You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #155: I didn't say don't rescue them... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #128
155. I didn't say don't rescue them...
everyone should be rescued, so long as the rescue doesn't unnecessarily risk others' lives. My assessment went only to who should bear the cost of the rescue. I don't know enough about this particular situation to know whether I would put this particular group of mountain climbers in the normal risk that goes with the activity (they should cover it - or have purchased insurance to cover it) - or the emergency category (it should be a societal cost).

What I do know is that all of the things you cited as examples are all true emergencies - not normal challenges/risks associated with engaging in recreational behavior which is specifically classified as risky (if you aren't sure what these are, check out the exclusion list on any life insurance policy). People shouldn't live in fear of being abandoned in a crisis, but society should also not be required to bear all of the inevitable costs associated with risky voluntary activities.

As a diver, in addition to the cost of equipment, I also need to be able to pay the cost of a hyberbaric chamber, emergency transport out of remote locations, etc. Those are normal (and costly) risks associated with recreational diving. Insurance is readily available and relatively inexpensive. I have weighed the various possibilities and purchased insurance to cover some costs and have not with respect to other costs (which I fully expect to bear, if those risks should come to pass). It is not fair for me to expect someone else to pay the freight for routine risks associated my recreational activity - any more than it would be fair for me to expect society to pay for the equipment I need to engage in the activity in the first place - because the risks are part and parcel of the activity, quite a different situation from walking the dog or hunting for a Christmas tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC