You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Sure, NOW the anthrax was no longer weapons grade ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sure, NOW the anthrax was no longer weapons grade ...
and yet, more potent than the leftover "chemical weapons" that Iraq had left over from before Gulf I, that Bush and company said was such a threat to our country ...

Remember, in the early days of the war, the soldiers were not responding to "Democracy threats" when they had to put on their biohazard suits when the alarms sounded ... they were "prepped" for chem/bio warfare ... not "liberation" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC