You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #111: Yes he did I believe it was concerning marking of chemicals [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)

underpants

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Aug-17-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #102

111. Yes he did I believe it was concerning marking of chemicals

Hatch said that terrorism was a phoney threat and accused Clinton of fearmongering*. That is why you didn't see Hatch for a good 4 months or so after 9/11. He was completely out of sight

*notice the difference between a foreign government falling into and breaking up the Bojinka operation in 1995 and how W&Co. have treated (forced we know now) the Brits to arrest the would be alleged liquid bombers. Fear monger this you crusty old ... I'm stopping there :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.