BlueStater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-29-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
|
But our country can't survive another two years of this dipshit. If it is possible to pull his ass out office before 2009, I'm all for it.
|
| -Why Pelosi is Wrong About Impeachment-Forget Her "Pledge" She Took an Oath! |
kpete |
Oct-25-06 01:19 PM |
#0 |
-
If we allow the president to break laws and disregard our Constitution,... |
porphyrian |
Oct-25-06 01:21 PM |
#1 |
 -
Frankly, I trust her judgement about the best way to handle all this. |
SharonAnn |
Oct-25-06 09:11 PM |
#28 |
-
You are missing the point I made. |
porphyrian |
Oct-25-06 09:18 PM |
#30 |
-
For the 4,921st time |
WilliamPitt |
Oct-25-06 01:21 PM |
#2 |
 -
Why is that so hard to comprehend? |
Richardo |
Oct-25-06 01:24 PM |
#4 |
 -
Precisely. Here's the ad they would do if Pelosi was wishy-washy about it |
zulchzulu |
Oct-25-06 01:25 PM |
#5 |
 -
Stop! You're making too much sense! Makes my head hurt! |
Shakespeare |
Oct-25-06 01:32 PM |
#7 |
 -
the notion that Pelosi is lying for political gain is not very comforting. . . |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 06:36 PM |
#10 |
  -
She's not lying. She's saying the agenda we're running on isn't impeachment. |
impeachdubya |
Oct-25-06 06:46 PM |
#13 |
 -
Until they are crystal clear about their willingness. . . |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 07:30 PM |
#14 |
 -
I think you need to re-read exactly what she said. |
impeachdubya |
Oct-25-06 07:35 PM |
#15 |
 -
"Ever" doesn't change meaning. . . |
pat_k |
Oct-26-06 07:26 AM |
#51 |
 -
You're interfering with a perfectly good circular firing squad, Pitt. |
impeachdubya |
Oct-25-06 06:45 PM |
#12 |
  -
Unequivocal NO was completely unnecessary. |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 07:38 PM |
#17 |
 -
Again, I think you need to re-read what she actually said. |
impeachdubya |
Oct-25-06 07:47 PM |
#19 |
 -
"If evidence comes out that this. . ." |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 09:47 PM |
#31 |
 -
You aren't going to have the evidence in anything resembing the form it |
impeachdubya |
Oct-25-06 10:04 PM |
#32 |
 -
Step 1: Open a mouth, tell the truth, and accuse Bush and Cheney |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 11:21 PM |
#38 |
 -
You are correct, thats the way I see it |
kster |
Oct-25-06 09:15 PM |
#29 |
 -
So are you saying that Pelosi is lying to secure votes? |
magellan |
Oct-25-06 11:39 PM |
#41 |
 -
maybe we could get 2% if we promised to impeach. |
tomp |
Oct-25-06 11:44 PM |
#43 |
 -
And after this election, it'll be about the next election. |
Orsino |
Oct-26-06 12:44 PM |
#56 |
-
Particularly when she could even have accomplished her wrong-headed goal . . |
pat_k |
Oct-29-06 12:03 PM |
#59 |
-
So we Impeach Bush and Cheney and Pelosi becomes president |
davepc |
Oct-25-06 01:22 PM |
#3 |
 -
They should go after Cheney first, get him out and let Bush choose... |
Cooley Hurd |
Oct-25-06 01:31 PM |
#6 |
  -
You got it -- but they don't need to go after them in order. Just say. . . |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 07:50 PM |
#21 |
 -
Not at all -- Bushcheney can keep a Repub Pres -- It's their choice. |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 07:42 PM |
#18 |
-
Why would they do that? |
davepc |
Oct-25-06 08:53 PM |
#26 |
-
When the threat of impeachment becomes real, he could be out in a month. . ... |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 10:39 PM |
#36 |
-
Bullshit. |
cali |
Oct-29-06 12:13 PM |
#61 |
-
Just because Pelosi is Minority Leader... |
LiberalFighter |
Oct-25-06 02:16 PM |
#8 |
 -
The insider process. . . |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 06:41 PM |
#11 |
-
The only "pledge" is inside the heads of the people who want to tear down |
impeachdubya |
Oct-25-06 07:37 PM |
#16 |
-
Kick and Recommend for SANITY!!! |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 06:33 PM |
#9 |
-
deja vu - do we need to rehash this every day? |
greeneyedboy |
Oct-25-06 07:49 PM |
#20 |
 -
If your characterization of what she said is true. . . |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 07:56 PM |
#23 |
-
pay attention to politicianspeak for 2 days... |
greeneyedboy |
Oct-25-06 08:08 PM |
#24 |
 -
Yes. That's what they are doing -- and it is a monumental mistake. |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 10:06 PM |
#33 |
-
it's not brain surgery, but it is a science. |
greeneyedboy |
Oct-26-06 12:29 AM |
#46 |
-
No. Two years ago. . . |
pat_k |
Oct-26-06 01:00 AM |
#48 |
-
I think that's an over-reaction |
Patchuli |
Oct-25-06 08:25 PM |
#25 |
-
Can't put my hands on it at the moment. . . |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 10:32 PM |
#34 |
-
Well I can't say I was happy about how she stated it, |
Patchuli |
Oct-26-06 10:38 AM |
#53 |
-
Darn Right -- Get our Clicksticks out Nov. 8th!! |
pat_k |
Oct-26-06 11:16 AM |
#54 |
-
Whatever!! |
Dawgs |
Oct-25-06 07:51 PM |
#22 |
-
Absolutely. |
mmonk |
Oct-25-06 08:58 PM |
#27 |
 -
My anger at Pelosi won't sap my support for Dem candidates. . . |
pat_k |
Oct-26-06 12:32 AM |
#47 |
-
Subpoena power and Conyers. |
mmonk |
Oct-26-06 07:35 AM |
#52 |
-
It Should not be Off the Table |
benny05 |
Oct-25-06 10:35 PM |
#35 |
 -
Impeachment IS Our Positive Agenda! |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 11:31 PM |
#39 |
-
but, but after we attain the majority, a magical dust will drift down |
notsodumbhillbilly |
Oct-25-06 11:09 PM |
#37 |
 -
. . . and a magical solution to "Rule by Signing Statement" will materialize. . . |
pat_k |
Oct-25-06 11:43 PM |
#42 |
-
'she and other |
The Brethren |
Oct-25-06 11:35 PM |
#40 |
 -
Hear, Hear!! |
pat_k |
Oct-26-06 12:13 AM |
#45 |
-
I'm sure she reserves the right to change her mind |
Mr_Spock |
Oct-25-06 11:44 PM |
#44 |
-
Good for her. Don't let them frame the debate and set the terms. |
kdpeters |
Oct-26-06 01:26 AM |
#49 |
-
Did you ever watch 'Heathers'? |
alittlelark |
Oct-26-06 01:35 AM |
#50 |
 -
Sorry |
BlueStater |
Oct-29-06 12:09 PM |
#60 |
-
with 11 days left until the election, you think attacking Pelosi is a top priority? |
greeneyedboy |
Oct-26-06 12:27 PM |
#55 |
-
Remember all of John Conyers' & Henry Waxman's hard work... |
8_year_nightmare |
Oct-26-06 01:43 PM |
#57 |
-
What excuses their dereliction of duty until {date uncertain}? |
pat_k |
Oct-27-06 11:56 PM |
#58 |