You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: No flame here but a different perspective.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
FedUpWithIt All Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-16-06 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. No flame here but a different perspective....
Edited on Sat Sep-16-06 12:27 AM by FedUpWithIt All
My daughter is 14. She has two close male friends.

One of the boys has developed a crush on me. He is a shy boy and i do not feel uncomfortable with the way he feels. It is a harmless part of growing up. He simply gets flustered when i am around. The other boy originally found out that suggesting that i am "hot" would get a funny response from my daughter and a bit of male jest between him and his male friend. Somehow my comfort level changed with this boy's comment. The use of the word "hot" from a 15 yr old boy made me extremely uncomfortable. It is different somehow.

The reason i mentioned these boys was to ask whether this discussion is getting a false result because of the fact that the damage is already done? Does perspective change when the situation is looked at from the other end? Surely, none of the responders of the poll are suggesting that a woman respond when an adolescent makes an advance. Do the assertions that no lasting damage would be done to a boy in a case like the LaFave case still apply when one is looking at a scenario from this angle? If it does not then maybe we should ask why. Perhaps, it is because in a situation that has already occurred is safe to dissect against the backdrop of fantasy. Whereas one that has not, the true realities of the implications arise.

I have been reading the poll thread you started. I remember when the case first was revealed. Around that time there was another case with very similar circumstances save one detail...the teacher in that case was not physically attractive. Men, who on the one hand were declaring their desire for a similar opportunity in the adolescent years with someone like LaFave, immediately decried the trauma to the young boy in the other case. There were calls for the "ugly" woman's imprisonment. THIS is the problem with this type of situation. The double standard in not so much one of male vrs. female but of something more...i dunno, uglier.


Edited for clarity. Very tired. :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC