You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: We're probably more at risk, but that's still a tiny risk for individuals. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-15-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. We're probably more at risk, but that's still a tiny risk for individuals.
Any individual is more likely to die of any number of things than of terrorism. So yeah, it could happen, will probably happen, but a big plane will probably crash next year, too.

There's always a chance some lunatic will do something incredibly bad and destructive, like destroy a whole city. But again, can you worry more about that than about hurricanes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC