You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: The ISG are not bi-partisan, they are daddy's boys [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
itsmesgd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-03-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. The ISG are not bi-partisan, they are daddy's boys
Please remember this week that the Iraq Study Group is not a group of bipartisans, they are poppy's boys. They are the same people that were behind the WHIG White House Irag Group that pushed for, and got, a war in Iraq starting back in 2002. Malloy spoke at lenght of this last Friday. These people are Iran-Contra, Carlyle Groupers, War-mongering, PNAC'ing criminals. This is not an attempt by poppy to send help to reign in chimpy, but an attempt to legitimize the war and the failed occupation. The "pullback recommendation" that has been leaked is not a pull out. The report from this "group" is over 100 pages and I'm sure says alot more than "pull back". Plus, why did we listen to a non-official group when Congress is supposed to provide oversight. This is not a Congressional oversight committee. This is an "instead of" Congressional oversight committee. What is the purpose of Congress if the Pres can get advice from his friends and Congress signs off on this?


Who are the ISG? See below
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArti...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -CNN/Time: Can Bush find an exit? deminks  Dec-03-06 08:27 AM   #0 
  - Hopefully he'll find the White House exit.....  marmar   Dec-03-06 08:29 AM   #1 
  - Hah!  XanaDUer   Dec-03-06 08:30 AM   #2 
  - That was my first thought even before seeing the picture of clueless George  Dudley_DUright   Dec-03-06 08:31 AM   #3 
  - But Bush has never had to pull off a U-turn  Toots   Dec-03-06 09:35 AM   #4 
  - The ISG are not bi-partisan, they are daddy's boys  itsmesgd   Dec-03-06 10:00 AM   #5 
     - Exactly. The names "James Baker" and "bi-partisan" do NOT coincide.  Robeson   Dec-03-06 10:06 AM   #6 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC