445
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Colbert's speech at the WH dinner was TOTALLY inappropriate. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon May-01-06 04:26 PM
Original message
Colbert's speech at the WH dinner was TOTALLY inappropriate.
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Mon May-01-06 04:35 PM by Plaid Adder
And thank God for that.

This is probably not going to lead to Colbert getting a lot of outside-the-box speaking engagements, but so what. For 10 minutes he had the chance to say whatever he wanted to the people who have played a major role in turning 21st century America into the shithole it is, and he did something that the press have utterly and tragically failed to do. He refused to play nice just because he'd been invited into the club.

Stewart did the same thing when he was invited onto Crossfire before its demise. I'm sure that the guy who invited Colbert to the dinner was thinking the same thing Carlson and Begala were thinking when they invited Stewart to their soon-to-be-canceled show: now that he'd been invited into the club, they would all play along together, and everyone would have a good time. Stewart didn't, and neither did Colbert. It would have been easy enough for Colbert to spend the whole time attacking Bush--there's plenty of material, and he's at 32% and dropping--but he devoted a significant chunk of his appearance to going after the media as well. It's truly amazing watching the complete lack of amusement on all those well-made-up faces framed by perfectly-coiffed hair as Colbert insults them to their faces. The only person who comes out of it well is Helen Thomas, who stars in a video which closes the segment and which is probably the weakest part of the presentation--it probably needed a couple more edits before they showed it--except for the scenes with her stalking Colbert as he flees a press conference which thanks to her has gone horribly awry. The best moment comes in an underground garage, as an exhausted Colbert charges up to a police callbox and begs for help from this slow-moving octogenarian menace. "She won't stop asking me why we invaded Iraq!" he shouts. "Hey," says the voice on the other end. "Why did we invade Iraq?" "NOOOOOO!"

Like I said, there's some funny stuff in there, and he does get a few laughs--but only at jokes that involve things for which nobody in the room feels they have to take responsibility, like global warming, and Cheney's shooting of Whittington. Mainly the mood is one of shock and dismay--and not just because what Colbert is doing is 'inappropriate.' And I'll say this now: it absolutely was inappropriate. When someone invites a comic to a dinner, they often want him to roast one or more of the attendees; but they want him to do it gently, with love, in such a way that everyone will be reminded of why they really like the guy and how great he really is despite his minor flaws. Colbert must have known that was what they wanted from him, and he gave them ten minutes of squirming as he reminded them of all the ways in which they have failed to do their collective job. And in fact, the very fact that his act was inappropriate, impolite, ungrateful, and a violation of all the rules of etiquette was a major part of the critique. What is it they say--well-behaved women rarely make history? Well, a well-behaved press makes...this shit we're drowning in right now.

By doing that talk, Colbert modeled for them the refusal to compromise and the willingness to offend that they should have been demonstrating every day in that press room during the run-up to the Iraq war. It's not polite to call someone a liar to his face just because he's told you something that's patently not true. It's not appropriate social behavior to continue pushing your question in someone's face once he's said goodbye to you and moved on to someone else, just because he hasn't answered it. It's not grateful to repay the nice man who gave you your press pass and just called on you by asking him the questions you know he least wants to hear. It's not good manners to demand in no uncertain terms something that your host refuses to give you, even if it's the truth.

Between 2001 and 2004, the White House press corps, with a few exceptions, set a gold standard for polite behavior. They learned the appropriate rules and they observed them. And that's one of the reasons we started a war in Iraq over something that didn't exist: because they were afraid of being inappropriate. After 9/11, questioning Bush was just Not Done. It was like speaking ill of the dead, somehow: unless you were a fringe wacko on the web such as myself, you just didn't do it. It would bar you from the thresholds of all polite society. How could you be so mean to the brave man who's saving us from the terrorists? It was inappropriate. It was impolite. It was ungrateful. So it didn't happen--in the White House press room, or in the media outlets for which those reporters worked.

Helen Thomas was one of the few WH press reporters who understood something simple: that the Bush presidency was a crisis and a disaster. For that reason what had been accepted as "appropriate" behavior from the WH press pool had become grotesquely wrong, because it required the press to become complicit in telling the lies and maintaining the silences that made it possible for Bush and Cheney to pursue their insane domestic and foreign policies. She got that. We got it. But a lot of the other people in that room never got it. They went right on being polite, and strolled jovially alongside Ari and Scotty as we all traveled the path to perdition.

By standing up there and doing his act as he had written it, getting farther and farther into character as it became more and more clear that it was going over like a lead balloon, Colbert modeled for the press corps a form of courage that they have, by and large, miserably failed to demonstrate. He did his job the way he always does it without worrying about what the administration, his hosts, or his corporate sponsors were going to think of it. And he used those 10 minutes to tell the truth to people who certainly did not get themselves all dolled up for the purpose of sitting there and being forced to hear it. Having been offered the bone of insider status, Colbert, instead of scarfing it up and wagging his tail, bit the hand that fed him. It was uncomfortable, ungrateful, and ungracious; and it was exactly the kind of thing that the press should have started doing as soon as they realized what the crooks in the White House were feeding them.

So yeah. People are going to be all over the cable airwaves and whatnot calling Colbert's speech inappropriate. It absolutely was inappropriate. And it was also fucking right on. It is about time someone showed these people that there are more important things in the world than being invited back.

Thank you, Stephen Colbert,

The Plaid Adder

On edit: Yes, OK, I got the name of the Carlson/Begala show wrong, it's been fixed now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  Colbert's speech at the WH dinner was TOTALLY inappropriate. Plaid Adder  May-01-06 04:26 PM   #0 
   If only Hardball would go away-I think you meant Crossfire  AllieB   May-01-06 04:30 PM   #1 
   D'OH! Just edited that  Plaid Adder   May-01-06 04:34 PM   #4 
      Is your nick a tribute to the Black Adder?  Ex Lion Tamer   May-02-06 09:05 AM   #92 
         Yes, it is. n/t  Plaid Adder   May-02-06 09:21 AM   #93 
   The Begalia/Carlson show was called Crossfire, not Hardball  rocknation   May-01-06 04:31 PM   #2 
   Good writing. Had to read this because of the title.  caledesi   May-01-06 04:33 PM   #3 
   Amen, and thank you, Plaid Adder!  highplainsdem   May-01-06 04:35 PM   #5 
   Please thank Mr. Colbert, too (LINK)  psychopomp   May-01-06 11:07 PM   #73 
      And thank YOU for that link!  Maeve   May-02-06 07:49 AM   #86 
   Well put, as always.  Rosemary2205   May-01-06 04:35 PM   #6 
   I don't think Judith Miller cared if what she wrote was appropriate...  cryingshame   May-01-06 04:38 PM   #7 
   Absolutely correct...she's a NeoCon fellow traveler.  Media_Lies_Daily   May-01-06 05:12 PM   #23 
   Yep, the press has as much Iraqi blood on thier hands as does  stop the bleeding   May-01-06 04:40 PM   #8 
   Hands down, the best analysis of Colbert's performance  Jacobin   May-01-06 04:41 PM   #9 
   The Lapdog of the Government  Hardrada   May-01-06 08:53 PM   #51 
   I hope his inappropriateness sticks in their collective craws  Mandate My Ass   May-01-06 04:42 PM   #10 
   Time to take off the white gloves, and KEEP them off.  Kurovski   May-01-06 04:44 PM   #11 
   It would have been more appropriate if at the end...  warrens   May-01-06 04:46 PM   #12 
   Crossfire was cancelled BECAUSE OF Jon Stewart  underpants   May-01-06 04:47 PM   #13 
   Just a reminder: this same press corps  Admiral Loinpresser   May-01-06 04:47 PM   #14 
   There are a lot of us Colberts out here that are set in our convictions.  MazeRat7   May-01-06 04:48 PM   #15 
   "Stewart didn't, and neither did Colbert" (play along).  DemoTex   May-01-06 04:52 PM   #16 
   The court jester is actually an old and honorable tradition.  Raksha   May-01-06 11:07 PM   #72 
      Nice King Lear reference!  Ned_Devine   May-01-06 11:23 PM   #74 
         Well, it's been so long since I read it  Raksha   May-02-06 12:30 AM   #80 
   Hard to smile when someone slings shit right back at ya.  Rex   May-01-06 04:54 PM   #17 
   If I were Prez, I wouldn't show up to this thing.  MookieWilson   May-01-06 04:57 PM   #18 
   Excellent Post!!  politrix   May-01-06 05:01 PM   #20 
   How "free" are we if we can't be critical of His Chimpness, face-to-face?  Media_Lies_Daily   May-01-06 05:46 PM   #26 
      A Question Period, like Parliament would be even better.  MookieWilson   May-01-06 06:55 PM   #32 
   Last week I was riding my bike past Colbert's studio  soleft   May-01-06 05:00 PM   #19 
   I thought it was quite telling, that the other performer Bush invited  Lisa   May-01-06 05:09 PM   #21 
   Wonderful post, Lisa! ....n/t  WiseButAngrySara   May-01-06 08:13 PM   #43 
   Interesting that the media ignored MLK's "I have a dream" speech  Francine Frensky   May-01-06 05:09 PM   #22 
   Lincoln's address at Gettysburg  Bear down under   May-02-06 05:01 AM   #85 
   You had be at Colbert. . .  MsUnderstood   May-01-06 05:16 PM   #24 
   He simply fought fire with fire.  Hubert Flottz   May-01-06 05:33 PM   #25 
   Some criticize the clip with Helen  Karenina   May-01-06 05:51 PM   #27 
   I thought so, too. I thought the whole Colbert performance was  Alamom   May-01-06 06:51 PM   #31 
   And a good time was had by all...  Hubert Flottz   May-01-06 08:32 PM   #45 
   Plus the "Gannon" button made the whole thing worth it  Patiod   May-02-06 08:49 AM   #89 
   Loved that part  PegDAC   May-01-06 08:43 PM   #46 
      I loved it too.  Hubert Flottz   May-01-06 08:53 PM   #50 
   I love the way he described Washington  dogdayDU Moderator   May-01-06 05:51 PM   #28 
   A malomar!  Kurovski   May-01-06 06:42 PM   #30 
   Inappropriately appropriate or appropriately inappropriate.  King Coal   May-01-06 05:55 PM   #29 
   No the speech was NOT funny  TexasLawyer   May-01-06 07:02 PM   #33 
   Cannot add anything that has not been said, but will kick & recommend..  BrklynLiberal   May-01-06 07:44 PM   #36 
   Bush ate crow at the dinner.  fearthem   May-01-06 07:15 PM   #34 
   Peppered with buckshot  canichelouis   May-01-06 11:06 PM   #71 
   great post, nice seeing you around... n/t  petersondDU Moderator   May-01-06 07:44 PM   #35 
   excellent and journalists have forgotten to be the eyes and ears of  NVMojo   May-01-06 07:46 PM   #37 
   Jeff Gannon mouth piece  Blutodog   May-01-06 08:01 PM   #39 
   "mouth piece" EVERY pun intended!  Raster   May-01-06 08:07 PM   #42 
   Is this DU anymore, or Entertainment tonight?  Clarkie1   May-01-06 08:00 PM   #38 
   ? I think that was the point of the article.  donco6   May-01-06 08:05 PM   #40 
   Uh, reading past the title might help....  Notoverit   May-01-06 08:47 PM   #47 
   my only concern was after the speech sc would never get rw'rs on  madmark   May-01-06 08:05 PM   #41 
   Excellent analysis Plaid Adder!! K & R! ....n/t  WiseButAngrySara   May-01-06 08:22 PM   #44 
   Ka-Ching! Fan-Fucking-Tastic!  Tom Yossarian Joad   May-01-06 08:48 PM   #48 
   BRAVO!  Terran1212   May-01-06 08:49 PM   #49 
   And you know what cheeses me off to no end?  Generator   May-01-06 08:56 PM   #52 
   I keep hearing from my Righty friends  Epiphany4z   May-01-06 08:57 PM   #53 
   excellent essay Plaid Adder  marions ghost   May-01-06 08:57 PM   #54 
   Here ! Here!  ShortnFiery   May-01-06 08:58 PM   #55 
   More People Need to Be "Inappropriate"  tlsmith1963   May-01-06 09:07 PM   #56 
   The dinner promotes an unhealthy coziness between WH and press.  MookieWilson   May-01-06 09:21 PM   #57 
   Brilliant, just brilliant.  MrSlayer   May-01-06 09:29 PM   #58 
   Very good analysis. Nominated. n/t  0007   May-01-06 09:51 PM   #59 
   Notice how no one critical of his act  Horseradish   May-01-06 09:54 PM   #60 
   ...  CrispyQGirl   May-02-06 12:08 AM   #79 
   Precisely, Plaid Adder.  aquart   May-01-06 09:54 PM   #61 
   Great Post, Plaid Adder  tomg   May-01-06 09:56 PM   #62 
   Thanks for the perspective!  Zen   May-01-06 10:20 PM   #63 
   That was Nicholas Cage in "Moonstruck" n/t  kdpeters   May-01-06 10:45 PM   #65 
   Suck Ups in the Washington Press Corps...  12 12 2000   May-01-06 10:41 PM   #64 
   How Can It Be Inappropriate When It Was So Long Overdue?  DallasNE   May-01-06 10:55 PM   #66 
   They tried to delegitimize him by bringing him into the mainstream.  JWS   May-01-06 11:00 PM   #67 
   Colbert nom'd for a spot on Mt Rushmore  opihimoimoi   May-01-06 11:01 PM   #68 
   Mt Colbert  Mr_Spock   May-02-06 01:52 PM   #96 
   Ye who dares wins  savemefromdumbya   May-01-06 11:02 PM   #69 
   A coward dies a thousand deaths.  Frank Cannon   May-01-06 11:43 PM   #76 
   Colbert is totally hardcore -- like a superhero.  SmokingJacket   May-01-06 11:03 PM   #70 
   Hardsnot deserves to die a quick death on MSM!  lonestarnot   May-01-06 11:34 PM   #75 
   Great Post PA..  Tellurian   May-01-06 11:51 PM   #77 
   No longer feeling so "chipper"  Herman47   May-02-06 12:03 AM   #78 
   LOL  themartyred   May-02-06 01:08 AM   #81 
   They had been basking in self-admiration until Colbert came on.  suffragette   May-02-06 01:24 AM   #82 
   - 'Zactly Right!  Nostradammit   May-02-06 02:31 AM   #83 
   Thank you Plaid Adder!  Stockholm   May-02-06 02:54 AM   #84 
   Great read, Adder.  sutz12   May-02-06 07:50 AM   #87 
   Stewart, Colbert: Comedians with teeth  crispini   May-02-06 08:34 AM   #88 
   I agree, SC was just excellent. As is your post. K&R.  Rhiannon12866   May-02-06 08:54 AM   #90 
   We need more comedians like Colbert & Stewart  DemGirl7   May-02-06 09:03 AM   #91 
   well said. but the corporate media has put a tight lid on Colbert story,  oc2002   May-02-06 12:47 PM   #94 
   Amen  MetaTrope   May-02-06 12:59 PM   #95 
   Memo sez: "Crossed the line". You don't use the correct term: busted!  robbedvoter   May-02-06 02:06 PM   #97 
   Best read of the day!  quantessd   May-02-06 04:16 PM   #98 
   Adler- someone please where can we get transcripts to Colberts  cyclezealot   May-03-06 04:36 AM   #99 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC