You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: This portion of the article is quite misleading [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. This portion of the article is quite misleading
I can relate to the potential poison part of their belief. A dear friends son, with much the same diagnosis as Daniel, passed away several years ago, not from the cancer, but because of the chemotherapy. And, yes, the doctors admitted as much.
Oncologists, who most all of the time refuse to use the word cure, preferring the less litigious term, remission, say Daniel would have a 95 percent chance of survival with chemo treatment. Without their treatment, statistics are hazy and have been reported at from 5 percent to 25 percent chance of survival, but not zero.


the author does not name the cancer from which his friends child suffered from what is said I would imagine lymphoma is in the name, as there are over 30 different types of lymphoma one can not know exactly which he is talking, he says the child died from the chemo and yes that does happen, the most frequent cause is a allergic reaction to the drugs, patients and their guardians are quite fully informed as to this possibility and it is a relatively rare occurrence. In the case of Hodgkins the stats enumerated in the story are laughable 95% survival (that means cure folks} with treatment vs a possible 5-25% without proper treatment gee which would a sane person choose for their kid? The claim of "survivor" vs cured is also purposely misleading the author insinuates it is so the MD can not be sued that is most certainly not the case it has been the standard practice for many years that a patient is not considered cured until they have been free of the disease {in remission} for 5 years

I sincerely hope that this kid is found and that it is not too late
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC