Reply #127: Bull Shit. The smoking gun is the free fall speed of the bldgs

[Trish1168]

I am a scientist. I know enough physics to understand that those buildings fell too fast. There was no resistance from below. That is ONLY possible in a controlled demolition scenario. I have seen the math and the calculations and witnessed (of course) how those buildings fell.

When the 'official' version defies the basic principles of science, as a scientist, I must stick with whatever hypothesis fits the data. Controlled demolition fits. Pancaking collapse does NOT! And while many scientists (credible and reputable) have supported the pancaking theory, I am not completely convinced that they were objective in their analysis. And no scientist that I have seen or heard or read has ever explained how it is scientifically possible for those buildings to have fallen at free fall speeds with the pancaking theory.

Do you have an explaination? Are you a scientist?

And I ask you, if it was a controlled demolition, do you suppose Al Qaeda infiltrated the port authority? Really, how was it possible unless it was actually broader than just the 19 Al Qaeda guys? Have you read the books? Have you seen the circumstances?

Stop being so closed minded. You guys remind me of the German people. After the prisoners were rescued from the camps, they marched the townspeople in to the camps and forced them to bear witness to the atrocities. Most refused to accept as possible that their government could do such things. Why are you guys so closed off to the possibility of government involvement? All the data in totality points in this direction.

Open your minds!!