You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #66: I think that going negative on Lamont [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-11-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
66. I think that going negative on Lamont
really hurt Lieberman. Let him keep it up. So far the two things he's been able to say about Lamont is that he is rich (so were JFK and FDR) and that he belonged to an exclusive club. Now he is using the ever more tiring argument of Liberals soft on teror. As the days and weeks go by Lieberman will get more negative, more shrill, more whiney. In the meantime Lamont is looking more cool and composed, more confident and more positive about the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC