Reply #104: Because, you didnt; attack anything but a list of issues

[Zodiak]

This is the FOURTH time I have had to tell you that. You treated that list of issues like a list of Joe's votes.

Here is the list once again of Joe's bad votes:

He voted to confirm Condi
He voted to limit class action lawsuits
He voted for Gonzales
He voted to confirm Negroponte
He voted for the Cheney Energy Bill
He voted for CAFTA, then abstained on CAFTA
Of course he, like many others, refused to even give a speech for Ohio voters in 2004
He was a member of the gang of 14 that gave us three radical RW judges
He voted for cloture on Alito and then voted against the nomination
He voted to extend the Patriot Act
He voted for the US Oman Free Trade Agreement
He voted to confirm Roberts as Chief Justics of the Supreme Court


To that add the war, the emergency contraception, the violation of campaign finance law, the independent run for election, the criticizing of other Democrats for their position on the war, the stabbing of Clinton in the back, the mindless approval of Michael Brown, and the shameless attempts to blackmail the party and you have one heck of a laundry list.

Please tell me how Joe was being "progressive" or a good Democrat in any of these votes, because these are the ones in contention.

This is what you meant to refute....as it stands now, you attacked a strawman and are strutting around this subthread as if you had accomplished something meaningful.