You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: You got it. Contradictions in this ruling [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-17-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You got it. Contradictions in this ruling
Edited on Sun Sep-17-06 09:44 AM by UTUSN
1) Contradicts existing law.

2) Allows for cherrypicking claims -----deny the weakest one, not even consider the other ones that might be valid and----ZAP!!1-----the valid ones are denied into the bargain!!!1

3) No notice of denial, restricting appeals rights.


Is there going to be no higher court reconsideration of this? The VAWatchdog.org site is excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC