You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: I think the point of a sealed indictment is that it is not a matter of [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. I think the point of a sealed indictment is that it is not a matter of
public record until it is unsealed. So even the fact that an indictment has been made, if it is a sealed indictment, would not publicly be disclosed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -If Rove's already been indicted, then why no MSM coverage? joemurphy  May-13-06 05:55 PM   #0 
  - you should start a thread about it  texasleo   May-13-06 05:56 PM   #1 
  - Because it's only a leak at this point...no announcement from Fitz yet.  MercutioATC   May-13-06 05:57 PM   #2 
  - You mean SCLM coverage?  karlrschneider   May-13-06 05:58 PM   #3 
  - Rove has 24 hours to respond....that was in the Truthout article.  Media_Lies_Daily   May-13-06 06:00 PM   #4 
  - No, that's not what it said.  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 06:06 PM   #7 
  - .  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 06:09 PM   #11 
     - .  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 06:11 PM   #12 
  - I think the order said Rove had 24 hours to get his affairs in order.  joemurphy   May-13-06 06:08 PM   #10 
  - How can that be anything but irrelevant?  DS1   May-13-06 06:11 PM   #13 
  - Many in the media know that the 04 election was stolen.  Botany   May-13-06 06:04 PM   #5 
  - It seems to be taking longer than Libby...but we need to remember that  KoKo01   May-13-06 06:06 PM   #6 
  - MSM is covering up for the bush cabal  alyce douglas   May-13-06 06:07 PM   #8 
  - Keeping lid on so chimp doesn't hear?  havocmom   May-13-06 06:07 PM   #9 
  - There are some problems with the article...it's vague, for one thing...  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 06:12 PM   #14 
  - I agree, it seems premature terminology to say that Rove was indicted  wishlist   May-13-06 06:18 PM   #20 
  - I agree with you. The thinkprogress report is really fuzzy  joemurphy   May-13-06 06:20 PM   #21 
     - Will Pitt just said in a different thread  riderinthestorm   May-13-06 06:25 PM   #24 
        - And then he posted a "sealed indictment" thread. Duh.  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 06:33 PM   #30 
           - Yup, I saw that.  riderinthestorm   May-13-06 06:39 PM   #33 
  - If the indictment has been handed down then it is Media Control...........  Minnesota Libra   May-13-06 06:13 PM   #15 
  - Did you see the Newsweek item posted by Burtworm?  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 06:18 PM   #19 
  - Read Jason Leopold's story  Jack Rabbit   May-13-06 06:24 PM   #23 
     - Jason Leopold also implies that Rove would be perp walked today  riderinthestorm   May-13-06 06:27 PM   #25 
     - Who knows what Leopold was implying. The article was so vague...  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 06:32 PM   #27 
     - I know what the article said.  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 06:30 PM   #26 
  - Has anybody contacted the MEDIA?  savemefromdumbya   May-14-06 05:19 PM   #42 
  - Poll ongoing now: will OBL win if W is deprived of a brain?  robbedvoter   May-13-06 06:14 PM   #16 
  - How long did it take to find out that the VP shot his buddy in the face?  madmunchie   May-13-06 06:15 PM   #17 
  - That happened on a ranch in Texas, not in the halls of D.C.  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 06:22 PM   #22 
     - Smells from here  madmunchie   May-14-06 05:15 PM   #41 
  - If it is true (and I believe it is), then Mr. Leopold has scooped them all  Jack Rabbit   May-13-06 06:17 PM   #18 
  - If an indictment had been filed even if it were sealed, we would've known  demobabe   May-13-06 06:32 PM   #28 
     - I think the point of a sealed indictment is that it is not a matter of  Garbo 2004   May-13-06 07:23 PM   #36 
        - I think everyone knows what a sealed indictment is.  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 07:33 PM   #37 
           - Except perhaps the poster I responded to who said a sealed indictment  Garbo 2004   May-13-06 07:47 PM   #39 
  - He has NOT been indicted, YET  debbierlus   May-13-06 06:33 PM   #29 
  - "Karl Rove Indicted on Charges of Perjury, Lying to Investigators"  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 06:35 PM   #32 
  - This is IMPOSSIBLE to cover up, Fitz will have a press conference  debbierlus   May-13-06 06:35 PM   #31 
  - KICK  Maddy McCall   May-13-06 07:06 PM   #34 
  - You mean like round-the-clock, round-the-dial coverage of Monicagate  Tactical Progressive   May-13-06 07:10 PM   #35 
  - A fine argument, as far as it goes  Bryan   May-13-06 07:46 PM   #38 
  - If the MSM had in fact been scooped on this, now that TO has released  Mayberry Machiavelli   May-13-06 07:55 PM   #40 
  - Anybody contacted the New York Times or the Washpost yet?  savemefromdumbya   May-14-06 05:20 PM   #43 
  - You mean the way they covered the false intelligence leading us to  deutsey   May-14-06 05:30 PM   #44 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC