Reply #89: Like you spend yours- trolling for attention in groups where you're not welcome? No thanks. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

First thread | Last thread

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group

beam me up scottie

(1000+ posts)

Mon Mar-16-09 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #87

89. Like you spend yours- trolling for attention in groups where you're not welcome? No thanks.

Edited on Mon Mar-16-09 02:37 AM by beam me up scottie

I prefer to research cults and snake oil salesmen and post the information in the appropriate group.

Your intent is obviously to disrupt since you've attacked everyone who disagreed with you, and refused to read the references provided by the skeptics in this group (which you DEMANDED repeatedly).

This isn't WooWooLand, in this group you're expected to back up your claims with evidence.

You should go back to your echo chamber, you know absolutely nothing about the subject in the op and it's painfully obvious that you're way out of your league.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

How is the idea of a group of people being "more evolved"	TZ	Mar-13-09 08:36 AM	#0
It certainly makes me wonder.	cosmik debris	Mar-13-09 08:59 AM	#1
We "normals" wouldn't have to die off...	Silent3	Mar-13-09 09:09 AM	#2
You're right of course.	cosmik debris	Mar-13-09 09:23 AM	#4
Just as bad as the supposed speed of this evolution...	Silent3	Mar-13-09 09:33 AM	#5
You gave me a great idea for some new woo.	cosmik debris	Mar-13-09 09:48 AM	#6
?	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 06:22 PM	#15
Wrong.	HiFructosePronSyrup	Mar-13-09 06:24 PM	#16
Well you live in your pinball universe and I'll live in the one we share	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 06:30 PM	#19
Teleology is a delusion based on imposing human social reality onto the physical world.	Odin2005	Mar-13-09 07:04 PM	#24
teleology	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 07:38 PM	#25
Wrong, you said:	Odin2005	Mar-13-09 07:52 PM	#28
sorry, that was a quote of someone else.	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 08:08 PM	#29
DOH! My bad! n/t.	Odin2005	Mar-13-09 09:18 PM	#30
I'm confused about both what it is that you're referring to...	Silent3	Mar-13-09 09:21 PM	#31
I thought Deep 13's post had a lot of good points	omega minimo	Mar-14-09 12:00 AM	#35
A bicycle is not a horse and a teacup isn't your grandmother.	Silent3	Mar-14-09 01:12 AM	#39
I am not your generic boogeyman. Your post is not a direct response, it's scattershot	omega minimo	Mar-14-09 04:22 AM	#40
A generic response is the that best vague handwaving and generic disagreeableness deserves...	Silent3	Mar-14-09 09:37 AM	#42
My message was that you could have responded directly to what I wrote, rather than scattershot	omega minimo	Mar-14-09 02:44 PM	#43
When no one seems to understand what you're getting at...	Silent3	Mar-14-09 03:24 PM	#48
The reply began by praising Deep 13's post!!!!!	omega minimo	Mar-14-09 03:53 PM	#49
You got a love letter too?	beam me up scottie	Mar-14-09 03:05 PM	#46
rather a witness of your intent to harm	omega minimo	Mar-14-09 04:04 PM	#50
You're the one sending hissy fits in the form of a pm. Am I supposed to be intimidated?	beam me up scottie	Mar-14-09 06:11 PM	#52
Intimidated? No. Rational? One would have hoped.	omega minimo	Mar-14-09 06:22 PM	#53
Your posts in this group are some of the most irrational I've ever seen.	beam me up scottie	Mar-14-09 06:49 PM	#56
DU is welcome to read my posts w/o your misrepresentations and violations	omega minimo	Mar-14-09 06:52 PM	#57
Oh, trust me, they are. Why, you have as many fans in this group as you do everywhere else.	beam me up scottie	Mar-14-09 07:03 PM	#59
but if your ideas weren't misrepresented, they wouldn't have any meaning at all	CreekDog	Mar-27-09 06:13 PM	#107
OMG...that thread was a train wreck...	SidDithers	Mar-31-09 02:46 PM	#130
One or two little details...	LooseWilly	Mar-15-09 09:31 PM	#72
More detail please	omega minimo	Mar-15-09 11:56 PM	#78
assumption:You are a fossil.	jeff30997	Jul-21-09 09:47 AM	#133
speaking of detectors........	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 06:19 PM	#13
Because the claim made...	HiFructosePronSyrup	Mar-13-09 06:27 PM	#18
AFAIK	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 06:31 PM	#20
How does it not imply some instantaneous process?	HiFructosePronSyrup	Mar-13-09 06:33 PM	#22
AFAIK	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 07:39 PM	#26
I'm with High Fructose...	LooseWilly	Mar-15-09 09:49 PM	#73
It is not an assumption	cosmik debris	Mar-14-09 12:08 AM	#37
We all exist at the same point in time, therefore, ...	Deep13	Mar-13-09 09:16 AM	#3
Interesting.	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 06:26 PM	#17
This OP is a dangerous example of propaganda based on complete misinterpretation & misrepresentation	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 05:13 PM	#7
You are in the wrong place.	cosmik debris	Mar-13-09 05:29 PM	#8
Actually, I think that's a fine question.	HiFructosePronSyrup	Mar-13-09 05:52 PM	#10
If there is any such attitude, it would be good to know that	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 06:10 PM	#12
They're not inflammatory, they're just assumptions.	HiFructosePronSyrup	Mar-13-09 06:19 PM	#14
You know that's not true	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 06:33 PM	#21
If a person gets offended does that mean something is inflammatory?	HiFructosePronSyrup	Mar-13-09 06:34 PM	#23
If a person/group use it to be inflammatory intentionally, does that mean something is inflammatory?	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 07:42 PM	#27
Intentionally inflammatory? You mean like these comments?:	beam me up scottie	Mar-13-09 10:26 PM	#32
You are posting	omega minimo	Mar-13-09 11:31 PM	#33
Right. You can't wait to go running back to your little pals and brag about how you set us straight.	beam me up scottie	Mar-13-09 11:49 PM	#34
If I went "running back" it would be to "brag" that I gave up......	omega minimo	Mar-14-09 12:04 AM	#36
Deleted sub-thread	Name removed	Mar-14-09 12:14 AM	#38
Wait, what "it"? n/t	LooseWilly	Mar-15-09 10:41 PM	#75
I can't locate the poster who commented on very personal objections to any such "superiority"	omega minimo	Mar-16-09 12:50 AM	#81
Really	TZ	Mar-14-09 06:41 PM	#54
Deleted sub-thread	Name removed	Mar-13-09 06:03 PM	#11
Actually, the OP doesn't claim anyone has any attitudes.	LooseWilly	Mar-15-09 10:05 PM	#74
I'd say it's less in that it hasn't got a malicious, racist intent.	HiFructosePronSyrup	Mar-13-09 05:51 PM	#9
I agree...	LeftishBrit	Mar-14-09 02:55 PM	#44
I don't think its got it YET...	TZ	Mar-14-09 07:20 PM	#62
Any parent who claims their indigo child isn't superior is either lying or grossly ignorant.	beam me up scottie	Mar-14-09 05:14 AM	#41
Interesting thread...	LeftishBrit	Mar-14-09 02:56 PM	#45
You're just a hater.	beam me up scottie	Mar-14-09 03:19 PM	#47
Hey, mine too!	mr blur	Mar-14-09 05:38 PM	#51
This thread proves my hyppthesis	TZ	Mar-14-09 06:49 PM	#55
HERE I AM TO SAVE THE DAY!	beam me up scottie	Mar-14-09 06:58 PM	#58
Somebody used the word jihad	TZ	Mar-14-09 07:05 PM	#60
One would think it would be brave for one to come in here picking fights.	beam me up scottie	Mar-14-09 07:20 PM	#63
You can't have a rational discussion with someone who refuses to adopt a rationalist attitude.	Odin2005	Mar-29-09 12:17 PM	#124
Deleted sub-thread	Name removed	Mar-14-09 07:19 PM	#61
Two things about the idea of some people being 'more evolved' bother me.	Random_Australian	Mar-14-09 11:14 PM	#64
Yes, we attempted discussing that earlier in thread	omega minimo	Mar-15-09 01:45 AM	#66
I'm for attemping again. You seem to respond to potshots versus the indigos, so I'll start there.	Random_Australian	Mar-15-09 06:44 AM	#67
Bravo	TZ	Mar-15-09 07:57 AM	#68
I'm sorry	omega minimo	Mar-15-09 02:01 PM	#69
You finally get a chance for a serious discussion, and you say "I won't now"	uppityperson	Mar-23-09 05:12 AM	#104
Indigo/crystal woofers believe they're superior/more evolved because they read it on teh internets.	beam me up scottie	Mar-15-09 01:16 AM	#65
It isn't -- it's 100% the basis of Eugenics (Good OP!)	LostinVA	Mar-15-09 08:16 PM	#70
We all evolve	omega minimo	Mar-15-09 10:58 PM	#76
Hahahaha	TZ	Mar-15-09 11:46 PM	#77
and after all that	omega minimo	Mar-16-09 12:00 AM	#79
My point is your total little exposition on us all "evolving"	TZ	Mar-16-09 08:53 AM	#95
Sorry, never have	omega minimo	Mar-16-09 12:32 PM	#98
PSST...	TZ	Mar-16-09 12:59 PM	#99
But Kryon says we CAN CHANGE OUR OWN DNA!	beam me up scottie	Mar-16-09 12:33 AM	#80
What. The. Fuck.	AZCat	Mar-16-09 12:54 AM	#82
And stolen from Umberto Eco, I'd venture to say	Orrex	Mar-16-09 01:02 AM	#83
I read some whacked-out science fiction back in the day...	AZCat	Mar-16-09 01:09 AM	#84
Bizarre. Ignorant. And a gold mine. That's just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.	beam me up scottie	Mar-16-09 01:28 AM	#85
Shilling for disembodied entities must be pretty lucrative...	AZCat	Mar-16-09 01:40 AM	#86
Check it out, it's a freakin' empire.	beam me up scottie	Mar-16-09 02:16 AM	#88
If you didn't have the scapegoat, you'd have more time to spend constructively	omega minimo	Mar-16-09 02:05 AM	#87
Like you spend yours- trolling for attention in groups where you're not welcome? No thanks.	beam me up scottie	Mar-16-09 02:32 AM	#89
OIC	omega minimo	Mar-16-09 02:35 AM	#90
I have rarely encounter such stupidity as yours. You're really pissing me off.	mr blur	Mar-16-09 08:23 AM	#94
'The perpetuation of the "superior" attitude that no one on DU AFAIK has stated' - you did yourself	muriel_volestrangler	Mar-16-09 09:05 AM	#96
First, individual organisms do not evolve.	trotsky	Mar-16-09 09:14 AM	#97
A standard tactic of woo-thinking is to co-opt scientific terminology	Orrex	Mar-16-09 02:52 PM	#100
Jargon is meant to be confusing and impart a feeling of awe and impressiveness	uppityperson	Mar-23-09 05:16 AM	#105
Don't forget the woos hijacking quantum mechanics without understanding of QM.	Odin2005	Mar-29-09 12:23 PM	#125
#7 and #10...	SidDithers	Mar-31-09 03:39 PM	#131
OK, settle down children! no need to keep flaming each other.	Odin2005	Mar-15-09 08:46 PM	#71
"there is a gap between the brain and the skull. Obviously an evolutionary step"	beam me up scottie	Mar-16-09 03:40 AM	#91
What absolute bullshit! (nt)	mr blur	Mar-16-09 05:54 AM	#92
That's pretty sad	moggie	Mar-28-09 07:24 PM	#112
True.	beam me up scottie	Mar-28-09 09:21 PM	#114
Yeah but if we don't become Indigo we'll never be invited to join The Federation	mr blur	Mar-16-09 05:58 AM	#93
I should read threads in total before posting	Djinn	Mar-22-09 12:20 AM	#101
It's like she wants woo to be recognized as a religion so that no one can criticize them.	beam me up scottie	Mar-23-09 12:03 AM	#102
even if it were it definitely wouldn't stop me criticising them	Djinn	Mar-23-09 03:40 AM	#103
Exactly, no religious beliefs are off limits on DU, just ask scientologists.	beam me up scottie	Mar-23-09 08:52 AM	#106
When there are no facts to support a position then they resort to the personal level	bluedawg12	Mar-28-09 11:13 AM	#108
The 'religion' of science....	CanSocDem	Mar-28-09 02:02 PM	#109
I love it when people refer to the 'religion of science'	Orrex	Mar-28-09 03:51 PM	#110
I'm surprised Nurse Ratchet lets him access teh internets.	beam me up scottie	Mar-28-09 08:04 PM	#113
Or he has to sleep off the headache resulting from the pillow-induced snooze	Orrex	Mar-28-09 09:23 PM	#115
I hate it when people don't understand...	CanSocDem	Mar-29-09 10:52 AM	#119
And I hate fundies	TZ	Mar-29-09 11:03 AM	#120
With me it's ...	CanSocDem	Mar-29-09 11:22 AM	#122
"people who don't see irony even when it is slappin' them in the head"	cosmik debris	Mar-29-09 11:34 AM	#123
Nope YOU ARE THE SELF ADMITTED BIGOT	TZ	Mar-29-09 04:23 PM	#128
You keep making the same mistake	Orrex	Mar-29-09 12:42 PM	#126
As do you.	CanSocDem	Mar-29-09 03:12 PM	#127
You just get wackier and wackier.	Orrex	Mar-29-09 05:02 PM	#129
Ignore	WoodrowFan	Jul-21-09 11:57 AM	#134
Weird beliefs and fanatical followers	TZ	Mar-28-09 07:12 PM	#111
Let's pretend you are capable of learning the difference between woo and science.	beam me up scottie	Mar-28-09 10:18 PM	#116
OK, what do you think?	salvorhardin	Mar-28-09 10:26 PM	#117
Cage match?	beam me up scottie	Mar-29-09 12:23 AM	#118
And she has the Pink Beehive Shag Mullet of DEATHHHHHH	Heddi	Mar-29-09 11:12 AM	#121
Hey gang. Please don't give the hateful bigot a stage.	salvorhardin	Mar-31-09 06:05 PM	#132

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.