conscious evolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-25-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
|
something in your reply:'constitution that MANDATES congress impeaching'
While the issue of a 'mandate' is debatable(depending on the definition of Shall,imo).The whole basis of whether or not we are a nation of laws makes it imperative that impeachment proceedings occur.
In post 10 you used the words 'Constitutional imperative'.Was that intentional or a slip of the tongue,so to speak.Either way I think you may have confused some of us,resulting in this little flame war that has erupted.
|
| -When does the Bush impeachment begin? |
Copperred |
Nov-23-06 09:02 PM |
#0 |
 -
As soon as pragmatic ,get along shit ends .Impeachment or Bust!!! |
orpupilofnature57 |
Nov-23-06 09:03 PM |
#1 |
  -
Bust--Pelosi says it's off the table and Conyers agrees. n/t |
elocs |
Nov-23-06 10:50 PM |
#3 |
| -
Wow! An Impeachment Now post without a greatest recommendation. Inconceivable! |
elocs |
Nov-23-06 10:48 PM |
#2 |
| -
No more coddling of the criminals |
BeFree |
Nov-23-06 10:55 PM |
#4 |
| -
Impeachment is a Constitutional imperative. - n/t |
porphyrian |
Nov-23-06 10:58 PM |
#5 |
| -
Ummm, No It Isn't. Not By Any Means. It's A Political Decision Used With The Voluntary Discretion |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-23-06 11:10 PM |
#8 |
| -
I just love to have you contradict and dismiss me, man. |
porphyrian |
Nov-23-06 11:13 PM |
#9 |
| -
Don't Flatter Yourself. It Ain't About You. It Is About Accuracy And Fact. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-23-06 11:19 PM |
#10 |
| -
See? |
porphyrian |
Nov-23-06 11:28 PM |
#12 |
| -
You Just Described Why You Believe There To Be Cause For Impeachment. That's A Far Cry From It |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-23-06 11:32 PM |
#13 |
| -
If you deny it enough, it may cover your refusal to understand what I've said. |
porphyrian |
Nov-23-06 11:38 PM |
#15 |
| -
"We can fight all day over my choice of vocabulary" |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-23-06 11:50 PM |
#17 |
| -
Take care. - n/t |
porphyrian |
Nov-23-06 11:56 PM |
#18 |
| -
Defense of the Constitution demands impeachment. |
petgoat |
Nov-24-06 12:44 PM |
#25 |
| -
"That's what makes impeachment a Constitutional imperative" |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-24-06 01:51 PM |
#30 |
| -
Is so. Bush's actions stand as precedents until they are |
petgoat |
Nov-24-06 09:15 PM |
#33 |
| -
Sorry but it is a Constitutional imperative. |
conscious evolution |
Nov-24-06 09:59 PM |
#34 |
| -
No, It 100% Isn't. You Declaring It Such Doesn't Make It So. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-24-06 10:49 PM |
#35 |
| -
Do you know what the word oath means? |
conscious evolution |
Nov-24-06 11:06 PM |
#36 |
| -
Nice Try. Your Point Is Still Irrelevant And Your Argument Still Refuted. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-24-06 11:44 PM |
#37 |
| -
This is getting interesting |
conscious evolution |
Nov-25-06 12:49 PM |
#39 |
| -
I just noticed |
conscious evolution |
Nov-25-06 01:53 PM |
#43 |
| -
Yes it does! But I thought we had to vestigate first :>>>>) |
lonestarnot |
Nov-25-06 07:07 PM |
#50 |
| -
Investigate to confirm what's obvious on its face from the facts. nt |
petgoat |
Nov-25-06 08:45 PM |
#51 |
| -
Exactly, why have laws , |
bahrbearian |
Nov-24-06 09:58 AM |
#21 |
| -
Impeach (accuse) or dismiss the charges. Anything less is dereliction of duty. |
pat_k |
Nov-24-06 01:22 PM |
#28 |
| -
This Is So Over The Top, Over Zealous And Quite Simply Incorrect. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-24-06 04:11 PM |
#32 |
| -
Dems role in protecting the constitution |
petgoat |
Nov-25-06 01:15 PM |
#40 |
| -
I love to hear the Truth, thanks porphyrian |
Freeusfromthechurch |
Nov-24-06 12:02 PM |
#23 |
| -
Well, don't consider me a reliable source, but you're welcome. |
porphyrian |
Nov-25-06 04:39 PM |
#46 |
| -
Members are bound by oath to act. The power to impeach is the weapon . . . |
pat_k |
Nov-24-06 01:58 PM |
#31 |
| -
It started November 7. Patience. |
buddysmellgood |
Nov-23-06 11:01 PM |
#6 |
| -
It Doesn't. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Nov-23-06 11:08 PM |
#7 |
| -
Yes, investigations first. We, the people, must be armed with truth. |
Theduckno2 |
Nov-23-06 11:47 PM |
#16 |
| -
In fact, there IS an impeachment effort under way. |
anotheryellowdog |
Nov-23-06 11:20 PM |
#11 |
| -
Never. |
Aya Reiko |
Nov-23-06 11:37 PM |
#14 |
| -
"we need actual evidence." |
petgoat |
Nov-24-06 12:47 PM |
#26 |
| -
Copperred....where are you? You've been here since 2003 |
alittlelark |
Nov-24-06 12:59 AM |
#19 |
| -
Ark, I travel allot and post selectively... |
Copperred |
Nov-24-06 08:27 AM |
#20 |
| -
Patience my pretty |
catmandu57 |
Nov-24-06 10:42 AM |
#22 |
| -
You need to insist on it |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-24-06 12:04 PM |
#24 |
| -
First there will be committees set up for investigations of |
Cleita |
Nov-24-06 12:53 PM |
#27 |
| -
My guess? |
baby_mouse |
Nov-24-06 01:27 PM |
#29 |
| -
not any time soon, if ever |
onenote |
Nov-25-06 12:13 AM |
#38 |
| -
You seem to be taking the fact that the Democratic poobahs |
petgoat |
Nov-25-06 01:25 PM |
#41 |
| -
whatever the reason, impeachment wasn't an issue in the elections |
onenote |
Nov-25-06 03:26 PM |
#44 |
| -
The public did not swear to defend the Constitution. The |
petgoat |
Nov-25-06 04:25 PM |
#45 |
| -
And if you don't like how the legislature operates, vote them out |
onenote |
Nov-25-06 05:07 PM |
#47 |
| -
Sometimes leaders have to do what's right even when it's |
petgoat |
Nov-25-06 07:02 PM |
#49 |
| -
so you acknowledge, in effect, that the public isn't ready for impeachment |
onenote |
Nov-26-06 06:45 AM |
#52 |
| -
I acknowledge nothing of the sort. |
petgoat |
Nov-26-06 12:25 PM |
#54 |
| -
and why didn't the "poo-bahs" want to "cloud" local races with that referndum |
onenote |
Nov-26-06 04:40 PM |
#56 |
| -
You'd have to ask them. I'd suggest it would have been a |
petgoat |
Nov-26-06 05:01 PM |
#57 |
| -
Answer: Unfortunately, when hell freezes over. With Feingold and |
Seabiscuit |
Nov-25-06 01:31 PM |
#42 |
| -
It's up to the people to push for Impeachment. |
TheGoldenRule |
Nov-25-06 05:18 PM |
#48 |
| -
great links- thanks! |
Founders Know Best |
Nov-26-06 11:34 AM |
#53 |
| -
Hate to break it to ya, but you can hardly muster a majority on DU to support immediate impeachment |
Bucky |
Nov-26-06 12:27 PM |
#55 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread