You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Sept 11th - Unanswered Questions By MalcontentX - Tuesday, 19 Feb. 2002 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-03-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Sept 11th - Unanswered Questions By MalcontentX - Tuesday, 19 Feb. 2002
"We to this day don't know why NORAD told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. "It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
- WASHPOST - August 2, 2006


Hey Mark,

Nice to see you.

For people interested in knowing the background to yesterday's bombshell the following is a link to the article that launched tens of millions of inquiring minds directly into what may be known as the NORAD LIES..... I still do not know who MalcontentX is.. but I do know he has recorded a musical about this now!

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0202/S00079.htm
INVESTIGATION: Sept 11th - Unanswered Questions
Tuesday, 19 February 2002, 1:33 pm
Article: The Scoop Editor
SCOOP EDITORS NOTE: The following detailed analysis of the events of September 11th was submitted to Scoop by its author with a request that it be republished. It also appears at http://www.communitycurrency.org/MainIndexMX.html where the embedded references are formatted as hyperlinks. While this analysis follows closely in the footsteps of analysis from The Emperor?s New Clothes (tenc.net) it is considerably more complete and thorough in its scope. Like the TENC.NET analysis of 911 previously published by Scoop (see also...part 2 and part 3) and that of Michael Rowbotham, its implications are deeply disturbing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC