Djinn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-07-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
because it's trash. Hillary may be progressive compared to some Dem's or even all Dem's (not I statement I'd make but anyway) but she sure as shit aint progressive from where I sit.
Her "mistake" in supporting the war is bullshit political expediency, it's not popular now so she decides she's against it, poll driven not soul driven.
If she really was simply "mistaken" or "tricked/lied" into supporting the war then she is abominably stupid and WAY WAY too dumb to be elected.
|
| -What would be the effect if Clinton came out strong against the Iraq war? |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 06:05 PM |
#0 |
 -
It wouldn't be pretty. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jun-07-06 06:06 PM |
#1 |
| -
she'd be called a flip-flopper |
Gato Moteado |
Jun-07-06 06:09 PM |
#2 |
  -
In your opinion, the only possibility is that she be "pretending"? |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 06:17 PM |
#5 |
| -
i never looked at her voting record but i have no doubt it's good.... |
Gato Moteado |
Jun-07-06 07:11 PM |
#9 |
| -
But WHY? That's what I've never understood. |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 07:13 PM |
#11 |
| -
her voting record DOES matter.... |
Gato Moteado |
Jun-07-06 08:47 PM |
#33 |
| -
I wont "admit" it |
Djinn |
Jun-07-06 09:14 PM |
#34 |
| -
I'm kinda neutral too |
DemonFighterLives |
Jun-07-06 06:12 PM |
#3 |
| -
God dammit Hillary... |
Placebo |
Jun-07-06 06:15 PM |
#4 |
| -
She's boxed herself in |
bluestateguy |
Jun-07-06 06:20 PM |
#6 |
| -
Yes she is boxed, because she didn't do the right thing at first. |
ktlyon |
Jun-07-06 06:31 PM |
#7 |
| -
She couldn't still be a Republican then.... |
WA98296 |
Jun-07-06 07:09 PM |
#8 |
| -
This sounds like nothing more than deliberate ignoring of... |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 07:11 PM |
#10 |
| -
Well, I care about her affinity for... |
WA98296 |
Jun-07-06 07:22 PM |
#12 |
| -
Ok. Put you down in the who-cares-about-voting-record column. |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 07:26 PM |
#13 |
| -
FLIP FLOPPER!!!! |
Terran1212 |
Jun-07-06 08:27 PM |
#30 |
| -
Once again, I dislike the assumption |
LittleClarkie |
Jun-07-06 07:28 PM |
#14 |
| -
Sorry - I meant to be ASKING what the reason was.... |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 07:34 PM |
#15 |
| -
But he was above all, a politician, and a good one as well |
LittleClarkie |
Jun-07-06 07:40 PM |
#16 |
| -
The two voting records aren't even remotely close to comparable. |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 07:54 PM |
#20 |
| -
You're using the word "comparable". I never did |
LittleClarkie |
Jun-07-06 08:02 PM |
#21 |
| -
You don't have to use the word "comparable" to say THAT... |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 08:06 PM |
#22 |
| -
Because of one comment you made |
LittleClarkie |
Jun-07-06 08:10 PM |
#25 |
| -
And that's just plain false. |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 08:15 PM |
#27 |
| -
You asked why. I told you. You insist that I'm comparing their records |
LittleClarkie |
Jun-07-06 08:29 PM |
#32 |
| -
ROFL! "some progressive site"! Um, what kind of site... |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 08:07 PM |
#23 |
| -
Couldn't fit it into one post, dear |
LittleClarkie |
Jun-07-06 08:11 PM |
#26 |
| -
ROFL! Who, pray tell, is "neutral", and who judges THAT? |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 08:16 PM |
#28 |
| -
A neutral site is one that tells me how someone voted |
LittleClarkie |
Jun-07-06 08:25 PM |
#29 |
| -
Right, sorry, I'm just frustrated and tired. |
WA98296 |
Jun-07-06 07:43 PM |
#18 |
| -
I think you apologized under the wrong post |
LittleClarkie |
Jun-07-06 07:45 PM |
#19 |
| -
Nothing Would Happen |
ThomWV |
Jun-07-06 07:42 PM |
#17 |
| -
It's just a matter of time (and the polls) until she does. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Jun-07-06 08:07 PM |
#24 |
| -
"flip-flop" label would begin for one |
upi402 |
Jun-07-06 08:27 PM |
#31 |
| -
Didn't Murtha initially support the war? |
BlooInBloo |
Jun-07-06 09:47 PM |
#35 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread