Reply #72: Again, do you vote exclusively on Iraq?

[skipos]

I realize it is far from a single issue, just as it is far from encompassing everything a a senator ever votes on.

McGavick supports the War 100%, and looks to have all of the usual anti-woman, anti-poor, anti-environment stances that you'd expect from a Republican.

If non-Iraq issues mean little to you, if a Democratic majority and all the leadership positions that come with that means little to you, if McGavick's right wing policies don't bother you, I could see not voting for Cantwell.

I know some people will feel that way, I guess I just can't relate. America would be so much better off with a Democratic majority, and I couldn't live with myself if I didn't do everything I could to make it happen.

McGavick or Cantwell is going to be sitting in that senate seat, no ifs ands or buts. It is easy to see which of the two would be the better choice for America. IMO of course. :)