You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: Fitz is arguing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-19-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. Fitz is arguing
in response to Libby's motion to (try YET AGAIN) to compel discovery of any information Fitz may have relating to witnesses the defense could call, so as to avoid "minefields" (read: illegal activity in other areas of this case not related to these charges) they may encounter. Wells tries to plead that any information Fitz had which was created by, related to, or even has a whiff of any of these witnesses about it, should be turned over as part of the discovery.

Fitz said no. Now, to the judge.

Minefields, huh? Hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC