You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #26: Agree, "Willy" when Dems won't acknowlege that Gore's Election was [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Agree, "Willy" when Dems won't acknowlege that Gore's Election was
Stolen and won't even get behind "investigations" of Kerry...then we know there's BAD STUFF on our OWN SIDES...

But, we need to work to find who is dissing the Election Fraud issue ...who wan't to keep it from INVESTIGATION.

Because ANY DEMOCRAT who DOES THIS...needs to be PURGED...BIG TIME...THROWN OUT....!!!!1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Kennedy is getting trashed on Voting article,.Ed Schultz downplayed it & KoKo01  Jun-05-06 04:49 PM   #0 
  - *Aside* from that fact? hmm...  villager   Jun-05-06 04:51 PM   #1 
  - huh.........???????  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 05:32 PM   #6 
     - don't you remember your own last line?  villager   Jun-05-06 05:52 PM   #14 
  - There's already a response to the Salon error-filled fiasco of an article.  redqueen   Jun-05-06 04:51 PM   #2 
  - Schultz is hardly tied in with the dem establishment  warrens   Jun-05-06 04:52 PM   #3 
  - Word I heard was that Hillary and Daschle supported him...and he's Good!  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 05:37 PM   #8 
  - Ed Shultz is not clued into Dem establishment  in search of sanity   Jun-05-06 04:54 PM   #4 
  - Don't rely on the opening poster's observations... they usually are bent  cryingshame   Jun-05-06 04:56 PM   #5 
  - Are you talking about "ME" KoKo01 who has been here since 2001?  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 05:49 PM   #13 
     - So ....consensus of the posters on this thread is Schultz is not credible?  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 06:03 PM   #17 
  - How do you explain how Schultz got on the Radio, then?  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 05:40 PM   #10 
  - He's not a repuke plant. He's a Dem plant. They offered him BIG BUCKS  in_cog_ni_to   Jun-05-06 06:07 PM   #19 
     - Duh...Oh....I thought I said that here in my post and on this thread......  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 06:24 PM   #20 
        - Duh...Oh.....Fucking shit.  in_cog_ni_to   Jun-05-06 06:35 PM   #21 
           - Where did I say Schultz is a "f**in Repug Plant?  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 06:42 PM   #24 
              - Getting back to the "Point" of my Post! Why are Dems ignoring RFK's Post  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 06:44 PM   #25 
              - I gave my answer/theory a long time ago in post 9.  in_cog_ni_to   Jun-05-06 06:55 PM   #29 
              - KoKo, I was responding to post 10, not your OP. n/t  in_cog_ni_to   Jun-05-06 06:53 PM   #28 
                 - sorry...I'm still "dial up" and the sequence often is kind of garbled...  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 06:57 PM   #30 
                    - OK. n/t  in_cog_ni_to   Jun-05-06 07:00 PM   #32 
  - Yes he is. The big name Dems invited him and Randi to a house in DC  in_cog_ni_to   Jun-05-06 05:41 PM   #11 
     - Wow - That is IMPORTANT info - Schultz is an Entrenched Dem  IndyOp   Jun-05-06 09:06 PM   #47 
  - I have NO idea why they won't take it on  debbierlus   Jun-05-06 05:34 PM   #7 
  - Thanks....I don't know either...but at least you answered my question  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 06:06 PM   #18 
  - He's bought and paid for by the Dem establishment. Randi said so.  in_cog_ni_to   Jun-05-06 05:38 PM   #9 
  - I know that there's "bad blood" between Randi and Schultz ..but I think  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 05:44 PM   #12 
     - The story wasn't about bad blood between Randi and Ed.  in_cog_ni_to   Jun-05-06 05:52 PM   #15 
  - Big leap from Schultz to "Dem establishment." I call BS. nt  ariellyn   Jun-05-06 05:56 PM   #16 
  - I call bullshit, too.  Joe for Clark   Jun-05-06 06:42 PM   #23 
  - As I've Said Before...  WillyT   Jun-05-06 06:37 PM   #22 
  - Agree, "Willy" when Dems won't acknowlege that Gore's Election was  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 06:52 PM   #26 
  - PINK TUTU'S DANCING, DANCING, DANCING.....as the Lobbyist Money  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 06:53 PM   #27 
  - autism and other issues soared with mercury, now they are going  seabeyond   Jun-05-06 06:58 PM   #31 
  - There were posts that said RFK was shot down in credibility over Vaccines  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 07:02 PM   #34 
     - really. well i know a lot of du'ers didnt like him going after the mercury  seabeyond   Jun-05-06 07:06 PM   #36 
        - I attack Dems...but thought there were enough questions about Vaccines  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 07:55 PM   #42 
           - i dont know. i didnt hear anything. but i agree with you n/t  seabeyond   Jun-05-06 10:16 PM   # 
  - DEMs are too frightened out of their minds to say ANYTHING...  Dr Fate   Jun-05-06 07:01 PM   #33 
  - I get it...29% and they are still afraid..holding "powder dry" and waiting  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 07:08 PM   #37 
  - yaaaaawnnnnn....anyway (nt)  stepnw1f   Jun-05-06 07:03 PM   #35 
  - Yawwwwnnnn and Ho...Hum...why did you bother to read and reply?  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 07:17 PM   #40 
     - regarding "dissing"  zippy890   Jun-06-06 06:28 AM   #56 
  - ho hum  zippy890   Jun-05-06 07:08 PM   #38 
  - HERE IS THE DETAILED REBUTTAL  RonB   Jun-05-06 07:13 PM   #39 
  - Ask yourself this:  Junkdrawer   Jun-05-06 07:31 PM   #41 
  - True....but then you are saying "Massive Complicity" for years? Decades?  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 08:00 PM   #43 
     - Unfortunately that sounds about right.  The Gunslinger   Jun-05-06 08:27 PM   #44 
     - Many roads...all leading to, as you put it, "Massive Complicity"...  Junkdrawer   Jun-05-06 08:31 PM   #45 
  - Sorry...  Imajika   Jun-05-06 09:01 PM   #46 
  - And many more, like you, can't accept facts. n/t  ariellyn   Jun-05-06 09:21 PM   #48 
  - Gotta handy link for those articles (Salon / Blumenthal)?  Ladyhawk   Jun-05-06 10:02 PM   #52 
     - Here ya go...  Imajika   Jun-06-06 12:58 AM   #55 
        - Thank you. I'll get around to them, hopefully. I'd also like rebuttals  Ladyhawk   Jun-07-06 11:33 AM   #57 
  - Or, could some of them had  Cleita   Jun-05-06 09:22 PM   #49 
     - See my posts above. It's not that they benefit, but, if they play nice,  Junkdrawer   Jun-05-06 09:26 PM   #50 
     - I know that Dems have been trashed for decades about JFK's Election  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 09:51 PM   #51 
        - About the Supremes, this is beyond a non-intervention rule.  Cleita   Jun-05-06 10:06 PM   #53 
           - Agree....and since they stole that one...knowing how they play...one  KoKo01   Jun-05-06 10:16 PM   #54 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC