, process. It is not the sole  mondo joe   Dec-20-06 07:21 PM   #36 
  - It's a battle between Strategery and Integrity  omega minimo   Dec-20-06 10:16 PM   #40 
  - It's a battle between making real changes or symbolic revenge. NT  mondo joe   Dec-20-06 10:19 PM   #41 
     - Bushco's "making real changes" to the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Unitary Executive Power.  omega minimo   Dec-20-06 10:26 PM   #42 
        - Impeachment doesn't hold them accountable.  mondo joe   Dec-20-06 10:27 PM   #43 
           - How do you figure that?  omega minimo   Dec-20-06 10:36 PM   #46 
              - Bill Clinton was impeached.  mondo joe   Dec-20-06 10:39 PM   #47 
                 - There are many recent info&link-rich threads on the Impeachment process that may help general...  omega minimo   Dec-20-06 10:54 PM   #48 
                    - Again, impeachment has been reduced to mere symbol.  mondo joe   Dec-20-06 10:58 PM   #50 
                       - No. It hasn't. See-- that's the battle between Strategery and Integrity right there  omega minimo   Dec-20-06 11:10 PM   #51 
                          - Then please explain what you think impeachment will accomplish.  mondo joe   Dec-21-06 07:49 AM   #57 
                             - Consider this  omega minimo   Dec-21-06 10:53 AM   #58 
  - I think your sig line quote answers your question  Solly Mack   Dec-20-06 10:57 PM   #49 
  - Because some idealists think that impeachment happens in a vacuum.  LostInAnomie   Dec-20-06 11:52 PM   #52 
     - Because some strategerists arguments against Impeachment are vacuous  omega minimo   Dec-21-06 12:45 AM   #53 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC