Reply #36: ...

[Spider Jerusalem]

You can 'consider various combinations of ideas' all you like; that doesn't change the fact that the particular combination of ideas you're considering has absolutely nothing to do with anything that I said and is therefore completely asinine by way of response.

And it's certainly possible to own something that one did not inherit, but conversely if one may not dispose of something one owns as one sees fit (by inheritance or otherwise), then one can't be said to 'own' it in any meaningful sense, only to have the use of it in one's lifetime; therefore, you necessarily imply that under this doctrine of yours none but American Indians should have the right of land ownership.