You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: He also drinks no-peak-oil koolaid... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-17-06 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. He also drinks no-peak-oil koolaid...
Apparently he thinks that Hubbert and the Peak Oil community claim that the "peak" means that production comes to a complete and abrupt halt once the peak has been reached - which would be just about now, which is the basis for Palast to claim that Hubbert got it all wrong.


No Peaking: The Hubbert Humbug
by Greg Palast
Tue, 23 May 2006 07:23:33 -0700
http://www.gnn.tv/articles/2295/No_Peaking_The_Hubbert_...

<snip>

"In his 1956 paper, Hubbert wrote:

On the basis of the present estimates of the ultimate reserves of world petroleum and natural gas, it appears that the culmination of world production of these products should occur within a half a century (i.e., by 2006).

So get in your Hummer and take your last drive, Clive. Sometime during 2006, we will have used up every last drop of crude oil on the planet. Were not talking decline in oil from a production peak, were talking culmination, completely gone, kaput, dead out of crudeand not enough natural gas left to roast a weenie. In his 1956 treatise, Hubbert wrote that Planet Earth could produce not a drop more than one and a quarter trillion barrels of crude."

<more>


Though i generally love his work, the best i can make of this is that it is a very stupid mistake on Palast's part. Palast has quite a reputation as an investigative journalist, but his investigation of Peak Oil is extremely sloppy, which damages that reputation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC