Reverend_Smitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-28-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |
|
now how am I supposed to watch vintage Daily Show clips anymore? They don't put up the really old ones on the Comedy Central website and their interface sucks too
|
| -YouTube Takes Down Comedy Central Clips |
Randypiper |
Oct-28-06 11:15 AM |
#0 |
 -
awww for chrissakes |
Reverend_Smitty |
Oct-28-06 11:18 AM |
#1 |
  -
Doesn't anyone here understand what COPYRIGHTS are? |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 11:22 AM |
#2 |
| -
Google is going to lose money on this acquisition. |
MercutioATC |
Oct-28-06 11:25 AM |
#5 |
| -
And seven other sites will pop up to take YouTUBE's place. |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 11:31 AM |
#8 |
| -
Fair Use |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 11:54 AM |
#16 |
| -
You are forgetting about the fair use doctrine: |
originalpckelly |
Oct-28-06 11:57 AM |
#18 |
| -
Not only am I not forgetting about it, I have it posted and linked on my site |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 12:06 PM |
#19 |
| -
I disagree |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 12:47 PM |
#31 |
| -
lighten up those clips are like free |
xxqqqzme |
Oct-28-06 12:48 PM |
#32 |
| -
They get posted faster than they can be removed |
Generic Other |
Oct-28-06 11:23 AM |
#3 |
| -
I knew Google would be forced to neuter youtube.... |
Beelzebud |
Oct-28-06 11:23 AM |
#4 |
| -
$1.65B will do that to you... |
MercutioATC |
Oct-28-06 11:28 AM |
#6 |
| -
How is it legal for Crooks and Liars but not YouTube? |
Randypiper |
Oct-28-06 11:36 AM |
#10 |
| -
Doesn't C&L post mainly NEWS stories? |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 11:48 AM |
#14 |
| -
Is CSpan NEWS?? |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 01:03 PM |
#40 |
| -
Nobody has apparently challenged them properly |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 02:24 PM |
#42 |
| -
CC should stop selling them and GIVE them away? |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 11:29 AM |
#7 |
| -
I understand why Google did what they did. |
Beelzebud |
Oct-28-06 11:37 AM |
#11 |
| -
Hey, come on...I'm perfectly calm. |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 11:45 AM |
#12 |
| -
Here is some food for thought from Comedy Central. |
Beelzebud |
Oct-28-06 11:55 AM |
#17 |
| -
That's not from Comedy Central. That's from Jon Stewart. NT |
NYCGirl |
Oct-28-06 12:08 PM |
#20 |
| -
So why aren't they more concerned? It's their show. |
Beelzebud |
Oct-28-06 12:18 PM |
#23 |
| -
They work for Comedy Central. They don't own it. NT |
NYCGirl |
Oct-28-06 12:34 PM |
#24 |
| -
It is called "work for hire." |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 12:40 PM |
#26 |
| -
Blindly worshipping at the altar of copyright is just as bad as trying to destroy it. n/t |
kgfnally |
Oct-28-06 12:12 PM |
#21 |
| -
Well, ain't that a pantload! |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 12:18 PM |
#22 |
| -
Thank you for publicly and extravagantly missing the point. n/t |
kgfnally |
Oct-28-06 12:43 PM |
#28 |
| -
Perhaps, then, you might expand beyond the subject line, eh? |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 12:51 PM |
#33 |
| -
Oh please, it's free damned advertising |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 12:52 PM |
#34 |
| -
Service again takes a back seat to greed. |
fiziwig |
Oct-28-06 11:36 AM |
#9 |
| -
Comedy Central is not a service company. They sell a product. NT |
NYCGirl |
Oct-28-06 11:47 AM |
#13 |
| -
and Youtube is free product advertisement... |
montana500 |
Oct-28-06 12:43 PM |
#27 |
| -
That's why they host clips on Comedy Central's website. They'd rather you |
NYCGirl |
Oct-28-06 12:44 PM |
#29 |
| -
And people comment on television |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 12:58 PM |
#37 |
| -
But the point STILL is, it is CC's property, and only they have the right... |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 02:25 PM |
#43 |
| -
What about Webb's book? |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 02:31 PM |
#48 |
| -
Yes, as a matter of fact. Quoting a book is perfectly legit. |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 02:34 PM |
#49 |
| -
Free speech isn't limited to news |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 02:36 PM |
#52 |
| -
Tell it to the judge. |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 02:49 PM |
#54 |
| -
Their website stinks.... |
montana500 |
Oct-28-06 01:19 PM |
#41 |
| -
Then write to them an tell them. But don't steal their products. |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 02:26 PM |
#44 |
| -
Stealing requires intent to permanently deprive. |
kiahzero |
Oct-28-06 03:55 PM |
#57 |
| -
You're correct. "Stealing" does imply something different, copyright-wise. |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 04:41 PM |
#61 |
| -
Nonsense |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 12:54 PM |
#35 |
| -
Or free speech and the right to criticize |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 01:00 PM |
#39 |
| -
It is NOT the same thing! |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 02:27 PM |
#45 |
| -
It doesn't matter |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 02:34 PM |
#50 |
| -
How you get from stealing other's property to "free speech?" |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 02:39 PM |
#53 |
| -
Yes, in fact, you DO |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 03:02 PM |
#55 |
| -
And how many copyrights do YOU hold? Magazines have you published? |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 03:50 PM |
#56 |
| -
YouTUBE isn't reselling anything |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 04:24 PM |
#59 |
| -
They can because you just granted them permission in writing. |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 04:40 PM |
#60 |
| -
Oh for pete's sake |
sandnsea |
Oct-28-06 05:22 PM |
#63 |
| -
They might put up their own channel |
chat_noir |
Oct-28-06 11:51 AM |
#15 |
| -
That is a direct result of "the google" purchase my guess. |
lonestarnot |
Oct-28-06 12:39 PM |
#25 |
| -
My guess is that it would've happened anyway. Google is just a bigger target |
NYCGirl |
Oct-28-06 12:45 PM |
#30 |
| -
Once again, DUers decide that an inconvenient law should be ignored |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 12:56 PM |
#36 |
| -
You are right, but strange that the "right" thing occurred after |
lonestarnot |
Oct-28-06 12:58 PM |
#38 |
| -
I don't argue that point! |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 02:29 PM |
#46 |
| -
Huge mistake. |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-28-06 02:30 PM |
#47 |
| -
And after all is taken down... |
survivor999 |
Oct-28-06 02:35 PM |
#51 |
| -
What's Colbert gonna do? |
liberalpragmatist |
Oct-28-06 03:56 PM |
#58 |
| -
Maybe nothing. There is nothing "to do" if one party doesn't feel agrieved. |
Atman |
Oct-28-06 04:44 PM |
#62 |
| -
Hmm. I just showed my girls the green screen challenge. |
phylny |
Oct-28-06 06:36 PM |
#64 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread