You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: It's the truth... I signed up for a peace group, I gave to [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-26-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. It's the truth... I signed up for a peace group, I gave to
Edited on Thu Jan-26-06 02:02 PM by converted_democrat
nearly every pac that acts like it has a clue, and I've donated to every Dem canidate I think puts out some effort.. In return, my mail is snooped through, and my husband is losing county contracts that we have held for years..

I wrote back in Aug. on DU about how our mail was being gone through, back before we even knew about the snooping stuff. My ass is on the line here, thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -I am very, very disappointed... kentuck  Jan-26-06 01:24 PM   #0 
  - It could be time to elect some real Democrats.  Vincardog   Jan-26-06 01:26 PM   #1 
  - or it could be too late  oldtime dfl_er   Jan-26-06 01:28 PM   #6 
  - It was up to the Judiciary Committee hearings. Media spun fulltime against  blm   Jan-26-06 01:27 PM   #2 
  - BLM, You Have To Stop Blaming The Media. The Democrats Need To  cryingshame   Jan-27-06 09:43 AM   #60 
     - I agree...  Totally Committed   Jan-28-06 01:44 PM   #64 
  - disappointed????  leftchick   Jan-26-06 01:27 PM   #3 
  - Thank you  OldLeftieLawyer   Jan-26-06 01:28 PM   #4 
  - I agree with you completely..  converted_democrat   Jan-26-06 01:30 PM   #8 
  - Seems to me the leadership HAS been fighting for you.  janeaustin   Jan-26-06 01:43 PM   #19 
  - Bullshit they have..There are a couple that are fighting, but that's it..  converted_democrat   Jan-26-06 01:50 PM   #26 
  - There's a communication block here, I think.  baby_mouse   Jan-26-06 02:09 PM   #34 
  - Your ass is on the line???  dl5192   Jan-26-06 01:53 PM   #29 
     - It's the truth... I signed up for a peace group, I gave to  converted_democrat   Jan-26-06 02:02 PM   #31 
     - Sounds interesting...  dl5192   Jan-26-06 02:36 PM   #37 
     - It isn't tin foil at all..  converted_democrat   Jan-26-06 03:36 PM   #41 
     - all democratic asses are on the line  leftchick   Jan-26-06 03:35 PM   #40 
        - WHO has folded?  janeaustin   Jan-26-06 03:55 PM   #43 
           - Take a good look at the legislation that has passed recently...  converted_democrat   Jan-26-06 04:29 PM   #53 
     - hell if it is  sproutster   Jan-27-06 09:45 AM   #61 
  - i am almost speechless. the minute they start fighting for it, yawl  seabeyond   Jan-26-06 01:33 PM   #11 
  - But there are no political consequences for not filibustering  Walt Starr   Jan-26-06 01:28 PM   #5 
  - Perhaps we can rationally find candidates to oppose them in the primaries.  acmejack   Jan-26-06 01:32 PM   #10 
     - Why the hell do you think they put it off until now?  Walt Starr   Jan-26-06 01:34 PM   #12 
        - I am patient & they have to run every two years.  acmejack   Jan-26-06 01:38 PM   #16 
           - Senators run every SIX years, not two.  Walt Starr   Jan-26-06 01:45 PM   #22 
              - Please Walt I fully understand that!  acmejack   Jan-26-06 01:59 PM   #30 
                 - I have a (D) Senator who is up for re-election this year  Walt Starr   Jan-26-06 02:03 PM   #32 
  - I haven't heard any fat ladies singing yet.  lonestarnot   Jan-26-06 01:29 PM   #7 
  - my gosh kentuck...... can you find something else to bitch about?  seabeyond   Jan-26-06 01:31 PM   #9 
  - Yeah, I could find something else to bitch about...  kentuck   Jan-26-06 01:39 PM   #17 
  - Seems to me that the Dem leaders have been downplaying the possibility  janeaustin   Jan-26-06 01:34 PM   #13 
  - You are probably correct...  kentuck   Jan-26-06 01:43 PM   #18 
  - It's damned tough, all right.  janeaustin   Jan-26-06 01:45 PM   #20 
     - Exactly why our leadership should have had the votes in line...  kentuck   Jan-26-06 01:48 PM   #23 
        - More likely they are behind closed doors saying  janeaustin   Jan-26-06 03:56 PM   #44 
  - Does anyone wonder if Harry Reid's pro-life stances on abortion...  calipendence   Jan-26-06 01:49 PM   #24 
     - "The only arm twisting that appears to be going on in the Democratic ranks  janeaustin   Jan-26-06 03:59 PM   #46 
        - The DLC is the one that just said they didn't want a fillibuster!  calipendence   Jan-26-06 04:35 PM   #55 
           - Dupe. Self delete.  janeaustin   Jan-27-06 08:36 AM   #57 
           - The DLC drives me nuts.  janeaustin   Jan-27-06 08:37 AM   #58 
  - Isn't it a little early for a postmortem? n/t  tasteblind   Jan-26-06 01:35 PM   #14 
  - Has there been a vote? A call for cloture?  Marnieworld   Jan-26-06 01:36 PM   #15 
  - I expect every REAL Democrat to vote against cloture...  calipendence   Jan-26-06 01:45 PM   #21 
  - Just say NO to the GOP!  janeaustin   Jan-26-06 01:49 PM   #25 
     - Gotta clean house inside first!  calipendence   Jan-26-06 01:53 PM   #28 
        - We don't have the luxury or the time to clean house first.  janeaustin   Jan-26-06 03:52 PM   #42 
           - We need to catapult the propaganda...  kentuck   Jan-26-06 03:57 PM   #45 
  - I swear, sometimes I wish I was a member of the brain dead  Vinca   Jan-26-06 01:51 PM   #27 
  - Won't we have 41 to support a filibuster? I thought we had 44  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-26-06 02:05 PM   #33 
  - Oh here I go-yes the gang of fourteen agreement  Generator   Jan-26-06 02:22 PM   #36 
  - You called it a long time ago.  MyPetRock   Jan-28-06 01:40 PM   #63 
  - It's getting down to the nitty-gritty...  kentuck   Jan-26-06 02:18 PM   #35 
  - I don't think they raised any expectations of a filibuster  orangepeel68   Jan-26-06 02:44 PM   #38 
  - You are probably correct...  kentuck   Jan-26-06 03:03 PM   #39 
  - The Democratic leadership never raised the expectations of a filibuster  Freddie Stubbs   Jan-26-06 04:00 PM   #47 
  - They've never raised expectations of representing us either!  calipendence   Jan-26-06 04:08 PM   #49 
  - Kentuck, I'm Not So Sure  Crisco   Jan-26-06 04:02 PM   #48 
  - There may still be hope...  kentuck   Jan-26-06 04:11 PM   #50 
  - What makes you think we are being told the whole truth  Midlodemocrat   Jan-26-06 04:13 PM   #51 
     - If this is true, it would be a devastating blow to the Repubs....  kentuck   Jan-26-06 04:15 PM   #52 
        - Yes. and keep hammering at them and hammering at them  Midlodemocrat   Jan-26-06 04:31 PM   #54 
        - A vote on the "nuclear option" would not require 60 votes...  PaganPreacher   Jan-26-06 11:01 PM   #56 
           - Thanks for the clarification!  kentuck   Jan-27-06 09:37 AM   #59 
              - No, it didn't change- clarification:  PaganPreacher   Jan-28-06 01:30 PM   #62 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC