Reply #89: So, your experience...

[Sapphocrat]

...with one "passive agressive Gay Man" {sic} colored your "choice to support Gay rights"?

Tell me what I would lose by saying F' him and vote against any and every Gay Marriage Bill because he was a self serving in your face dick.

My God, that really is what you meant!
:wow:

OK, so then you think it would be a good idea for me to demand a repeal of the Civil Rights Act because I think Mike Tyson is one of the biggest pricks who ever lived? After all, he's black and everything. And he's a self-serving, in-your-face dick.

Jiminy Cricket on a crutch, so you have any idea what you're saying?

Hetero's have no reason to support Gay's.

And I have no "reason" to support Roe v. Wade, or school lunch programs, or labor unions, as I will never be pregnant, I have no hungry children, and I don't belong to a union. Guess what? My reason is that supporting all of the above (and more) is the right thing to do.

Would you mind telling me what your top three pet issues are? Bringing the troops home? Lowering prescription drug prices? Campaign finance reform? 'Cause I'd like to know which issues to stop supporting.

Can you shock me any more than you already have? Oh, wait, you can -- here it comes:

More dependants on health insurance will only cost heteros more on theirs.

Do the math for me. And if you can't do the math, then explain to me why you should have health insurance, and I should die a slow, painful death from cancer because I have none. Be specific when you tell me why your life is worth more than mine.

Hetero heirs will lose property to Gay Partners.

Well, golly gee, didja ever think maybe the DECEASED wanted it that way?!

More competition for adoptions.

And how many older, troubled, disabled, and/or otherwise "undesirable" children have you adopted so far? Any crack babies in your home? AIDS babies?

I thought not.

Some heteros are just attached to the Websters Dictionary's definition of marriage.

And that's the least of my worries, after reading your post. In your little world, it's perfectly moral and reasonable to actively deny an entire segment of the population the rights you enjoy, because you got yours, so fuck everybody else.

I have never heard anything so selfish in my life. Well, at least I've never heard it admitted so openly and shamelessly.

The middle has to be comfortable with Gays before anything will happen.

I hate to be the one to break it to you, but you don't represent anything even remotely resembling "the middle." Where do you get these talking points?

Nobody is comfortable with anything forced on them.

And what, exactly, is being forced on you? If you don't like gay people, don't be one. And don't marry one of us.

You haven't the foggiest idea what it is to have anything "forced" on you. You want to see "forced"? You trade places with me, and have every last shred of security ripped from your privileged little life. YOU try maintaining a relationship from 8,000 miles away, because blind, narrowminded, selfish bigots refuse to let the two of you live together in your own country. YOU make the decision to leave the United States, your family, and your friends. YOU refrain from holding your spouse's hand on a walk through the park for fear of somebody beating you to death. Hell, YOU go to Houston and have a landscaper refuse to do your yard because SHE is a Christian, and SHE doesn't do business with people of YOUR kind.

You don't know jack about being "forced" to do anything. You know NOTHING about it. NOTHING.

Again I support Gay Marriage.

You really expect anyone to believe that?

God, you must think we're stupid.