You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #84: Unless a form of bc has a 100% effectiveness, your premise is faulty... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #72
84. Unless a form of bc has a 100% effectiveness, your premise is faulty...
No such bc exists (abstinence notwithstanding, but let's be serious: People are not going to stop having sex and it's silly to suggest that they do so), so to rely on one form automatically comes with a risk. Two forms greatly reduces that risk, and three practically eliminates that risk (though not 100%; still fairly remote). Triple redundancy as a form of precaution is a great policy in anything field where there is a risk involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC