You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #53: References About Cash Payments To Grossman [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
randyconspiracybuff Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #42
53. References About Cash Payments To Grossman
OK, I will be careful here. Following the Sibel Edmonds case requires developing a skill of inferring what she seems to be trying to point to but is not allowed to say explicitly.

Sibel has made repeated references to the State Department being the most corrupt branch of government. Before she found a way to bring Grossman's name up without breaking her gag order (she first mentioned Grossman's name to Chris Deliso in November '05), she insisted, according to Daniel Ellsberg, that "people in the State Department take cash" (this is from an untranscribed interview between Ellsberg and Kris Welch of KPFA from Sept. '05).

One more thing, the Vanity Fair article an "Inconvenient Patriot" states the following: "a Turkish official spoke directly to a U.S. State Department staffer. They suggested that the State Department staffer would send a representative at an appointed time to the American-Turkish Council office, at 1111 14th St. NW, where he would be given $7,000 in cash. She told us shed heard mention of exchanges of information, dead dropsthat kind of thing, a congressional source says. It was mostly money in exchange for secrets.

I don't know if Grossman would qualify as a "staffer". But if he does, that would put him as my top candidate for the taker of the $7,000 bribe.

So basically, I am making the inferrence that Grossman was leaking and he was leaking for financial gain.

I don't have any specific statement from Sibel or anyone else that Grossman took cash bribes. But I have deduced, not with absolute certainty, but with over 50% probability in my estimation, that this is what is alleged to have occurred. But it's open for debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC