You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: The judge made his ruling base partially on the fact the Daniel could not [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. The judge made his ruling base partially on the fact the Daniel could not
Edited on Mon May-25-09 12:40 AM by dflprincess
explain his beliefs to the judge and did not understand what he (Daniel) meant when he said he was an elder and medicine man in the religion he belongs to. Also, the religion appartently doesn't forbid conventional medical treatments. He did go through one round of chemo and it was after that his parents decided that he would not have any more sessions despite his odds of it being successful are (or were) about 90%.

The examine he had last week indicated that the tumor had begun to grow again and one of the concerns is that it will grow enough to cut off his airway. According to a doctor quoted in yesterday's Star Tribune, Daniel has just a few weeks, possibly less than a month before this happens, the original chemo treatment had shrunk the tumor and eased his breathing. I wonder if his parents couldn't stand how sick the treatments made him, how they will cope when they have to watch him literally gasping for air.

Another factor in the judge's ruling was the fact Daniel is only 13 even the judge said that if he was 16 or 17 and seemed to have a better grasp of the risk he was taking the ruling may have been different.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC