musette_sf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-26-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
| -Should there be an upper bound on some components of child support payments? |
Boojatta |
Feb-05-08 08:10 PM |
#0 |
 -
Don't many states consider awarding amounts to maintain the lifestyle the kids knew? |
havocmom |
Feb-05-08 08:14 PM |
#1 |
| -
As a single mom I spent at least 17 per cent on my child. |
truedelphi |
Feb-05-08 08:17 PM |
#2 |
  -
Actually, the amount in the table is 29% for three children. |
Boojatta |
Feb-05-08 08:28 PM |
#4 |
| -
Well you only confirm what my son used to say! |
truedelphi |
Feb-06-08 01:16 PM |
#25 |
| -
There seems to be an element of "penalty" for the non-custodial |
wtmusic |
Feb-05-08 08:17 PM |
#3 |
| -
In California, the amount of time a parent spends with the child |
JDPriestly |
Feb-05-08 08:37 PM |
#5 |
| -
Depends on what the meaning of "needs" is. What does a "roof over one's head" constitute?... |
Hekate |
Feb-05-08 09:15 PM |
#6 |
| -
"what it takes to support the household his children live in" |
Boojatta |
Feb-05-08 09:32 PM |
#7 |
| -
I agree with your posts except for |
truedelphi |
Feb-06-08 01:19 PM |
#27 |
| -
Well, yes, take the case of Kevin Federline and Britney Spears. Egads what a disaster. nt |
Hekate |
Feb-07-08 01:16 AM |
#30 |
| -
Kevin was not exactly the person who came to mind - |
truedelphi |
Feb-07-08 11:48 AM |
#36 |
| -
Most places child support is based on a percentage of non-custodial parent's income |
uppityperson |
Feb-05-08 09:34 PM |
#8 |
| -
'It is not based on "need" but on what would be.' |
Boojatta |
Feb-05-08 09:38 PM |
#9 |
| -
Nope. |
uppityperson |
Feb-05-08 09:41 PM |
#10 |
| -
Suppose that the percentage of gross income approach |
Boojatta |
Feb-05-08 09:48 PM |
#11 |
| -
You sure concluded a lot from "nope" |
uppityperson |
Feb-05-08 09:50 PM |
#12 |
| -
I concluded a lot? I described a hypothetical scenario and asked a question. |
Boojatta |
Feb-05-08 09:53 PM |
#13 |
| -
push poll |
uppityperson |
Feb-05-08 09:56 PM |
#14 |
| -
yet another thread |
lwfern |
Feb-06-08 05:41 AM |
#15 |
| -
Do you actually oppose an upper bound or merely fail to get excited about an upper bound? |
Boojatta |
Feb-06-08 09:52 AM |
#16 |
| -
Maybe you can post your OP on a men's rights forum |
lwfern |
Feb-06-08 10:32 AM |
#17 |
| -
Can we start alerting on these types of posts? |
plantwomyn |
Feb-06-08 10:48 AM |
#20 |
| -
I might be wrong, but I think that one person working alone can alert on a post or thread. |
Boojatta |
Feb-06-08 12:13 PM |
#21 |
| -
If taxes to pay for the costs of providing compulsory education |
Boojatta |
Feb-06-08 12:40 PM |
#23 |
| -
Yes, I quite get that you are interpreting "women's rights" |
lwfern |
Feb-06-08 01:19 PM |
#26 |
| -
"Changing a law to benefit primarily rich white men" |
Boojatta |
Feb-06-08 01:43 PM |
#28 |
| -
Apparently there was a misunderstanding here. |
lwfern |
Feb-06-08 03:10 PM |
#29 |
| -
"How can we ensure children and single parents living in poverty have their basic needs met?" |
Boojatta |
Feb-07-08 09:26 AM |
#31 |
| -
Excellent. |
lwfern |
Feb-07-08 09:43 AM |
#32 |
| -
Is your "excellent" comment based on reading that new thread |
Boojatta |
Feb-07-08 09:57 AM |
#33 |
| -
It was sarcasm |
lwfern |
Feb-07-08 10:53 AM |
#35 |
| -
"you see the problems of the poor as belonging elsewhere" |
Boojatta |
Feb-08-08 05:50 PM |
#39 |
| -
What I meant |
lwfern |
Feb-08-08 06:21 PM |
#40 |
| -
Okay, Ill bite. |
plantwomyn |
Feb-06-08 10:43 AM |
#18 |
| -
"Finally, I don't think you know the definition of 'arbitrary'." |
Boojatta |
Feb-06-08 12:23 PM |
#22 |
| -
The word you should be using is wide-ranging. |
plantwomyn |
Feb-07-08 01:54 PM |
#38 |
| -
no there shouldnt be. |
lionesspriyanka |
Feb-06-08 10:43 AM |
#19 |
| -
Would you have preferred a poll? Would you be willing to share some thoughts... |
Boojatta |
Feb-06-08 12:59 PM |
#24 |
| -
i dont see a good argument why their should be a upper bound? |
lionesspriyanka |
Feb-07-08 11:53 AM |
#37 |
| -
No fixed upper bound. |
electron_blue |
Feb-07-08 10:32 AM |
#34 |
| -
If we want to chip away at the class system, where should we begin? |
Boojatta |
Feb-25-08 11:51 AM |
#41 |
| -
Unions, unions, unions!!! |
Karl_Bonner_1982 |
Aug-11-08 04:08 PM |
#48 |
| -
Billionaires shouldn't be able to get out from under for $3000/month |
Warpy |
Feb-25-08 04:43 PM |
#42 |
| -
Hey, Boo, would you check in here? |
raccoon |
Feb-26-08 08:54 AM |
#43 |
| -
he doesn't need to |
musette_sf |
Feb-26-08 11:34 AM |
#44 |
| -
Kick |
Boojatta |
Jul-28-08 10:27 AM |
#45 |
| -
Why? |
thecatburgler |
Aug-08-08 07:40 PM |
#46 |
| -
Have you ever raised a child alone, Boojatta? |
PeaceNikki |
Aug-11-08 12:52 AM |
#47 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread