You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: So we are in agreement then? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
cleanhippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #34
47. So we are in agreement then?
They should be doing research to reduce the number of Hannah Poling's as much as possible.


I agree. However, the number of Hannah Polings is minuscule, in the less than 1% category. These tests are expensive and time consuming, therefore not feasible until a quick, cheap test can be developed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC