Reply #85: I cited peer-reviewed studies that clearly indicate this study is poorly done/bogus

[philb]

And the evidence is clear, and you or anyone else can't demonstrate otherwise

The huge amount of clear clinical experience and thousands of medical tests that confirm what I say here is just additional very strong evidence supporting my case. A much bigger sample size than this study, and done in a credible manner-
contrary to this obviously poorly structured study that does not, could not demonstrate what is claimed.

This is an example of a straw dog study. Demonstate one thing (short time in blood of ethyl compared to methyl) and claim something else that has nothing to do with this- body burden or toxic effects;

As has been demonstrated by 2 of the most experienced mercury researchers in the U.S. (Clarkson and Magos), its not how long mercury remains in the blood that is important, its the levels in the brain and other organs and the neurotoxic, hormonal, and metabolic effects. The major neurotoxic, hormonal, and metabolic effects of thimerosal/ethyl mercury have been documented in the medical literature www.flcv.com/kidshg.html and by clinical experience of the hundreds of doctors treating thousands of autistic children, and as confirmed by the large ARI parent survey.