You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #3: "Imperial Presidency" must be the meme. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
moc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Imperial Presidency" must be the meme.
They were saying the other day that the "man on the street" doesn't get what "unitary executive" means and why it is so awful.

We need to call it "imperial presidency", because that's what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -NYT SMACKS KING BUSH!!! "The Imperial Presidency at Work" kpete  Jan-14-06 10:02 PM   #0 
  - Noly crap! NYT sees the writing on the wall!  Cooley Hurd   Jan-14-06 10:05 PM   #1 
  - Example of how Bush* uses signing statements  Toots   Jan-15-06 09:08 AM   #55 
  - Great article  senseandsensibility   Jan-14-06 10:06 PM   #2 
  - "Imperial Presidency" must be the meme.  moc   Jan-14-06 10:09 PM   #3 
  - Forget 'unitary executive' or 'imperial presidency'  StopThePendulum   Jan-14-06 10:23 PM   #7 
  - That's exactly the truth.  JWS   Jan-14-06 10:41 PM   #14 
  - I agree  PATRICK   Jan-15-06 08:33 AM   #54 
  - The Imperial Presidency ....  H2O Man   Jan-14-06 10:50 PM   #22 
  - Dictatorial Presidency or Tyrannical Presidency work for me.  Pacifist Patriot   Jan-15-06 06:56 AM   #50 
  - Someone say dictator?  hootinholler   Jan-15-06 10:45 AM   #59 
  - Tyrant. Absolute monarch. If he has power to do any thing he damn well...  hvn_nbr_2   Jan-15-06 11:14 AM   #61 
  - The Word You Are Looking for is DICTATORSHIP  AndyTiedye   Jan-15-06 02:08 AM   #48 
  - Totally Great Summation. Also Terrifying. I Look To The Day When  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jan-14-06 10:09 PM   #4 
  - And this is my thank you letter:  aquart   Jan-14-06 10:15 PM   #5 
  - Excellent response!! They are a few years to late with this one.  driver8   Jan-15-06 10:05 PM   #69 
  - This is an important lesson in the history of America. Congress should  The Backlash Cometh   Jan-14-06 10:16 PM   #6 
  - Well assuming congress is made up of rational human beings...  mcctatas   Jan-14-06 10:24 PM   #8 
  - Congress did because they felt they had to as a consequence of 9/11.  Beam Me Up   Jan-15-06 02:32 AM   #49 
  - Kicked and nominated, damn it! However, if the NY Times  journalist3072   Jan-14-06 10:29 PM   #9 
  - Tonight --- I welcome the NYT back to America  kpete   Jan-14-06 10:33 PM   #11 
     - I'm afraid we'll have to keep waiting on that one  journalist3072   Jan-14-06 10:39 PM   #12 
     - Alito confirmation  Petreader   Jan-14-06 10:45 PM   #17 
     - not kidding, just hoping  kpete   Jan-14-06 10:48 PM   #19 
     - I agree ... the repugs will add this criminal to the supremes ...  WhereThereIsFire   Jan-15-06 12:57 AM   #43 
     - I predict some Executive Editorial personnel changes at the NYTimes.  TahitiNut   Jan-15-06 12:35 AM   #42 
     - The NYT has a lot more work to do before I welcome them back...  driver8   Jan-15-06 10:07 PM   #70 
  - The NYT will not regain my respect until it begins to tell the truth.  Beam Me Up   Jan-14-06 10:33 PM   #10 
  - I don't consider NYT as a trust worthy news source  DELUSIONAL   Jan-14-06 10:40 PM   #13 
  - The NYTimes is probably the worst news corporation  JWS   Jan-14-06 10:43 PM   #16 
  - "A BEGINNING"  kpete   Jan-14-06 10:42 PM   #15 
  - We're willing to take any amo she'll give us but its going to take more,  Beam Me Up   Jan-14-06 10:56 PM   #27 
  - Yeah, let's see how many snide remarks creep into the coverage of Gore's  Gloria   Jan-15-06 01:05 AM   #44 
  - I'm waiting for them to expose the issue of election fraud  Pacifist Patriot   Jan-15-06 06:57 AM   #51 
  - Wakey, wakey Mr. Sulzberger  gratuitous   Jan-14-06 10:47 PM   #18 
  - Shoot! Which DU'er said that Miers was just a distraction....  Dr_eldritch   Jan-14-06 10:48 PM   #20 
  - I came to that conclusion and posted it in a thread of Neil's.  sfexpat2000   Jan-14-06 10:52 PM   #24 
  - I just wish that the Times had had a companion piece  missouri dem 2   Jan-14-06 10:49 PM   #21 
  - Holy Crap is right!  hopeisaplace   Jan-14-06 10:51 PM   #23 
  - "All the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand..."  farmbo   Jan-14-06 10:52 PM   #25 
  - Btw, kpete, the NYT public editor sent me an acknowledgment  sfexpat2000   Jan-14-06 10:54 PM   #26 
  - Please translate sfexpat  kpete   Jan-14-06 10:56 PM   #28 
  - I posted a thread calling out the NYT for sitting on the NSA  sfexpat2000   Jan-14-06 11:05 PM   #33 
  - Do you have a link to that thread? I don't want to miss it.  Beam Me Up   Jan-14-06 10:58 PM   #29 
     - Do you mean the original thread? That is here:  sfexpat2000   Jan-14-06 11:01 PM   #31 
        - Yes, that is what I meant, thanks!  Beam Me Up   Jan-14-06 11:03 PM   #32 
        - Were you talking to me?  sfexpat2000   Jan-14-06 11:06 PM   #35 
        - you have humbled me  kpete   Jan-14-06 11:05 PM   #34 
           - I don't understand? Lol!  sfexpat2000   Jan-14-06 11:08 PM   #36 
              - sometimes my optimism gets in the way of my sanity  kpete   Jan-14-06 11:15 PM   #37 
  - too little, WAY too late  Skittles   Jan-14-06 11:00 PM   #30 
  - Buyers remorse?  gulfcoastliberal   Jan-15-06 12:14 AM   #40 
  - Sad smile....  Dan   Jan-14-06 11:15 PM   #38 
  - All hail to the chief  savemefromdumbya   Jan-14-06 11:54 PM   #39 
  - The NYT is a billion days late and a trillion dollars short  Rageneau   Jan-15-06 12:19 AM   #41 
  - when you put it like this, I really see this point and worry  hopeisaplace   Jan-15-06 01:18 AM   #46 
  - Shit it is about time  f-bush   Jan-15-06 01:10 AM   #45 
  - Kick. Thanks Kpete for posting. "Bush's expansion of power" endangers  oasis   Jan-15-06 01:19 AM   #47 
  - About. FUCKING . Time.  WilliamPitt   Jan-15-06 07:03 AM   #52 
  - Who will take down b***?  greiner3   Jan-15-06 07:35 AM   #53 
  - If "Imperial Presidency" is too many syllables for some folks to chaw on..  Dunvegan   Jan-15-06 09:45 AM   #56 
  - For God's sake, can we, at least, try for a FILIBUSTER...  DeepModem Mom   Jan-15-06 10:17 AM   #57 
  - don't you wish the US had an oppostion political party that opposes? nt  msongs   Jan-15-06 10:19 AM   #58 
  - How is it that the right  YankeyMCC   Jan-15-06 10:56 AM   #60 
  - Is the NYT bear coming out of hibernation?  hvn_nbr_2   Jan-15-06 11:18 AM   #62 
  - Filabuster, filabuster, filabuster, filabuster, filabuster, filabuster.  mom cat   Jan-15-06 12:40 PM   #63 
  - Where were they when it would have been courageous to say this?  BrklynLiberal   Jan-15-06 02:13 PM   #64 
  - kpaete; KING of the "I will NOT post permalink" DUers  RazzleDazzle   Jan-15-06 05:49 PM   #65 
  - I am SO sorry  kpete   Jan-15-06 08:42 PM   #67 
     - Well, I for one  senseandsensibility   Jan-15-06 08:52 PM   #68 
  - Rec 50 ! Enough of the Imperial Residency! Kick the squatter out!  Melissa G   Jan-15-06 07:59 PM   #66 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC