You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: Then what did you mean in your first post? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Then what did you mean in your first post?
You said: Maybe this is just basic selection.

And what you clearly meant by that would be expressed by adding "as opposed to actual evolution" on the end. Because the article did not differentiate - you did. You seemed to indicate you thought a population had to become a whole new species before evolution could be declared to have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Finches named for Darwin are evolving tocqueville  Jul-13-06 02:34 PM   #0 
  - Im not sure  kwolf68   Jul-13-06 02:37 PM   #1 
  - Expressing alleles due to competitive pressures...  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-13-06 02:38 PM   #2 
  - I know that  kwolf68   Jul-13-06 02:42 PM   #4 
     - The process is called evolution.  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-13-06 02:46 PM   #6 
     - Sure....  kwolf68   Jul-13-06 02:49 PM   #8 
        - Sorry, that is an incorrect understanding of evolution.  trotsky   Jul-13-06 02:51 PM   #10 
           - I am trying to discuss this from the standpoint  kwolf68   Jul-13-06 03:00 PM   #13 
              - Then what did you mean in your first post?  trotsky   Jul-13-06 03:19 PM   #19 
                 - The article most certainly did differeniate  kwolf68   Jul-13-06 03:34 PM   #21 
                    - Yeah, you did "take off" on that angle.  trotsky   Jul-13-06 03:52 PM   #22 
                       - Just lovely.  kwolf68   Jul-13-06 04:20 PM   #23 
                          - So you're still going to stand by your statement...  trotsky   Jul-14-06 07:26 AM   #25 
     - Strawberry-flavored evolution vs vanilla-flavored.  longship   Jul-13-06 03:04 PM   #15 
        - Are you kidding?  kwolf68   Jul-13-06 03:09 PM   #18 
  - That's evolution in a nutshell  LynneSin   Jul-13-06 02:46 PM   #7 
  - sort of -- there's NEW finch that was competeing for the same seeds  xchrom   Jul-13-06 02:56 PM   #11 
  - Yes I have heard of the elephants  kwolf68   Jul-13-06 03:02 PM   #14 
     - i know -- i LOVE that!  xchrom   Jul-13-06 05:39 PM   #24 
  - I understand that  kwolf68   Jul-13-06 02:57 PM   #12 
  - Would still be evolution.  sparosnare   Jul-13-06 03:08 PM   #17 
  - There was a study in the 1950's on foxes  berni_mccoy   Jul-13-06 03:26 PM   #20 
  - They're not evolving. God thought he'd design a few with smaller  xultar   Jul-13-06 02:39 PM   #3 
  - of course they're evolving-- all animals are evolving....  mike_c   Jul-13-06 02:43 PM   #5 
  - The finches not named for Darwin are also evolving.  FSogol   Jul-13-06 02:50 PM   #9 
  - Shh! Don't tell the Fundies. Their pea brains might explode!  mom cat   Jul-13-06 03:07 PM   #16 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC