You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #84: Okay, hold on a second here... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
84. Okay, hold on a second here...
"Okay, men, in here..."

"What is it exactly that you don't get?"

Addressing an entire gender like this isn't right. I'm a man. A REAL man. A REAL man because, were I to have sex with a woman, and she got pregnant, it'd be her decision. If she wanted my opinion, she'd get it. However, whatever her CHOICE was, regardless of my opinion, I'd support 100%, no matter what.

To answer your specific questions:

Does my daughter have the right to terminate a pregnancy if she is at risk of dying and leaving 3 small children?
Absolutely, and I'll fight for that right.

Will young girls have the right to terminate a pregnancy or prevent one if, God forbid, they are raped?
Absolutely, and I'll fight for that right.

Do all women have the right to use birth control pills to prevent pregancy to begin with?
Absolutely, and I'll fight for that right.

Are women entitled at all to say what happens to their bodies, or are we chattels beholden to the decision of some all knowing male in our lives?
"Entitled?" Absolutely not. Entitled means given a right by law (at least to me and Webster). Women have the inherent right to say what happens to and with their bodies. Law has nothing to do with it. Women aren't chattel beholden to any decision, male or female, other than their own.

At what point does your academic legal exercise become detrimental to a woman's safety and health?
A woman's safety and health should never be an issue decided by anyone other than that woman. So, I guess, at NO point.

At what point, do we, as women, exist as individuals then?
As soon as you are an individual, that's when.

My point is, some of the fellas are also out there working to beat down these same issues, and really, really don't like get lumped in. I do understand your anger, as I'd be damn pissed too, as I'm not facing what our women kin are. I'd just like different wording. I know, I'm asking for a schism here, and it's petty, but feeling like I'm getting slapped when it's not deserved kind of sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC