You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #56: You seem intelligent [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #39
56. You seem intelligent
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 01:21 PM by omega minimo
There is a difference b/w having "a problem with disproportionate media coverage of missing white women" AND making derogatory, bigoted, stereotyped, dehumanizing comments about the real people involved, dismissing them as "blonde white girls" "dead white chicks" etc. These show up too often in "liberal" rhetoric, including on DU, including in OP Titles, including this morning.

Trivializing the issue by dehumanizing the women involved is bigoted. The people doing it while they think they are criticizing the media, are perpetuating the stereotypes and contributing to the problem. They are feeding right into the media hand that they supposedly object to.

Because it is "only" women, it's not seen -- by some -- for the bigotry it is.

Your wife may see the problem and still find a way to talk about it without yapping about "blonde white girls" or "dead blonde white chicks."

It's possible to do both. :hi:



Marie26 (1000+ posts)  Sun Sep-03-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #22
36. Not to mention
that it seems to extend to any story about a female victim of crime. I can't remember how many times I've read DU'ers dismiss a story about a woman who was murdered or abused w/derision & whines about Natalie Holloway. Even when Jill Carroll was kidnapped, numerous DU'ers called her a "blonde white girl" distraction, despite the fact that she was a respected journalist captured in a war zone. That would have been a big story no matter what, but because the American journalist was a young woman, the story was dismissed by some people. That's where it crosses the line into outright sexism, IMO.

(providing these posts to save you some time :evilgrin: )--edit for:

H2O Man (1000+ posts)  Sun Sep-03-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
41. True.
Our goal should be building a foundation of knowledge, building upon that base with passion and compassion, and making progress through enlightenment. The rabid thinking that results in the ugly anti- white, blonde females, exposes the sickness in some of the democratic left. Attempting to justify this virus of hatred by pointing to a fault in the corporate media is shameful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC