Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Reply #12: More hypocrisy. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is locked.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Mar-14-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. More hypocrisy.
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Sat Mar-14-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. There are certainly more voices here
that aren't allowed to speak, in this Group or elsewhere, who are interested in more wide ranging discussion, rather than bashing a group seen as fair game. Just the fact that numerous posts, including by that poster, accusing me of "being a troll" and "disruptor" were allowed to stand is problematic.

I apologized in the OP b/c I thought "science" meant science and that those voices or lurkers might resist the groupthink. Some did. Even one of those outways dozens of the willfully belligerent.

I'm interested in what people have to say that appears during group attacks as hollow and unjustified. These are smart people. There's got to be SOMETHING behind rather than personal pain and business agendas.



"Just the fact that numerous posts, including by that poster, accusing me of "being a troll" and "disruptor" were allowed to stand is problematic."

As problematic as these from your group?:

it's time to focus on what we want to see/be and not waste time fighting toxic blowhards


"Hey, what's your opinion on why the naysayers keep bringing up the indigo thing?"

They're "douchebags" and when they read this, they'll understand.


What I don't understand is some of the same people looking for/demanding support for their pet issues in GD and sub-forums, issues that marginalize them, are so intolerant, abusive and emotionally retarded in mob attacking others (including those with shared interests).


They are emotionally stunted and it doesn't matter the topic, as long as they can gather like a pack of jackals, tear it apart and GET AWAY WITH IT ON DU.


similar to
blind belief in "science" and the "rational" causing closed minds and hostile reactions to anything that pushes the envelope of the Already Known.

As different from true science as religion is from spirituality, as zealotry is from rationale.


mob swarms that organize somewhere on DU, including Groups and subforums


The Lounge is very middle school-like
Cliques and flirtations and popularity contests, "cool kids" and hangers on...and when someone says the wrong thing, they are attacked so the cool kids and wannabes can maintain their "ranking". Or something. I just used to find the Lounge amusing and didn't participate in the dramas. As I posted upthread, though, now I'm looking at the Loungers in a different light, with far less trust. They're no longer harmless to me; they have a dark underbelly.

GOOD POINT about the viciousness of the gay crowd. I noticed that too! It's like for once they're not the victim of the bigotry, and they're going to enjoy it and encourage it and keep it going for as long as possible. I expected them to be more tolerant because of their own experiences being on the receiving end of negativity.

Some intolerant bullies who may or may not be whatever subgroup but the bottom line is
they get away with what they do.

Why? How?

The answer appears to be -- after the most recent DUbacle -- is they serve the purpose of marginalizing others and being too busy being petty to promote their issues in the Big Forums.

They unwittingly serve to perpetuate and protect the dominant paradigm that is marginalizing them. It's win win!!



The scary part is the selfrighteousness about it, while ATTACKING SOME MORE

Poor things.

The mere prescence of a thread on a topic deemed "woo" by the self appointed arbiters of What DUers May Discuss OR NOT!!!1111!! is irrational, self righteous, info free, one liner attacks; delivered with the attitude of "what did you expect, you deserve to be attacked." preventing anything resembling discussion and shutting down and/or locking threads other DUers are interested in. This rabid zealotry appears as knee jerk and ignorant as any of the religious fundamentalists the science fundamentalists criticize.

Perhaps there are too many here who didn't grow up with or have access to the wealth of science fiction that inspired -- and continues to -- exploration of ideas and imagination, including science and futuristic technology, that peaked in the 70's/80's and went off a cliff with the rest of our culture after. It still exists, but the media masters like to regurgitate old ideas and not so much with the support of new voices/artists/writers that don't have Sure Thing written all over.

Even the comment that "so it's only a miracle if we'd predicted that this particular organism was going to be the result" seems like short-sighted and truncated thought. It's this limited scope of the possible, the willingness to shut down imagination and vision, including the inevitable merging of old ideas with new; and previous concepts thought separate seen with new awareness of interconnections.



Your cries of persecution ring hollow and your hypocrisy is infinite.

Unlike the posters in the astrology group, we didn't call you names or accuse you of anything until you showed up here to disrupt ours.

Your group constantly attacks other members and then hides behind the "rules" if anyone tries to defend themselves.

Just a few hours ago, you called me out in your group:

This is the most vicious, hateful, inflammatory and intensionally damaging act I have ever see on DU.


At least I have the courage to confront you to your face.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  I'm sorry, I thought the title said "Science" omega minimo  Mar-14-09 04:35 AM   #0 
   In before lock? nt.  uriel1972   Mar-14-09 04:38 AM   #1 
   no worries, mate  omega minimo   Mar-14-09 04:41 AM   #2 
   Why would an astrologer like you suddenly care about science?  cosmik debris   Mar-14-09 08:02 AM   #3 
   Why would you care who posts here?  CanSocDem   Mar-14-09 10:05 AM   #4 
   This is a group for skeptics not faith healers and astrologers  cosmik debris   Mar-14-09 10:13 AM   #5 
   You're not getting this.....  CanSocDem   Mar-14-09 10:53 AM   #6 
   "pervert worthwhile discussions"  omega minimo   Mar-14-09 03:04 PM   #7 
      I thought you said posting quotes from groups was a violation of the rules?  beam me up scottie   Mar-14-09 03:36 PM   #11 
   Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-14-09 03:23 PM   #9 
      More hypocrisy.  beam me up scottie   Mar-14-09 04:05 PM   #12 
         Hatefulness to post AGAIN in ANOTHER thread, A POST THAT IS NOT MINE & HARMS DU  omega minimo   Mar-14-09 04:22 PM   #14 
         So you assert that none of those posts are yours?  beam me up scottie   Mar-14-09 04:45 PM   #17 
            you know exactly what you've done  omega minimo   Mar-14-09 05:35 PM   #20 
         Hatefulness and bullying are the opposite of courage  omega minimo   Mar-14-09 04:30 PM   #15 
            Yeah, yeah, poor victimized omega minimo, my heart bleeds.  beam me up scottie   Mar-14-09 05:04 PM   #18 
               the objection is to what you are perpetrating on DU as in AGAINST DU, not me.  omega minimo   Mar-14-09 05:34 PM   #19 
   .  omega minimo   Mar-14-09 03:06 PM   #8 
      Hypocrite.  beam me up scottie   Mar-14-09 03:32 PM   #10 
         How do you get away with it?  omega minimo   Mar-14-09 04:18 PM   #13 
            Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-14-09 04:37 PM   #16 
   Locking  awoke_in_2003   Mar-14-09 05:40 PM   #21 
 

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC