Reply #51: I understand what you're saying...

[demobabe]

Do you think Luskin would chance lying publicly about Patrick Fitzgerald? That could be one of the worst things he could do for his client. Judges don't like you putting words in their mouth (and I've witnessed that first hand to a really awful outcome).

BTW, Rove "volunteered" not to beg, but because he would have been subpeonaed otherwise. The "volunteered" part is spin coming from his lawyer to make it look like he's cooperating and isn't in trouble. He WILL be indicted, make no mistake.

I'll make you a deal: I'll publicly apologize to Jason Leopold if he's able to prove that Karl Rove (or his attorney) received a target letter as of or before April 26, 2006.

How about you? If I'm right, will you post you were wrong about Leopold?

on edit: I was previously under the assumption that target letters would not be issued prior to testifying before the Grand Jury. I was wrong about that and TalkLeft explains it well:

http://www.talkleft.com/new_archives/012634.html