warrens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-20-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Impeachment is a show trial, and basically meaningless. These guys committed high crimes and should face the legal system, not a feel-good expression of disapproval.
|
| -Why do the "odds" enter into discussion of the merits of impeachment? |
Dora |
Dec-20-06 02:18 PM |
#0 |
-
because impeachment is political, not legal. |
MrCoffee |
Dec-20-06 02:21 PM |
#1 |
 -
But I still don't get it. |
Dora |
Dec-20-06 02:23 PM |
#2 |
-
What is the strategic payoff of failed impeachment? |
rinsd |
Dec-20-06 02:32 PM |
#9 |
 -
You answered my question with a question, which isn't an answer. n/t |
Dora |
Dec-20-06 02:42 PM |
#11 |
-
OK |
rinsd |
Dec-20-06 03:07 PM |
#21 |
-
The strategic cost of failure to convict in the Senate is astronomical |
MrCoffee |
Dec-20-06 02:43 PM |
#12 |
-
What do you mean? |
Dora |
Dec-20-06 02:50 PM |
#15 |
-
I believe that he was exonerated |
MrCoffee |
Dec-20-06 03:06 PM |
#19 |
-
Go after them legally |
warrens |
Dec-20-06 02:25 PM |
#3 |
 -
"basically meaningless" |
Dora |
Dec-20-06 02:27 PM |
#5 |
-
The GOP has demeaned impeachment. It is now nothing but a symbol. |
mondo joe |
Dec-20-06 07:24 PM |
#37 |
-
MLK quote comes to mind: |
The Count |
Dec-20-06 02:27 PM |
#4 |
 -
I know what my conscience says... |
Dora |
Dec-20-06 02:28 PM |
#6 |
-
Because we can't make a decision in a vacuum. You must take into account all factors. |
Sapere aude |
Dec-20-06 02:29 PM |
#7 |
 -
What vaccuum? Where is it? |
Dora |
Dec-20-06 02:41 PM |
#10 |
-
OK, we're talking about 2 different things now... |
MrCoffee |
Dec-20-06 02:49 PM |
#14 |
-
Oh, I'm all for investigations. |
Dora |
Dec-20-06 02:52 PM |
#16 |
-
That is the point of agreement. |
omega minimo |
Dec-20-06 10:12 PM |
#39 |
-
You don't try to 'take out' the king |
Jacobin |
Dec-20-06 02:32 PM |
#8 |
 -
But he's not a king. |
Dora |
Dec-20-06 02:46 PM |
#13 |
-
It's a saying. "If you strike a king you must kill him." |
Kelly Rupert |
Dec-20-06 03:53 PM |
#26 |
-
And if you turn the other way and expediently let it all go... |
bobbolink |
Dec-21-06 01:03 AM |
#54 |
-
Did impeaching Nixon keep them from coming back a few years later? |
mondo joe |
Dec-21-06 07:48 AM |
#56 |
-
Yup, don't charge the rapist, because the charge may not "stick" |
bobbolink |
Dec-20-06 03:00 PM |
#17 |
 -
there's scant similarity between a criminal trial and impeachment |
MrCoffee |
Dec-20-06 03:02 PM |
#18 |
  -
Crimes against the nation are crimes. |
bobbolink |
Dec-20-06 03:07 PM |
#20 |
 -
Yes, but that doesn't mean it's a good analogy |
MrCoffee |
Dec-20-06 03:09 PM |
#22 |
  -
It makes people think. Sorry to have offended you. |
bobbolink |
Dec-20-06 03:47 PM |
#24 |
 -
There's a tremendous amount of disinformation, so don't add to it |
MrCoffee |
Dec-20-06 03:50 PM |
#25 |
 -
I'm very sorry. |
bobbolink |
Dec-21-06 01:13 AM |
#55 |
 -
Please try to be more accurate. Impeachment is an option given to the House of |
mondo joe |
Dec-20-06 07:18 PM |
#34 |
 -
Are you under the impression that that's *not* how prosecution ought to be done? |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Dec-20-06 04:39 PM |
#29 |
 -
Impeachment is not a criminal process but a political one. |
mondo joe |
Dec-20-06 07:16 PM |
#33 |
-
When they Impeached President Clinton (they knew they couldn't win). |
William769 |
Dec-20-06 03:23 PM |
#23 |
 -
And the failed impeachment sent Clinton's approval skyward. nt |
Kelly Rupert |
Dec-20-06 03:54 PM |
#27 |
-
I'm surprised you even have to ask the question. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Dec-20-06 04:37 PM |
#28 |
 -
What you describe is based 100% on a consequentialist ethic. |
TahitiNut |
Dec-20-06 04:59 PM |
#31 |
-
No, you've missed the point. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Dec-20-06 07:10 PM |
#32 |
-
(Unreal.) |
TahitiNut |
Dec-20-06 08:59 PM |
#38 |
-
"...do solemnly swear to Protect and Defend the Constitution of the United States..." |
omega minimo |
Dec-20-06 10:32 PM |
#44 |
-
And HOW to protect and defend is at the discretion of the House. NT |
mondo joe |
Dec-20-06 10:35 PM |
#45 |
-
So you don't think that serving the electorate has anything to do with it? |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Dec-21-06 08:01 PM |
#59 |
-
Scare tactics? |
omega minimo |
Dec-22-06 11:26 AM |
#60 |
-
Might Not Be A Horse Race, But If Done Recklessly It Will Be One Hell Of A Dog And Pony Show. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Dec-20-06 04:40 PM |
#30 |
-
Because a failed attempt would cost political power |
Az |
Dec-20-06 07:20 PM |
#35 |
-
Very simple: Impeachment is a political, not a criminal, process. It is not the sole |
mondo joe |
Dec-20-06 07:21 PM |
#36 |
-
It's a battle between Strategery and Integrity |
omega minimo |
Dec-20-06 10:16 PM |
#40 |
 -
It's a battle between making real changes or symbolic revenge. NT |
mondo joe |
Dec-20-06 10:19 PM |
#41 |
-
Bushco's "making real changes" to the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Unitary Executive Power. |
omega minimo |
Dec-20-06 10:26 PM |
#42 |
-
Impeachment doesn't hold them accountable. |
mondo joe |
Dec-20-06 10:27 PM |
#43 |
-
How do you figure that? |
omega minimo |
Dec-20-06 10:36 PM |
#46 |
-
Bill Clinton was impeached. |
mondo joe |
Dec-20-06 10:39 PM |
#47 |
-
There are many recent info&link-rich threads on the Impeachment process that may help general... |
omega minimo |
Dec-20-06 10:54 PM |
#48 |
-
Again, impeachment has been reduced to mere symbol. |
mondo joe |
Dec-20-06 10:58 PM |
#50 |
-
No. It hasn't. See-- that's the battle between Strategery and Integrity right there |
omega minimo |
Dec-20-06 11:10 PM |
#51 |
-
Then please explain what you think impeachment will accomplish. |
mondo joe |
Dec-21-06 07:49 AM |
#57 |
-
Consider this |
omega minimo |
Dec-21-06 10:53 AM |
#58 |
-
I think your sig line quote answers your question |
Solly Mack |
Dec-20-06 10:57 PM |
#49 |
-
Because some idealists think that impeachment happens in a vacuum. |
LostInAnomie |
Dec-20-06 11:52 PM |
#52 |
-
Because some strategerists arguments against Impeachment are vacuous |
omega minimo |
Dec-21-06 12:45 AM |
#53 |